Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law The Cannabis Chronicles - Misc Cannabis News

House Reintroduces SAFE Banking Act to Protect and Advance Legal Cannabis

The US House just reintroduced the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act, an act that if passed, would help the cannabis industry have access to financial services.

The act is being backed by Ed Perlmutter and Nydia Velázquez, Democrats, as well as Steve Stivers and Warren Davidson, Republicans. It also received 100 cosponsors who also support the move.
Because cannabis is still federally illegal, cannabis businesses have difficulty accessing banking, credit card processing, and business deductions for taxes. Cannabis businesses are often forced to be shady about how they do banking, or not bank at all and deal with dangerous amounts of cash. This act would be a positive first step to change all that.

Statements From The Sponsors

“The genie is out of the bottle and has been for many years. Thousands of employees and businesses across this country have been forced to deal in piles of cash for far too long, and it is the responsibility of Congress to step up and take action to align federal and state laws for the safety of our constituents and communities. The public safety need is urgent, and a public health and economic need has also emerged with the pandemic further exacerbating the cash-only problem for the industry,” said Congressman Perlmutter. “In many states, the industry was deemed essential yet forced to continue to operate in all cash, adding a significant public health risk for businesses and their workers. As we begin our economic recovery, allowing cannabis businesses to access the banking system would also mean an influx of cash into the economy and the opportunity to create good-paying jobs. Thank you to Reps. Velázquez, Stivers and Davidson for their continued support and input on the bill, and I look forward to working with Senators Merkley and Daines to get the SAFE Banking Act passed in the Senate and signed into law.”

“The cannabis industry has been operating with great success, with many of these businesses deemed essential as the coronavirus pandemic took hold,” explained Congresswoman Velázquez. “However, without the ability to safely utilize the banking system, cannabis-related businesses are left behind and stuck resorting to tactics that can threaten public safety and economic success. That’s why I am proud to join Reps. Perlmutter, Stivers, and Davidson in introducing the SAFE Banking Act, to allow these businesses in states that have legalized cannabis to access the banking system, just as any other business currently enjoys. Doing so will help create jobs in communities throughout America, while stimulating the economy as we recover from the fallout of the pandemic.”

“We have a responsibility to legislate for the reality we live in, and the reality is that legal businesses in thirty-three states, including Ohio, are being denied access to the banking system and forced to assume huge risks as a result of operating solely in cash,” added Congressman Stivers. “The SAFE Banking Act is about keeping people safe, something that 321 of my colleagues recognized last year. I look forward to seeing this bill make it all the way to the President’s desk this Congress.”
In 2019, the bill passed the House at a margin of 321 to 103. However, the Senate did not pass it. It remains to be seen if this year is different, but advocates are hopeful.
 

Legal Marijuana States See Reduced Workers’ Compensation Claims, New Study Finds


Legalizing marijuana for adult use is associated with an increase in workforce productivity and decrease in workplace injuries, according to a new study partly funded by the federal government.

In a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, researchers looked at the impact of recreational cannabis legalization on workers’ compensation claims among older adults. They found declines in such filings “both in terms of the propensity to receive benefits and benefit amount” in states that have enacted the policy change.

Further, they identified “complementary declines in non-traumatic workplace injury rates and the incidence of work-limiting disabilities” in legal states.

These findings run counter to arguments commonly made by prohibitionists, who have claimed that legalizing marijuana would lead to lower productivity and more occupational hazards and associated costs to businesses. In fact, the study indicates that regulating cannabis sales for adults is a workplace benefit by enabling older employees (40-62 years old) to access an alternative treatment option.

“We offer evidence that the primary driver of these reductions [in workers’ compensation] is an improvement in work capacity, likely due to access to an additional form of pain management therapy,” the study, which received funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, states.

The implementation of adult-use legalization seems to “improve access to an additional channel for managing pain and other health conditions, suggesting potential benefits on populations at risk of workplace injuries,” it continues.

