Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law Missouri

Missouri Introduces Recreational Cannabis Legalization Measure

Missouri is trying to introduce legal cannabis. It remains to be seen if it will pass or remain unattainable for the state.

A Missouri lawmaker introduced a comprehensive bill to legalize recreational cannabis on Tuesday. The measure, titled the Cannabis Freedom Act (HB 2704), was introduced in the Missouri House of Representatives by Representative Ron Hicks, a Republican from St. Charles.

If passed, the bill would legalize cannabis for adult-use, regulate recreational cannabis commerce and expunge convictions for past cannabis-related offenses. In a statement, Hicks acknowledged the assistance from interested parties and an Oklahoma colleague in drafting the legislation.

“The Cannabis Freedom Act is the product of input from many different stakeholders including members of law enforcement and those who have endured incarceration for conduct that society now deems acceptable,” Hicks said. “I am particularly grateful for input from Oklahoma State Representative Scott Fetgatter for his assistance in creating a free market program that is also strictly regulated.”

Bill Legalizes Recreational Cannabis Possession and Sales​

Under the bill, adults 21 and older would be permitted to purchase and use recreational cannabis. Adults would be also be allowed to grow up to 12 cannabis plants at home for personal use.

The bill tasks the Missouri Department of Agriculture with regulating the recreational cannabis program. The department would draft the rules for the program and issue licenses for cannabis producers, manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, without caps on the number of licenses that could be issued to qualified cannabis businesses.

The Cannabis Freedom Act directs the state Department of Revenue to set a tax of up to 12 percent on recreational cannabis products. Medical cannabis purchases by registered patients would not be subject to the retail tax. Revenue raised by marijuana taxes would be used to administer the recreational cannabis program, with the remainder divided equally among the Missouri Veterans Commission and funding for teachers’ salaries and pensions for first responders.

The legislation prohibits state financial regulators from denying or impeding access to banking services by legal cannabis businesses. Licensed cannabis businesses would be permitted to take state deductions for business expenses not allowed under federal law, and companies denied licenses would be allowed to deduct fees paid to apply.

Christina Thompson of Show-Me Cannabis, a group advocating for marijuana policy reform in Missouri, said that Hicks’ bill would create a cannabis industry for businesses of all sizes.

“The Cannabis Freedom Act provides a fair, open market that every Missourian can participate in,” Thompson told local media. “The cannabis community desperately needs this piece of legislation, and I’m hopeful that our lawmakers will understand just how vital it is that this passes.”

Measure Expunges Cannabis Convictions​

The legislation also includes provisions for the expungement of convictions for nonviolent marijuana-related activities legalized by the bill. Those currently incarcerated would be eligible for resentencing, and those with past convictions would be permitted to petition the court to have their records expunged. The bill also permits those on probation or parole to use cannabis. Additionally, the odor of cannabis would no longer be considered probable cause for a law enforcement officer to conduct a search without a warrant.

Daniel Jones, a former Rolla City councilman and U.S. Navy veteran, praised the reformative justice provisions of the legislation.

“I am heartened to see that the Cannabis Freedom Act contains full release and expungement protocols for marijuana-only offenders,” said Jones. “The passage of this proposal will represent a historic victory for civil rights and individual liberty in America.”

New Haven Police Chief Chris Hammann and former Carter County prosecutor Rocky Kingree also expressed support for cannabis legalization in Missouri.

“Law enforcement does not need to be tasked with the thankless job of marijuana prohibition anymore and the Cannabis Freedom Act allows for the reparative justice actions that will continue the work of repairing the relationship and trust between the government and its citizens,” the law enforcement officials said in a joint statement.

Ballot Initiative Efforts Also Underway​

The Cannabis Freedom Act gives Missouri another potential avenue for marijuana policy reform. Last year, the group Fair Access Missouri launched an initiative campaign to amend the state constitution to legalize recreational cannabis possession, production, and sales. Additionally, a separate initiative effort by the group Legal Missouri 2022 that is endorsed by the Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (MACDL) would also legalize recreational cannabis in the state.

“The automatic expungement of non-violent marijuana offenses would be among the most significant—and overdue—criminal justice reforms in our state’s history,” said Fawzy Simon, MACDL president. “It’s a matter of basic fairness. Simply put, the legalization of marijuana for adult use must relieve otherwise law-abiding Missourians of the consequences of activity that is no longer considered criminal. In practical terms, this will provide a fresh start to tens of thousands of state residents.”
 

Time running short for dueling Missouri marijuana legalization efforts


A legislative push and initiative petition face looming deadlines in the coming weeks​

With the end of the legislative session only weeks away, and organizers of an initiative petition campaign sounding the alarm about an even more pressing deadline, dueling efforts to legalize marijuana in Missouri face uncertain fates.
In the legislature, GOP state Rep. Ron Hicks is sponsoring a bill to legalize possession and use of marijuana for individuals 21 and older.
But while it received a committee hearing in early March, it took nearly a month to get a vote — and when it did, a pair of amendments were added that the bill’s supporters labeled poison pills.
“Do we still have time? Yes,” said Hicks, noting the legislature will adjourn at 6 p.m. on May 13.
“I’ve seen bills sail through the process in a week. It really comes down to whether we have the will to tackle it.”
Meanwhile, backers of a proposal to place the marijuana legalization issue on the statewide ballot this year are begging for help to gather enough signatures before a May 8 deadline.
In an industry newsletter, first reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the call went out for medical marijuana businesses to donate money and staff to the effort — with a reminder that the proposal would give them first dibs on the lucrative new recreational marijuana licenses.
“We have already collected and processed over 170,000 signatures but still need to collect at least that many more in the remaining weeks to ensure we have cushion and certainty we’re on the ballot,” the newsletter said.