The study is based on an analysis of data on workers’ compensation benefit receipt and workers’ compensation income from
2010 to 2018 as reported in the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey.

“Our results show a decline in workers’ compensation benefit propensity of 0.18 percentage points, which corresponds to a 20 percent reduction in any workers’ compensation income, after states legalize marijuana for recreational use. Similarly, we find that annual income received from workers’ compensation declines by $21.98 (or 20.5%) post-[recreational marijuana legalization]. These results are not driven by pre-existing trends, and falsification exercises suggest that observing estimates of this magnitude is statistically rare.”

Researchers said that they’ve found evidence that cannabis use increases post-legalization among the age cohort they studied, but no such spike in misuse. Further, they found a decline in post-legalization prescriptions for medications used to treat chronic pain, indicating that some people are using marijuana as a substitute for traditional painkillers.

“We hypothesize that access to marijuana through [recreational marijuana laws] increases its medical use and, in turn, allows better management of symptoms that impede work capacity—e.g., chronic pain, insomnia, mental health problems, nausea, and so forth,” the study says. “Chronic pain management is likely to be particularly important in our context as this is the health condition most commonly reported among medical marijuana users.”

Beyond decreasing workers’ compensation claims and costs, legalization also is a boon to the economy by adding jobs in legal states.

The cannabis industry added more than 77,000 jobs over the past year—a 32 percent increase that makes the sector the fastest in job creation compared to any other American industry, according to a report released by the cannabis company Leafly last week.
 
I saw an interesting tidbit on the local news the other night. We have a major homeless population in several cities and towns In WA state. Bellingham was trying get get their homeless to move from the park they were staying at by giving them free tents and free weed if they would move to another area. I tried looking that up and couldn’t find it. I know I heard that! They didn’t say weed the said cannabis.
 

Marijuana Legalization Bills Died In Three States This Week As Others Move Forward


Lawmakers in states across the country are taking up marijuana reform measures this year after a November election in which voters passed every state-level drug reform initiative put before them. But in three states—Maryland, Hawaii and Wyoming, bills to end cannabis prohibition this year have died in recent days as key legislative deadlines passed.

Advocates said the failure of lawmakers in Hawaii, Maryland and Wyoming to move forward on the proposals means the harms of criminalization will continue to fall disproportionately on Black and brown communities in those states for at least another year, even as a majority of voters support legalization.

“We will continue to see racially disproportionate enforcement throughout our state,” Luke Jones, director of Maryland NORML, told Marijuana Moment, “resulting in tens-of-thousands of avoidable police encounters and more arrest records we will pay to expunge next year.”

Lawmakers in other states, meanwhile, including New York, Kansas, North Dakota, Rhode Island, New Mexico, Delaware and others, are still pursuing some form of cannabis reform this year. And in Virginia, the legislature last month sent a legalization bill to the governor’s desk.

Broader drug reform efforts also got underway this year in California, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, New York, Rhode Island, Washington State and Virginia, where lawmakers have introduced a variety of bills during the 2021 session—some dealing with psychedelics but others that call for comprehensive decriminalization.

At the national level, meanwhile, lawmakers recently reintroduced a proposal to allow state-legal marijuana businesses access to banking services, with legislation to end federal cannabis prohibition expected to be introduced soon.

For now, here’s a look at the recent death of legalization bills in three states.

Maryland​

Two separate marijuana legalization bills in Maryland expired this week, one backed by top leaders in the state Senate and a competing measure introduced by Del. Jazz Lewis (D) in the House. Both failed to pass their respective chambers before a legislative deadline on Monday.

“Neither adult use legalization bill introduced in Maryland has advanced ahead of today’s crossover deadline, meaning the legislature is not ready to move forward with legalization this year,” Olivia Naugle, legislative analyst for the advocacy group Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), told Marijuana Moment. “However, bill sponsors are working on amendments that could be considered after crossover to set the stage for equitable legalization next year.”