Push for signatures​

Missouri voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2018 creating the medical marijuana program.
State regulators began setting up the new industry soon after, initially issuing 338 licenses to sell, grow and process marijuana — the minimum required in the constitutional amendment.
They argued the caps would help ensure oversupply didn’t fuel a black market. And last week the Missouri Medical Cannabis Trade Association noted Missouri has more than three times the number of dispensaries as Illinois, which has twice Missouri’s population and both medical and recreational programs.
But critics of the program say the caps have created a monopoly in the state and have created the appearance of corruption. Those concerns were further stoked by rumblings of an FBI public corruption investigation and revelations of problems with the scoring process set up to decide who received a license.
Last year, the medical marijuana industry began the process of putting another constitutional amendment on the 2022 ballot to legalize recreational marijuana.
Like the 2018 measure, Legal Missouri 2022 would allow the state to continue capping licenses while ensuring current medical marijuana license holders get the initial batch of recreational licenses.



To make the ballot, the campaign must collect signatures from at least 8% of voters in six of the state’s eight congressional districts. This year, that would mean 170,000 signatures, though successful campaigns historically turn in a much higher total to offset signatures being invalidated.
The industry newsletter said the campaign is aiming to turn in 300,000 signatures before the May 8 deadline.
One of the biggest hurdles the effort has faced has been a shortage of people to collect signatures around the state. In the newsletter, medical marijuana businesses were urged to devote full-time employees to signature gathering duties to ensure the measure makes the ballot.
Asked last week about the lack of signature gatherers, the campaign’s spokesman declined to delve into specifics, saying only that “our singular focus remains making sure that Missourians have the opportunity to make our state the 20th to authorize the use, taxation and regulation of marijuana for adult use.”
Meanwhile, Missouri’s medical marijuana industry is pouring money into the campaign.
Since the beginning of April, Legal Missouri 2022 has received more than $1.4 million from industry sources.
The Missouri Medical Cannabis Trade Association says medical marijuana sales topped $30 million in March, for the first time approaching $1 million a day.

‘Free-market system’​

Hicks has framed his proposal as a free-market alternative to the Legal Missouri 2022 effort.
Among a litany provisions in the legislation, Hicks’ proposal initially didn’t limit the number of licenses the state would issue to grow and sell marijuana.
“Why would we cap business licenses on this industry when you have no other industry?” Hicks said.
“We don’t do it for alcohol. You can open a liquor store and I can open the store, and if your business plan is better and your prices are better and your customer service is better, you’re gonna outdo me and my doors will eventually close. That’s how it’s supposed to work in America. That’s the free-market system.”
But Hicks’ bill was adamantly opposed by Missouri’s medical marijuana industry, and the chairman of the House committee the bill was assigned to added an amendment to limit the number of licenses to the number of current medical marijuana permits.
Through negotiation, the amendment was altered to allow twice as many business licenses as are currently issued, but Hicks still doesn’t like it.
“I want that amendment off the bill,” Hicks said.
Another amendment also was added in committee that would exclude transgender women from access to no-interest loans for women- and minority-owned cannabis businesses, though the amendment’s sponsor has said he’d remove it if it could impact the bill’s chances of success.
But even if the transgender amendment is removed, backers of Hicks’ bill argue it has already slowed down the legislation’s progress.
“We do not take a position on transgender issues and see this scheme as designed to eat up valuable time on the legislative calendar as the session moves to its close in mid-May,” said Tim Gilio, founder of the Missouri Marijuana Legalization Movement.
Some of his colleagues may have heartburn about the idea of legalizing marijuana use, Hicks said, but it is going to happen eventually — with or without lawmakers.
“We need to act first,” he said.
“It’s time that we started listening to the people. We’ve ignored them long enough, and they just turn to the initiative petition process. We don’t like that, but all they are doing is pointing out that they can go around us when we don’t listen. So it’s time we listen.”
 
"Because the proposed amendment would go into effect through the Missouri Constitution, lawmakers would be unable to make any changes through law"

Good...I've had it with venal politicians overriding the will of voters and we have indeed seen that time after time.

“If we're going to legalize this, let's legalize it through the legislature"

Alright...time to be careful because if I typed what I actually think of this Hick's thing then Mom will be spanking my pee-pee for name calling (usually, I have to pay her for the spankings! haha).

Yeah, right Hicks....that really carries heavy weight with voters who have seen the garbage filled crap legislation that comes out of politicians with titles so misleading that they should be prosecuted for false advertising and so full of buried unrelated shit that some politician just needs to drive down the throat of voters.

The reason we have Constitutions at the Federal AND state levels is precisely to restrict politicians from undermining the freedoms of citizens.


Legalization of recreational marijuana will be on the Missouri ballot in November

Missouri voters will have the ability to legalize recreational marijuana use through a constitutional amendment, now that the petition has gained enough signatures to go on the ballot​



Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft ruled on two petitions Tuesday. One, dealing with ranked choice voting, did not gain enough signatures, but the petition on recreational marijuana did.