Lewis, whose HB 32 was heard in the House Judiciary Committee last month but never voted on, told Cannabis Wire that the goal this session will now be “to move forward on the regulatory infrastructure so that there is one less barrier next year.”

Lewis proposed a number of amendments to his bill at the hearing with the aim of aligning the measure with the competing Senate bill, SB 708, which was filed with the support of the Senate president and other legislative leaders.

Meanwhile, the Senate Finance committee heard SB 708 but took no action on the measureat a meeting earlier this month. The bill’s lead sponsor, Sen. Brian Feldman (D), framed the hearing as an opportunity to discuss provisions of the legislation and gauge the likelihood of its success.

“I wanted to get a little feedback from the committee,” he told the panel. “I didn’t have a good take of where the committee is and where the committee’s concerns are.”

The latest versions of each proposal would legalize possession of up to four ounces of marijuana for adults 21 and older as well as home cultivation for personal use. Individuals with past convictions for low-level cannabis activity would see those records expunged, and people currently incarcerated for cannabis crimes would be resentenced or released.

Lewis’s proposal put a stronger focus on targeted community reinvestment than the Senate bill, for example by proposing that some tax revenue from the legal industry fund the state’s historically Black colleges and universities. HB 13 became the preferred bill among social and racial equity advocates, including the chair of Maryland’s Legislative Black Caucus, Del. Darryl Barnes (D).

Luke Jones, director of Maryland NORML, called it “a real tragedy” that legislators missed the opportunity to end marijuana prohibition this year.

“We will continue to see racially disproportionate enforcement throughout our state, resulting in tens-of-thousands of avoidable police encounters and more arrest records we will pay to expunge next year,” Jones told Marijuana Moment. “Our next steps are to invite legislators to attend training sessions on issues of persistent concern, such as non-commercial home cultivation, traffic safety, protecting children, and the role of county and local government officials under a new approach to public safety.”

A poll released earlier this month found that two-thirds (67 percent) of Marylanders support legalizing cannabis, with just 28 percent opposed. Gov. Larry Hogan (R), however, has remained lukewarm on the policy change. In mid-2018 he signed a bill to expand the state’s medical marijuana system and said full legalization was “worth taking a look at,” but last May he vetoed a bill that would’ve shielded people with low-level cannabis convictions from having their records publicized on a state database.

While the legalization bills are dead, there is still hope for some marijuana reform in Maryland this year. The House last month passed HB 324, which would expand the amount of marijuana decriminalized under state law from 10 grams to one ounce. Penalties for having less than that amount would be punishable by a fine of up to $100, with subsequent violations leading to fines of up to $500 and a referral to drug education and a substance use disorder screening. That bill is currently in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, and could potentially be a vehicle for the amendments that MPP”s Naugle said could “set the stage for equitable legalization next year.”
 
Lewis’s proposal put a stronger focus on targeted community reinvestment than the Senate bill, for example by proposing that some tax revenue from the legal industry fund the state’s historically Black colleges and universities. HB 13 became the preferred bill among social and racial equity advocates, including the chair of Maryland’s Legislative Black Caucus, Del. Darryl Barnes (D).
Of course it did....because EVERY FUCKING THING IS ABOUT RACE THESE DAYS, particularly from one side of the aisle that sees themselves as social justice warriors and never ever see even a hint of their "race, always race, race no matter the issue, race 24x7x365" racism.

This was never going to get thru in MD this year in any case given the greater issues and challenges all states are facing over the past year.
 
Of course it did....because EVERY FUCKING THING IS ABOUT RACE THESE DAYS, particularly from one side of the aisle that sees themselves as social justice warriors and never ever see even a hint of their "race, always race, race no matter the issue, race 24x7x365" racism.

This was never going to get thru in MD this year in any case given the greater issues and challenges all states are facing over the past year.
Social justice is for the mentally retarded.
 