The marijuana petition received the number of needed signatures in six of Missouri’s eight congressional districts, according to the Secretary of State’s Office.


The petition will appear as Amendment 3 on the ballot, and if a majority of Missouri voters approve it, recreational marijuana will be legal in the state.


John Payne, campaign manager for Legal Missouri 2022, said the support the petition received to get it on the ballot is good news for its chances in November.


“We think that indicates that there's a strong support among Missouri voters for this. And that's also consistent with the public polling that's out there and our internal polling as well,” Payne said.


Under the petition, marijuana use would be legal for those 21 and older, although there could be limits on how much someone could possess.


Payne said the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services would set that possession limit, though it could not be less than 3 ounces.


It also allows people with “certain marijuana-related non-violent offenses to petition for release from incarceration or parole, and probation.”

The upcoming vote comes as the Missouri legislature failed to advance a sweeping marijuana bill that would have legalized recreational use as well as other provisions related to cannabis.


Rep. Ron Hicks, R-Defiance, sponsored that legislation and is against the initiative petition for multiple reasons.


“All we're doing is creating new criminal penalties for marijuana. We are monopolizing the industry to keep others out, like minorities, for example. There's a small group of people already in the industry, and they're the only ones that are going to be allowed,” Hicks said.


Hicks said a possession limit could pose a problem if the federal government decides to legalize marijuana on a national basis.


“We in the constitution here in Missouri still have penalties for possession of marijuana. We criminalize it still. We’re not helping this state any,” Hicks said.


The representative also has an issue with the limited number of licenses issued to sell marijuana, saying it boxes out people who want to further work within the marijuana industry.


“We have 16,000 alcohol licenses in this state, that's fair. You want to open up a liquor store, you get approval by your city council or whoever and you open up a liquor store. I think it should be the same in this industry,” Hicks said.


Payne said that the upcoming amendment would add 144 licenses and that the department could release more.


Because the proposed amendment would go into effect through the Missouri Constitution, lawmakers would be unable to make any changes through law if issues arise. Instead, those fixes would have to be through another constitutional amendment.


“As it sits right now the [initiative petition] passes, you get what you get, you cannot change it unless you go through an initiative petition process again,” Hicks said.


Since lawmakers have the ability to put issues on the ballot themselves, Payne said that’s an avenue for lawmakers to fix any problems.


“If they want to change something in it, they can refer that to voters, and voters get to decide whether that amendment will be changed or not,” Payne said.


Missourians in 2018 voted to legalize medical marijuana through a different constitutional amendment with almost 66% of the vote. Illinois has medical and recreational marijuana.


Hicks hopes enough voters will read the petition and decide it isn’t what the state needs.


“If we're going to legalize this, let's legalize it through the legislature where there's framework and everybody's involved in it, not large corporations from out of state and not the largest lobbyists in our state,” Hicks said.


Election Day is Nov. 8.
 
Going to be interesting seeing how this plays out in my home state of Maryland, also. Referendum for rec legal passed in Nov and is to take effect in July, 2023.

Now here, there is zero tax on medical cannabis the same as any other prescription drug.

To some degree, that will offset the cost of our still annual requirement to renew our certification with a Dr. So, costs me $150 to annually certify against savings of our 6% sales tax.

Not sure how this will work, but I do remember in CO some years ago the dispensaries had different menus for rec vs med. I think the med was a bigger menu but I've never understood the difference (testing result requirment differences, maybe??) and don't know if that will be the same here or whether all grows/dispensaries will just start selling rec across the board.

Interesting times.


With Recreational Weed legal, officials expect Medical Marijuana licenses to dwindle


Recreational marijuana is legal in the state of Missouri, as of Thursday, Dec. 8. And while the implementation of the voter-approved change is ongoing, state officials say it's likely to lead to a noticeable decline in medical marijuana licensing.

As it charts next steps, the Missouri Division of Cannabis Regulation is looking at the experiences of other states that legalized both medical and recreational marijuana. Division Director of Public Outreach Lyndall Fraker said the main anticipation is fewer medical marijuana patients.

As of mid-December, about 207,000 medical marijuana patients are registered in Missouri, but Fraker said the division is "pretty confident" that this number will go down in the coming years.

"Even though (customers) still may be purchasing (marijuana) for an actual medical situation, they still may purchase it under the adult-use, just so they don't have to be in the registry or so they don't have to get a certification or go to the doctor every three years," Fraker said.

Despite this, Fraker said he expects the medical marijuana industry to remain "viable" and expects the sales of marijuana, both medical and recreational, to triple.

One reason Fraker believes the medical marijuana industry will remain productive in generating venue is because of the sales tax difference. Under Amendment 3, a 4% sales tax is imposed on medical marijuana and a 6% sales tax is imposed on recreational marijuana. In addition, local entities may add up to an additional 3% sales tax on recreational marijuana products, while the medical marijuana sales tax is fixed. This means there is potential for a 5 percentage point difference in the tax rate.

Amendment 3 makes other changes to medical marijuana — almost the entire first half of the amendment replaces the medical marijuana legislation voters approved passed four years ago.

Under the new rules, medical marijuana patients need only renew their medical marijuana cards every three years, rather than annually, Fraker said. Physicians will only have to renew their certifications every three years, too.