Biden's equity pledge fall short with medical cannabis hiring​


By Debbie Churgai, opinion contributor — 03/24/21 12:31 PM EDT 221
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

When then-presidential candidate Joe Biden released his approach to federal cannabis policy in May of 2020, it was met with a feeling of excitement from medical cannabis patients, caregivers, medical professionals and researchers who have waited far too long for cannabis policy reform to change. President Biden’s proposal expressed support for states to continue organizing cannabis policy reform and pledged to forge a path forward on federally sanctioned research of medical cannabis applications to human health.

However, roughly 60 days into this administration, we have now observed Vice President Kamala Harris, who had previously authored legislation to deschedule cannabis entirely, reportedly backing away from that approach. We have also witnessed Biden administration nominees backpedal on previous support positions for reform legislation like the MORE Act and Biden opting against allowing staffers who have used cannabis in the past to serve in the White House.

If the new administration does not intend to hire qualified individuals simply based on past cannabis use, how will it organize functional policy to serve the millions of patients across this country currently relying on cannabis to treat or mitigate health symptoms and conditions ranging from anxiety and chronic pain to PTSD and cancer? These people are our veterans, seniors, children, moms and dads, brothers, sisters and our colleagues who use a form of medicine that is considered safe and legal in 36 states, but that the federal government still classifies in the same category as heroin.










WHEN YOU SUPPORTOUR ADVERTISERS,YOU SUPPORT US.THANK YOU!
While domestic research has been sharply restricted by the federal prohibition on cannabis, a 2009 review of clinical studies conducted over a 38-year period, found that “nearly all of the 33 published controlled clinical trials conducted in the United States have shown significant and measurable benefits in subjects receiving the treatment.” Several states with medical cannabis programs have also funded academic research into cannabis health applications to further advance this important work and offer effective treatment to millions of patients who are desperate for federal health and enforcement policy to catch up.

Rather than regress into prohibitionist policies that deprive patients of medicine they need to survive and then deny those patients employment opportunities, the Biden-Harris administration must lead on medical cannabis, organizing a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the hard work that has been done by states, researchers, medical professionals and patients. Specifically, the new administration should follow the lead of other nations who are reforming their cannabis laws and regulating cannabis from a central agency, such as an Office of Medicinal Cannabis.

Establishing such a temporary or permanent federal agency responsible for leading and coordinating regulatory responsibilities associated with federal cannabis policy will be critical to realigning regulatory responsibilities so that competing department and agency agendas do not stifle advancement of critical medical cannabis research. Among Office of Medicinal Cannabis responsibilities would be working with the United States Office of Personnel Management to ensure that federal hiring laws catch up with the times relative to the work of a super-majority of states on medical cannabis.

If this Congress or this administration wants smart, capable and dedicated staff to carry forward the important work of the American people, it must acknowledge that many of these potential employees and contractors hail from one of the states with medical cannabis laws firmly in place. Qualified cannabis patients applying for federal work are like any other applicant relying on some form of federally-sanctioned medicine to treat their health conditions, with the only exception being that this administration is choosing to discriminate against them in hiring. How can an administration so focused on removing systemic equity fail so monumentally in extending employment equity to qualified medical cannabis patients?

It is time for this administration to take a meaningful, comprehensive approach to cannabis as a medicine and end outdated hiring policies that affect the over 4.4 million current medical cannabis patients.

More than a week after Americans moved forward from the tradition of setting our clocks an hour ahead for daylight savings, it is time for Biden, Harris and Acting OPM Director Kathleen McGettigan to spring forward and catch up with 44 countries that have legalized medical cannabis.

Debbie Churgai is the executive director of Americans for Safe Access, a national nonprofit medical cannabis membership organization of patients, caregivers, medical professionals, researchers and supporters.
 
How convenient. :twocents:

Biden Won’t End Marijuana-Related White House Firings Until Federal Legalization, Press Secretary Says


President Joe Biden could theoretically end the policy of firing White House staff over prior marijuana use himself, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Wednesday, but that’s not happening as long as cannabis is federally illegal.