Recreational, medical marijuana will be available at the same dispensaries​

Although the regulations for medical and recreational marijuana have important differences, the products themselves are the same and will be available at the same dispensaries. The only difference, Fraker said, is that a medicinal user must show a medical marijuana card while a recreational user must show a valid photo ID.

Dispensaries may host separate registers for the two products or package them differently, but this is up to each individual dispensary.

Some of the other changes Amendment 3 made include:

  • Removes state prohibitions on purchasing, possessing, consuming, using, delivering, manufacturing and selling marijuana for personal use for adults over 21;
  • Requires a registration card for personal cultivation with prescribed limits;
  • Allows persons with certain non-violent, marijuana-related offenses to petition for release from incarceration or parole and probation and have records cleared;
  • Establishes a lottery selection process to award licenses and certificates;
  • Issues equally distributed licenses to each congressional district;
  • Imposes a 6% tax on the retail price of marijuana to benefit various programs.
 

Anticipation for the change was high. Marwa Babiker, operations manager at ViolaSTL in Downtown West, said an older man — she estimated he was about 90 — stopped in earlier in the week to ask if they were selling recreational-use pot.
Told it was not yet available, he returned at 11:30 a.m. Friday to ask again. The store had been issued a license by then, but it was not open for business. He returned again at noon, when they opened, to make his purchase.
The Health Department had given every indication that the licenses would not be issued until Monday. Most customers were confused to learn that recreational-use cannabis would actually be available beginning Friday, although many dispensaries had an inkling something might be up.
“We kind of figured,” said Chad Huelsman, manager of an N’Bliss dispensary near Manchester in unincorporated St. Louis County. “They had pushed it to the last minute, not telling anyone.
 

Robust Cannabis has a 75,000-square-foot greenhouse in Cuba, Mo. with about 70 employees who come from the surrounding areas (Rebecca Rivas/The Missouri Independent).


With the high demand, Rinella said the industry has seen some price increases. But he said it’s important to remember that two years ago, an eighth of flower – the most common product sold – was at $60 dispensaries.

And at one point, the price dipped as low as $25.

“Right now it’s just really starting to stabilize,” he said. “It looks like things are sitting around the $40 to $45 mark,” which are the average prices at Hippos’ menu.

About 25 years ago on the illicit market, he said an eighth was about $50.



I remember paying $60 for an 1/8 from my black market friend. Way back in the day when they came out with the medical in the beginning. Folks were growing for medical and selling illegal. I often didn’t know the name of the weed.
CK
 
Last edited:
"addressing a key criticism of the medical marijuana program that the Black community was left out of the burgeoning billion-dollar industry."​

And by "left out" they mean that they didn't get the carve outs....the set asides....that they wanted. As far as I know, nobody was denied the opportunity to apply for a license.

If they did as it was done in Maryland, there was zero race or sex information contained in the application and proposals for licenses. Now, this didn't stop the complaining and in fact the Maryland Black Legislative Caucus purposefully delayed allowing the program to open until they got their race based set asides.

“And the microbusinesses are aimed at creating some more equity for people that are underrepresented.”​

And I'll translate this into plain English for you.....the micro-business license are aimed at providing licenses to black Americans...only. Full stop.

As for "communities disproportionately impacted" by the "war on drugs"...I got news for you....broke ass Joe Smith who was busted in East St. Louis for cannabis on the street corner is not going to come up with the scratch to open and operate a dispensary much less a grow or processor operation. That's big money and yes, these licenses will indeed go to black people....black people with lots of money. Sort of like the white people with lots of money who own cannabis businesses. In Maryland it was a cool $100K just to convert a dispensary med license to full rec. And a lot more for growers.

And.....the "micro-business licenses" that are set aside for these communities are going to be issued via lottery. Blind fucking lottery. Oh yeah, that's sure to result in people with business acumen, who will successfully open and run a cannabis business, winning licenses. I'd be interested to see the survey on how many of these micro-businesses are still open.....and NOT sold to the highest bidder.....a few years down the road.


Missouri official vows to conduct survey on Cannabis business demographics

A key criticism of the medical marijuana program was the Black community was left out of the cannabis industry.


But the state has yet to conduct a survey to find out.

For the first time, a state official has publicly vowed to push for a demographics survey of cannabis business owners — addressing a key criticism of the medical marijuana program that the Black community was left out of the burgeoning billion-dollar industry.

At a June 22 outreach event in St. Louis, Abigail Vivas, chief equity officer with the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, said she would advocate for a survey where license holders could volunteer their demographic information.

“Considering the spirit of the constitution…I think that data is important,” said Vivas, who was hired in the newly created chief equity officer position in February.

Vivas led four events throughout the state last month to educate people about the microbusiness cannabis program, which proponents of Missouri’s marijuana legalization amendment said during last year’s campaign was aimed at giving access to communities who have been most impacted by marijuana criminalization.

This fall, Missouri will award 48 microbusiness licenses, and the window to file applications is July 27 to Aug. 10. The application is now available on DHSS’ website.

The program was created as part of a policy response to what industry leaders know the survey will show — that there are very few Black-owned cannabis businesses in Missouri, and potentially few women-owned businesses as well.

“There is some under representation, no doubt,” said John Payne, a cannabis consultant who helped write the constitutional amendment voters passed in November to legalize recreational marijuana. “And the microbusinesses are aimed at creating some more equity for people that are underrepresented.”

In order for these businesses to be able to compete and succeed, the number of new regular licenses in Missouri by law will stay frozen until June 8, 2024.

The only new licenses DHSS can issue until then are microbusiness licenses.

Both state and industry leaders need to spend the next year supporting these new businesses, Payne said.

St. Louis-based BeLeaf Medical is among several companies sponsoring accelerator programs for microbusiness applicants.

“What do they get out of it?” said Todd Scattini, founder of Harvest 360, a consulting group brought in by BeLeaf to lead their education initiative. “People understand like, ‘Okay, they get it.’ They’re trying to help this community that has been destroyed by the War on Drugs by giving them information and access to networks and technology.”

Payne’s consulting firm, Amendment 2 Consultants, has also partnered with the Kansas-City-based cannabis company Show-Me Organics to provide assistance to microbusiness applicants.

Larger businesses could benefit from certain branding opportunities, Payne said, and collaborations that are allowed under the law. But like Scattini, he said it’s also about recognizing Black Missourians are 2.6 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than White Missourians.

“So that should carry over into a disproportionate good impact of the microbusiness licenses,” Payne said. “But what we don’t know and don’t control is who ends up actually applying. And we won’t know that until they’re awarded.”

Vivas said she will write an annual report that will include how many people applied and won microbusiness licenses in each of the seven eligibility criteria. By law, the report must be completed by Jan. 1. People can qualify for a microbusiness license, ranging from a lower income level or living in an area considered impoverished to having past arrests or incarcerations related to marijuana offenses.

Her report will hopefully show who the microbusiness program is opening access for, she said, and ways the department can partner with the business community.

However, DHSS is also mandated by the constitution to prepare a publicly available report for the entire cannabis industry that provides “aggregate data for each type of license.”

Payne said this is where the voluntary survey would come in.

DHSS has sent out surveys within the cannabis industry in the past for other topics, including on banking status. And that has informed policies and partnerships, including legislation on banking that the governor signed last week.

“If people are willing to put that information out in an anonymized way…,” Payne said, “being able to say, ‘Hey, the industry is this percentage male, this percentage of different racial and ethnic backgrounds,’ I think that is useful information from a policy standpoint.”
 

Missouri Regulators Recall Thousands of Cannabis Products

Regulators in Missouri on Monday issued a notice to recall more than 60,000 cannabis products in the state that were insufficiently processed before hitting the market.

The Missouri Division of Cannabis Regulation said that it is “issuing a patient and consumer communication to alert patients and consumers about a mandatory product recall” affecting “manufactured products sold to dispensaries and manufacturers by infused product manufacturer, Delta Extraction, LLC, MAN000022.”

According to the agency, the “recalled products were not compliantly tracked in the statewide track and trace system (METRC) in order for [Division of Cannabis Regulation] to verify the products came from marijuana grown in Missouri or that the product passed required testing prior to being sold at dispensaries.”

Monday’s notice said that no “adverse reactions for this product have been reported to the [Division of Cannabis Regulation] at this time,” but the agency says that all patients and consumers “who have purchased the recalled product should discontinue use.”

“All unused product(s) should be discarded or returned to the dispensary where purchased. Returned products will not count toward a patient’s purchase limit. For more information on returns, please contact the dispensary where the product was purchased,” the notice said.

A complete list of the recalled cannabis products, totaling 62,800, can be found on the Missouri Department of Health and Human Services’ website.

Medical cannabis sales began in Missouri in October of 2020, while adult-use weed sales launched in February.

In May, the state reported that cumulative cannabis sales for both medical and adult-use eclipsed $1 billion.

“Missouri’s newest billion-dollar industry is experiencing significant job growth, providing great products and services to Missourians, and becoming an integral part to the local economy throughout the state,” Andrew Mullins, the executive director of the Missouri Cannabis Trade Association, said after the figures were reported. “Missouri has avoided so many of the early hiccups that other states have experienced transitioning from a medical cannabis program focusing on quality, affordability, access and selection. Missouri’s cannabis program could not have gotten off to a better start. A sincere thank you to all the patients, customers, and small business owners that helped Missouri reach this impressive milestone.”

In the first month of Missouri’s recreational adult-use cannabis market, sales topped $100 million.

Mullins noted at the time that the figure was “more than double what Illinois did in a state with twice the population.”

“So it really shows the interest and excitement for the new adult-use industry in Missouri,” Mullins said earlier this year.

“Canna-tourism folks that may decide to come to Missouri to access and utilize cannabis,” he added. “That seems to also be having an impact on the amount of sales that Missouri’s experiencing.”

Still, product recalls are a fact of any legal cannabis market –– and a reminder of the importance of sound and thorough regulation.

Regulators in Colorado issued a recall last year after detecting “potentially unsafe levels of total yeast and mold and aspergillus on Medical Marijuana flower (bud/shake/trim).”

The Colorado Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment issued an advisory in the fall saying they “deem it a threat to public health and safety when marijuana is found to have levels of total yeast and mold and aspergillus above the acceptable limits established.”

“[The Department of Revenue] has identified Harvest Batches of Medical Marijuana produced by [The Living Rose] that were not submitted for testing…Harvest Batches of Medical Marijuana produced by [The Living Rose] were required to be tested by the [Department of Revenue] and were found to contain total yeast and mold and aspergillus above the acceptable amounts,” the advisory said.
 