During a press briefing, Psaki was asked why the president would allow multiple people to be terminated for admitting to using marijuana in the past as part of their background check process, especially given that Vice President Kamala Harris joked about her own cannabis consumption during her 2020 presidential run.

“Let me first say that what we tried to do as an administration was work with the security service who actually makes these determinations about suitability for serving in government in the past,” the press secretary replied. “I served in the Obama-Biden administration, the rules were actually far more stringent.”



“So that isn’t about anyone’s personal point of view—it’s about working through the process, the history and modernizing and taking steps to address the fact that marijuana is legal in a number of states across the country,” Psaki added. “It is still illegal federally.”

She also said that some of the five people who were asked to resign because they were honest about using cannabis in the past also had “other security issues that were raised,” though she did not offer specifics.

“That’s an unfortunate conclusion, of course,” she said. “But what we tried to do is enable additional members of the team who would not have been able to continue serving in past administrations to continue serving by updating our policy in coordination with the security service.”

That policy is reported to involve granting waivers to workers who’ve consumed marijuana previously, but it didn’t prevent the recently reported terminations. What’s more, The Daily Beast reported that “dozens” of staff have been punished in some form over cannabis, which also included suspensions and requirements to enter a remote work program.

In a follow up question, Psaki was pressed on whether Biden could “unilaterally” stop people from being fired solely because of prior cannabis use. She responded that “I think if marijuana was federally legal, that might be a different circumstance, but I don’t think I have any more on this for you.”

In other words, it seems like it’s going to be incumbent upon Congress to end cannabis prohibition in order for the administration to more holistically revise its employment policy with respect to marijuana.

The news of the firings has elicited bipartisan pushback, with Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) sending a letter to Biden on Monday condemning the actions and urging him to rehire those who were terminated just because they used to consume cannabis.

“Simply put, in a nation where the truth is considered malleable, we need to demonstrate to our young public servants that telling the truth is an honorable trait, not one to be punished,” he wrote. “I respectfully request that your administration discontinue punishment of staff for being honest about their prior cannabis use and reinstate otherwise qualified individuals to their posts.”

A separate letter from multiple lawmakers is expected to be delivered to the White House this week, seeking clarification on the administration’s marijuana employment policy.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), a founding member of the CCC who is leading that letter, told Marijuana Moment last week that “we still have a very uneven response” to marijuana use in the federal government and he considered the administration’s actions “antiquated” and inconsistent with the state-level reform movement.

It’s not clear at this point whether forthcoming congressional legalization legislation would remove marijuana as a negative criteria in federal employment decisions, however, as a bill that the House passed last year maintained that cannabis could still be included in drug testing programs for federal workers.

Biden personally opposes adult-use legalization but has backed more modest reforms such as legalizing for medical use, expunging prior cannabis records, rescheduling marijuana and allowing states to set their own policies.

Outside of the White House, the Office of Personnel Management said in a recent memo distributed to federal agencies that admitting to past marijuana use should not automatically disqualify people from being employed in the federal government.



And another article regarding this:

30 Members Of Congress Blast Biden’s Marijuana-Related White House Firings


A coalition of 30 members of Congress sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Thursday that criticizes the administration for terminating or otherwise punishing multiple White House staffers who admitted to past marijuana use.

The lawmakers are asking for clarification on the employment policy and urging that prior cannabis consumption no longer be used as a justification to disqualify people from serving in the federal government—especially since Vice President Kamala Harris and at least one one other Cabinet member are on record about their own marijuana use experiences.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, led the letter, which states that the lawmakers were “dismayed to learn that several White House staffers were reportedly suspended, put on probation, or asked to resign after honestly disclosing past cannabis use.”

“The American people are demanding a change to punitive and harsh cannabis laws that have always been unequally applied,” the letter states, adding that the employment policies “have been applied in inconsistent and unfair ways” given that past presidents, as well as Harris and Transportation Sec. Pete Buttigieg, have admitted to using marijuana in their youth “without consequences.”