Missouri Lawmaker Urges Investigation Into ‘Egregious Exploitation’ In Marijuana Social Equity Licensing Process


“It is disheartening to see bad actors attempt to exploit the system for personal gain, undermining the very opportunities we sought to create.”

By Rebecca Rivas, Missouri Independent

A St. Louis lawmaker is demanding that Missouri regulators investigate what she called an “egregious exploitation” of social cannabis equity licenses, following a report by The Independent last week about a company that recruited out-of-state license applicants on Craigslist.

State Sen. Karla May, a St. Louis Democrat, sent a letter on Thursday to the state’s Division of Cannabis Regulation and Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey demanding action.

Voters approved the microbusiness program last November, as a provision in the constitutional amendment that legalized recreational marijuana. May wrote that the program was intended to “rectify past injustices” of marijuana criminalization.

“I condemn these actions as an affront to the principles that guided the citizens’ initiative,” May stated. “The people of Missouri spoke loud and clear in their support for a fair, inclusive cannabis industry that addresses historical disparities. It is disheartening to see bad actors attempt to exploit the system for personal gain, undermining the very opportunities we sought to create.”

May’s letter was sent hours after The Independent published a story revealing that a Michigan real estate group, Canna Zoned MLS, offered to pay eligible people to enter lotteries awarding social equity licenses in Illinois and Missouri.

But two applicants told The Independent that they didn’t realize the company’s contracts forced them to relinquish all control and profits of the business, according to an agreement they said they signed.

On October 2, the state issued 48 licenses to the winners of a lottery that determined who gets to participate in Missouri’s microbusiness program. Of the 16 dispensary licenses awarded, the Michigan group obtained two of them—one in Columbia and the other in Arnold.

“The schemes orchestrated by these applicants potentially involve fraudulent activities,” May said, “gaming the system to secure licenses through the exploitation of legacy advantages that the ballot language aimed to mitigate.”

Jeffrey Yatooma, the designated contact on licenses associated with the Michigan group, told The Independent last week that the group rejects “any allegations that we have defrauded the state.” Any final agreements with partners in Missouri, he said, “will absolutely comply with all state laws and regulations.”

In response to May’s letter, Yatooma told The Independent he stands by his previous statements.

Division of Cannabis Regulation Director Amy Moore responded to May in a letter Friday morning.

Moore said the division shares the senator’s desire that the program be “implemented exactly as designed and that no unscrupulous actors be allowed to subvert the law.”

“In fact, the law itself anticipated the need to investigate whether microbusiness licenses were awarded to eligible applicants post licensure,” she said, “and we are currently conducting that mandated verification process.”

Moore said the division’s “post-licensure verification” for the 48 license winners will be completed in early December, followed by a public report of the results.

“If we determine that an application was false or misleading in any way, the license issued based on that application may be revoked,” Moore said.

The division has broad authority to conduct investigations.

Under a new rule that went into effect on July 30, the department now has the power to issue subpoenas directly to licensed marijuana businesses and third parties during an investigation to obtain records and information.

“Applicants and licensees must cooperate in any investigation conducted by the department,” the rules state.

In her letter, Moore said that if the division uncovers activity “that is of concern but outside our jurisdiction, we will refer that information to the appropriate authority.”

The attorney general’s office, which also received the letter, did not respond to a request for comment.

After reading The Independent’s article, state Rep. Ashley Bland-Manlove, a Kansas City Democrat, called the actions “predatory and criminal.”

“I encourage all states involved to revoke any licenses issued and reissue them to actual residents who qualify,” she said. “I’d like to see criminal charges for the lawyers who created the contacts and whomever created the Craigslist posts for fraud.”

Jack Cardetti, spokesman for the Missouri Cannabis Trade Association, said it’s up to the division’s verification process to make sure the laws and rules were followed.

“Article 14 of the Missouri Constitution entrusts the agency to run this voter-approved program effectively,” he said, “and we hope they live up to that.”
 
“The people of Missouri spoke loud and clear in their support for a fair, inclusive cannabis industry that addresses historical disparities.
Ah...."historical disparities"....translation, race based set carve outs. And I'll bet "the people of Missouri" is mostly St Louis and Kansas City.
 
"These newly instated regulations limit cannabis facilitators to brand and market their products with one color, as well as shifting from glass jars to mylar material, ultimately tarnishing any brand recognition that manufacturers and cultivators once had."

This ^^ is idiotic (particularly the mylar) and its my opinion that people wrap themselves up in the flag of "oh, but the children" to justify doing what they want to do in any case.


Missouri Cannabis industry grapples with drastic changes in regulations


Not only are these regulations going to put a damper on what Missouri cannabis consumers know and love about the industry, but other recent adjustments have already started burning holes in customers’ pockets.​


Cannabis consumers around the state already have or will soon start to see shifts when purchasing marijuana from licensed retailers.


Regulations from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services that have recently gone into effect restrict certain branding, marketing, labeling, and product production.


Not only are these regulations going to put a damper on what Missouri cannabis consumers know and love about the industry, but other recent adjustments have already started burning holes in customers’ pockets.


“They Killed the Creativity”​


Last November, voters around the state heavily pushed for the legalization of recreational cannabis use, which was passed with ease, and led to a very smooth transition from strictly medical use to complete legality.


This is largely due to the medical marijuana infrastructure that was already set in stone, prior to the first recreational cannabis sale, with over 220 licensed dispensaries already established throughout Missouri.