“Those in the upper ranks of your administration won’t face consequences for their cannabis use, and nor should they, but the same standard should be applied across the administration,” it continues. “Repercussions for cannabis use have always been unequal and those with the most power have always faced the fewest consequences. We ask that you don’t allow that pattern to continue within your administration.”

“While we work to deschedule cannabis legislatively, your administration should act within its power to stop legitimizing unfair cannabis laws. You have previously expressed your commitment to decriminalizing cannabis in acknowledgement that a cannabis conviction or even the stigma of cannabis use can ruin lives and prevent people from voting, gaining employment, and contributing to society. You can meet this moment and help end our failed punitive policy of cannabis prohibition.”

Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA), Mondaire Jones (D-NY), Jared Huffman (D-CA) and Barbara Lee (D-CA) led the letter alongside Blumenauer. Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern (D-MA) and Small Business Committee Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) also signed on.

Other signatories include Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Steve Cohen (D-TN).

“The American people are demanding a change to punitive and harsh cannabis laws that have always been unequally applied,” the lawmakers wrote, noting the growing number of states that are enacting legalization policies.

The letter comes days after Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) sent a similar message to the presidentcondemning news of the marijuana-related firings for people who disclosed their history with cannabis on a federal form that’s required as part of the background check process.

“Simply put, in a nation where the truth is considered malleable, we need to demonstrate to our young public servants that telling the truth is an honorable trait, not one to be punished,” the congressman wrote. “I respectfully request that your administration discontinue punishment of staff for being honest about their prior cannabis use and reinstate otherwise qualified individuals to their posts.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki addressed the controversy on Wednesday, saying during a press briefing that while Biden could theoretically end the policy of firing staff over prior marijuana use himself, that’s not happening as long as cannabis is federally illegal.

“Let me first say that what we tried to do as an administration was work with the security service who actually makes these determinations about suitability for serving in government in the past,” she said. “I served in the Obama-Biden administration, the rules were actually far more stringent.”

While Psaki tried to make the case that the current policy under this administration is more lenient and involves granting waivers to workers who’ve consumed marijuana previously, that didn’t prevent the recently reported terminations.

In a follow up question, Psaki was pressed on whether Biden could “unilaterally” stop people from being fired solely because of prior cannabis use. She responded that “I think if marijuana was federally legal, that might be a different circumstance, but I don’t think I have any more on this for you.”

In other words, it seems like it’s going to be incumbent upon Congress to end cannabis prohibition in order for the administration to more holistically revise its employment policy with respect to marijuana.

Blumenauer told Marijuana Moment last week that “we still have a very uneven response” to marijuana use in the federal government and he considered the administration’s actions “antiquated” and inconsistent with the state-level reform movement.

It’s not clear at this point whether forthcoming congressional legalization legislation would remove marijuana as a negative criteria in federal employment decisions, however, as a bill that the House passed last year maintained that cannabis could still be included in drug testing programs for federal workers.

Biden personally opposes adult-use legalization but has backed more modest reforms such as legalizing for medical use, expunging prior cannabis records, rescheduling marijuana and allowing states to set their own policies.

Outside of the White House, the Office of Personnel Management said in a recent memo distributed to federal agencies that admitting to past marijuana use should not automatically disqualify people from being employed in the federal government.

Read the new letter to Biden on the marijuana-related White House firings by following title link and scrolling to the bottom of the article.
 
How convenient. :twocents:

Biden Won’t End Marijuana-Related White House Firings Until Federal Legalization, Press Secretary Says


President Joe Biden could theoretically end the policy of firing White House staff over prior marijuana use himself, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Wednesday, but that’s not happening as long as cannabis is federally illegal.

During a press briefing, Psaki was asked why the president would allow multiple people to be terminated for admitting to using marijuana in the past as part of their background check process, especially given that Vice President Kamala Harris joked about her own cannabis consumption during her 2020 presidential run.

“Let me first say that what we tried to do as an administration was work with the security service who actually makes these determinations about suitability for serving in government in the past,” the press secretary replied. “I served in the Obama-Biden administration, the rules were actually far more stringent.”



“So that isn’t about anyone’s personal point of view—it’s about working through the process, the history and modernizing and taking steps to address the fact that marijuana is legal in a number of states across the country,” Psaki added. “It is still illegal federally.”

She also said that some of the five people who were asked to resign because they were honest about using cannabis in the past also had “other security issues that were raised,” though she did not offer specifics.

“That’s an unfortunate conclusion, of course,” she said. “But what we tried to do is enable additional members of the team who would not have been able to continue serving in past administrations to continue serving by updating our policy in coordination with the security service.”

That policy is reported to involve granting waivers to workers who’ve consumed marijuana previously, but it didn’t prevent the recently reported terminations. What’s more, The Daily Beast reported that “dozens” of staff have been punished in some form over cannabis, which also included suspensions and requirements to enter a remote work program.

In a follow up question, Psaki was pressed on whether Biden could “unilaterally” stop people from being fired solely because of prior cannabis use. She responded that “I think if marijuana was federally legal, that might be a different circumstance, but I don’t think I have any more on this for you.”

In other words, it seems like it’s going to be incumbent upon Congress to end cannabis prohibition in order for the administration to more holistically revise its employment policy with respect to marijuana.

The news of the firings has elicited bipartisan pushback, with Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) sending a letter to Biden on Monday condemning the actions and urging him to rehire those who were terminated just because they used to consume cannabis.

“Simply put, in a nation where the truth is considered malleable, we need to demonstrate to our young public servants that telling the truth is an honorable trait, not one to be punished,” he wrote. “I respectfully request that your administration discontinue punishment of staff for being honest about their prior cannabis use and reinstate otherwise qualified individuals to their posts.”

A separate letter from multiple lawmakers is expected to be delivered to the White House this week, seeking clarification on the administration’s marijuana employment policy.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), a founding member of the CCC who is leading that letter, told Marijuana Moment last week that “we still have a very uneven response” to marijuana use in the federal government and he considered the administration’s actions “antiquated” and inconsistent with the state-level reform movement.

It’s not clear at this point whether forthcoming congressional legalization legislation would remove marijuana as a negative criteria in federal employment decisions, however, as a bill that the House passed last year maintained that cannabis could still be included in drug testing programs for federal workers.

Biden personally opposes adult-use legalization but has backed more modest reforms such as legalizing for medical use, expunging prior cannabis records, rescheduling marijuana and allowing states to set their own policies.

Outside of the White House, the Office of Personnel Management said in a recent memo distributed to federal agencies that admitting to past marijuana use should not automatically disqualify people from being employed in the federal government.



And another article regarding this:

30 Members Of Congress Blast Biden’s Marijuana-Related White House Firings


A coalition of 30 members of Congress sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Thursday that criticizes the administration for terminating or otherwise punishing multiple White House staffers who admitted to past marijuana use.

The lawmakers are asking for clarification on the employment policy and urging that prior cannabis consumption no longer be used as a justification to disqualify people from serving in the federal government—especially since Vice President Kamala Harris and at least one one other Cabinet member are on record about their own marijuana use experiences.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, led the letter, which states that the lawmakers were “dismayed to learn that several White House staffers were reportedly suspended, put on probation, or asked to resign after honestly disclosing past cannabis use.”

“The American people are demanding a change to punitive and harsh cannabis laws that have always been unequally applied,” the letter states, adding that the employment policies “have been applied in inconsistent and unfair ways” given that past presidents, as well as Harris and Transportation Sec. Pete Buttigieg, have admitted to using marijuana in their youth “without consequences.”

“Those in the upper ranks of your administration won’t face consequences for their cannabis use, and nor should they, but the same standard should be applied across the administration,” it continues. “Repercussions for cannabis use have always been unequal and those with the most power have always faced the fewest consequences. We ask that you don’t allow that pattern to continue within your administration.”