“That was one of the reasons that we were able to make a fairly smooth transition from medical to adult use,” MoCannTrade spokesperson Jack Cardetti says. “A lot of that has worked really really well.”


MoCannTrade consists of various cannabis professionals around the state, serving as the lead voices behind successful, safe, and compliant cannabis use in the Missouri cannabis industry.


Following the passing of the alteration from medical to recreational use, the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services proposed new rules regarding the way manufacturers and cultivators go about their packaging, labeling, branding, and production.


These newly instated regulations limit cannabis facilitators to brand and market their products with one color, as well as shifting from glass jars to mylar material, ultimately tarnishing any brand recognition that manufacturers and cultivators once had.


“It’s all in place as of today. That makes us, as a recreational market in the United States, the most restrictive for regulation, for licensing, for rules, for everything. It is the most restrictive state,” Franklin’s Stash House co-owner Michael Wilson says.


The reason why the DHSS put these regulations in place is to protect children from consuming any products that could potentially harm them. Yet, the department has not provided any statistics regarding the information, according to professionals around the line of business.


“They base all this on the idea of protecting children. I have children and I completely agree, but there’s been no transparency about how many children have actually gone and been admitted to the ER from a product that has been consumed from our industry,” Wilson.


“From a public health standpoint, from a public safety standpoint, I totally understand, but at the same time, it’s like, do you have to go so crazy on us,” Josh Ordo, head of procurement at ReLeaf Resources Dispensary says.


When rules and regulations were first introduced, the cannabis industry was to be held to the same standards as alcohol and tobacco products sold throughout the state. But with the recent changes, it is clear to see that it is a double standard.


“We’re supposed to be held to the same standard as alcohol and tobacco, and it seems like we’re kind of getting away from that now in a sense,” Ordo says.


“We were not to be held to a different standard than alcohol and their advertising guidelines. Especially when companies have developed their branding around specific artwork, colors, and so forth, then that restricts a lot of that,” Kansas City Cannabis CEO Dan Nelson says. “Those companies lose their branding and their ability to create that self-image that a lot of people look far.”


The lack of creativity and a personal feel will put an extremely large damper on how manufacturers and cultivators, specifically smaller, local businesses, go about creating a brand that has a genuine and personal replication of the business themselves.


“I have no means to express to you who we are, why my product is better, it’s just got better drip than everybody else,” Wilson says. “I can’t do that anymore, there’s no such thing as drip anymore, there’s no such thing as creativity. They killed the creativity.”


“It’s creating more of a sterile environment. When you come in, you’re gonna look at black-and-white options where companies before relied upon creativity to stand alone and also to be recognized in the public… It definitely handcuffs any opportunities for those companies to succeed,” Nelson says.


Now, different cultivators and manufacturers are having to take unconventional measures and make drastic changes to how they operate their businesses.


“For the first time, licensees have to go to the department and essentially ask permission ahead of time, to get pre-approval for any new packaging,” Cardetti says.


While there is a large concern that creativity behind the brands that fuel the market is dying due to the regulations and guidelines, there are also worries that the process of gaining permission from the DHSS will halt the immense growth that the industry has seen over the last year.


“Any new product that a Missouri manufacturer or cultivator comes up with today, it’s gonna be months before customers ever see those at the market now, because of this sort-of forced delay that the department has put in place,” Cardetti says.


The DHSS is also issuing guidance letters in an attempt to enforce rules that are not set in place, a conniving attempt to impose even more restraint on those in the industry.


“When you do rule by guidance letters, there’s fewer accountability there for the department and they think that’s something that lawmakers are concerned about, and it’s something, quite frankly, the industry is concerned about as well,” Cardetti says.


“We expected those rules to look a lot like the medical marijuana rules, and in fact, they were a large departure,” he says.


Saying Goodbye to Prized Products​


Along with the branding and labeling changes, certain products from those who provide the state with copious amounts of cannabis consumables are being thrown out the window: Including the fan-favorite cannabis-infused James’ Lemonade.


Moving forward, no currently existing products, such as James’ Lemonade, can be infused with THC for medical or recreational sale. For example, attempting to infuse a bottle of Gates Barbecue Sauce with THC would be restricted since it is an already established non-cannabis product.


Similar to the regulations regarding packaging processes, the DHSS states that child safety is the sole reason for banning certain products and placing restrictions on future cannabis-infused production, according to professionals around the industry.


Cannabis-infused James’ Lemonade was previously one of Franklin’s Stash House’s largest revenue streams, making up around 40% of its total revenue. But with the recent regulations enforced, they must bring the selling of the product to a halt.


“40% of my business up until these rules came out were from James’ Lemonade. Everybody loves James’ Lemonade, we’ve been selling it like crazy. And now imagine being an independent operator with a single license, I’m not a multimillionaire, I’m not a big conglomerate, these things hurt a Missouri operator like this,” Wilson says.


“We will adapt, we’re well-known for lots of other products, but I basically had my top-selling line completely killed because of regulation and directly targeted.”


There is now a fine line between what qualifies as a currently existing product that is not permitted to be infused with THC for medical and recreational sale.


“Well, there are certain brands that are making rice krispies on the market. Is that formulation the same as the Rice Krispy Treats we get in a box,” Ordo says. “Making a rice krispie is a recipe that’s as old as time. It’s very basic, it’s butter, marshmallows, and rice krispies, so it’s like where do you draw the line then at that point?”


As one of the few local cannabis manufacturers in Kansas City, and the state as a whole, Franklin’s Stash House is put at an extreme disadvantage, in comparison to large corporate producers.


“We do have out-of-state guys that are coming in with hundreds of millions of dollars, and buying up operators, and just playing the good old games of James Rockefeller,” Wilson says. “That’s the challenge. These laws hurt a local operator like Franklin’s and like James’ Lemonade way more than they’re going to hurt some out-of-state brand.”


“There wasn’t a problem to begin with. We didn’t have complaints about those types of products. The customers knew what they were buying, there was lots of good information on the label to make an informed decision when they purchase these products,” Cardetti says.


No License, No Issue​


While regulations continue to affect the colossal amount of members in the cannabis market, those in the unregulated industry selling delta-8, delta-9, and THCA products will experience no changes.


Delta products are chemicals and substances found amongst normal THC products, simply lacking the THC compound, making the recreational sale of them completely legal, with a lack of regulation from the FDA.


“They’re not under subject of any rule or law, yet Missouri allows it. That’s the biggest frustration, I would say as a legitimate operator, is we’re feeling the effects as a legitimate industry,” Wilson says.


A major question that has been raised as a result of the regulations is if the children’s hospitalizations from consuming cannabis products come from licensed dispensaries, unlicensed smoke shops, or even home growers.


“Maybe it’s the unregulated stuff that they need to worry about. They’re trying to cite data about kids consuming products, well there’s also people who make their own gummies at home that make them look like gummy bears, and we can’t control that.”


While there is a lack of data and evidence regarding the specific products that children are getting hospitalized for, there is truly no way for the DHSS to identify where the cannabis commodities come from, creating frustration amongst licensed individuals.


Burning Holes in Pockets​


Not only are branding, packaging, labeling, and product selection going to dampen the cannabis purchasing process that Missouri residents have grown accustomed to, but manipulative tax impositions are costing customers more than they may be aware of.


While cannabis consumers may be aware of the surge in total costs as they get to the checkout line of their favorite dispensaries, many are uncertain of why this has taken place.


Earlier this year, cities and counties across the state placed a proposition for increased taxation on recreational cannabis products on ballots, many of which were approved and went into effect on Oct. 1. The approval gave municipalities and counties the authority to charge a 3% tax increase, in addition to the initial sales tax and 6% tax that goes to the state.


The format for this was for a 3% tax increase for any marijuana purchase within city limits or a 3% increase for counties to charge when customers are outside of city limits. At the end of the day, customers were always going to see a 3% tax increase, but this is not how the approval has played out.


Counties and cities have been double-stacking their taxes, creating a total of a 6% tax increase, on top of the regular sales tax and 6% state tax, ultimately resulting in at least a 12% tax on any cannabis product sold.


Despite the fact that customers are currently paying more than they should legally be required, their funds are going to a good cause: Helping expunge records of those with non-violent cannabis charges.


“We were the first state by the vote of the people, went ahead and when we legalized marijuana, instituted automatic expunges, which means it’s up to the court system to go and expunge those records.”


Since the approval of this notion on the ballot last Nov., nearly 100,000 individuals across the state have had their non-violent cannabis charges expunged.


Yet, there is a fear that the increase in taxes across the state will ultimately encourage consumers to purchase their marijuana from the black market. “If you tax the sale of legal cannabis too much, all you’re doing is fueling the illicit market,” Cardetti says.


Just a couple of weeks after this approval went into effect, MoCannTrade filed a lawsuit against St. Louis County and the state of Missouri, claiming that the manipulative actions between the counties are a money grab and overall illegal.


“We fully expect that that will be a successful lawsuit, which will save Missouri cannabis customers about $3 million every month if successful,” Cardetti says.


“Power to the People”​


While there is frustration amongst members of the cannabis market, they understand that the DHSS and the state as a whole are trying to legislate and operate a fairly new industry within our state.


“Me, as an operator providing you information here, I respect the fact that they have to make long-term policy decisions,” Wilson says. “Now I firmly disagree with a handful of them, but I mean 80 to 90 percent, I completely agree with.”


“We’ve been really impressed with how much legislators have engaged in these issues, they listen to the marijuana companies that are operating in their communities, and they are certainly talking with the department about what the rules really need to look like…,” Cardetti says.


“What we don’t want to see is half-empty shelves next Spring, what we don’t want to see is good Missouri-based companies not being able to get products to market because there’s an artificial delay at the Department of Health.”


Although cannabis professionals in the market find many of the newly imposed regulations frustrating and see them as intentional setbacks, they understand the struggles that come with regulating a freshly founded, billion-dollar business.


“At the end of the day, we gotta be fair under the fact that it’s not black or white in this industry. We all gotta have a little bit of empathy, like it’s gotta be really hard to manage a billion dollars worth of weed in your state and get it to the consumer at an affordable price,” Wilson says.


As Missouri cannabis consumers and professionals move forward, there is still much work to do in months to come. Professionals around the industry say that the cannabis consumer is the number one priority and should let their voices be heard.


“At the end of the day, when it comes to cannabis and something that may change the culture of cannabis, it’s all about power to the people,” Wilson says.


“The department doesn’t know what the consumers want unless they voice their opinions.”


“There are forms on the DHSS, there are phone numbers, there are emails that you can call and provide your opinion on, you can call and ask questions on,” he says.
 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top