“While we work to deschedule cannabis legislatively, your administration should act within its power to stop legitimizing unfair cannabis laws. You have previously expressed your commitment to decriminalizing cannabis in acknowledgement that a cannabis conviction or even the stigma of cannabis use can ruin lives and prevent people from voting, gaining employment, and contributing to society. You can meet this moment and help end our failed punitive policy of cannabis prohibition.”

Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA), Mondaire Jones (D-NY), Jared Huffman (D-CA) and Barbara Lee (D-CA) led the letter alongside Blumenauer. Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern (D-MA) and Small Business Committee Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) also signed on.

Other signatories include Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Steve Cohen (D-TN).

“The American people are demanding a change to punitive and harsh cannabis laws that have always been unequally applied,” the lawmakers wrote, noting the growing number of states that are enacting legalization policies.

The letter comes days after Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) sent a similar message to the presidentcondemning news of the marijuana-related firings for people who disclosed their history with cannabis on a federal form that’s required as part of the background check process.

“Simply put, in a nation where the truth is considered malleable, we need to demonstrate to our young public servants that telling the truth is an honorable trait, not one to be punished,” the congressman wrote. “I respectfully request that your administration discontinue punishment of staff for being honest about their prior cannabis use and reinstate otherwise qualified individuals to their posts.”

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki addressed the controversy on Wednesday, saying during a press briefing that while Biden could theoretically end the policy of firing staff over prior marijuana use himself, that’s not happening as long as cannabis is federally illegal.

“Let me first say that what we tried to do as an administration was work with the security service who actually makes these determinations about suitability for serving in government in the past,” she said. “I served in the Obama-Biden administration, the rules were actually far more stringent.”

While Psaki tried to make the case that the current policy under this administration is more lenient and involves granting waivers to workers who’ve consumed marijuana previously, that didn’t prevent the recently reported terminations.

In a follow up question, Psaki was pressed on whether Biden could “unilaterally” stop people from being fired solely because of prior cannabis use. She responded that “I think if marijuana was federally legal, that might be a different circumstance, but I don’t think I have any more on this for you.”

In other words, it seems like it’s going to be incumbent upon Congress to end cannabis prohibition in order for the administration to more holistically revise its employment policy with respect to marijuana.

Blumenauer told Marijuana Moment last week that “we still have a very uneven response” to marijuana use in the federal government and he considered the administration’s actions “antiquated” and inconsistent with the state-level reform movement.

It’s not clear at this point whether forthcoming congressional legalization legislation would remove marijuana as a negative criteria in federal employment decisions, however, as a bill that the House passed last year maintained that cannabis could still be included in drug testing programs for federal workers.

Biden personally opposes adult-use legalization but has backed more modest reforms such as legalizing for medical use, expunging prior cannabis records, rescheduling marijuana and allowing states to set their own policies.

Outside of the White House, the Office of Personnel Management said in a recent memo distributed to federal agencies that admitting to past marijuana use should not automatically disqualify people from being employed in the federal government.

Read the new letter to Biden on the marijuana-related White House firings by following title link and scrolling to the bottom of the article.

They are just following the science.
 
Funny.... I would have sworn he took to social media right before the election and told the young voters to get out there and vote... that he was going to legalize marijuana. Was that a dream?

Biden’s Opposition To Marijuana Legalization ‘Has Not Changed,’ Press Secretary Says


President Joe Biden’s stance on marijuana legalization “has not changed,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday.

Asked whether the president supports efforts by Democratic senators to end federal cannabis prohibition, Psaki said Biden “spoke about this on the campaign” and that he “believes in decriminalizing the use of marijuana, but his position has not changed” on broader reform.



She seems to be indirectly saying that Biden wouldn’t support the bill being drafted by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Finance Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).

While the text of that legislation hasn’t been released, the expectation is that it will, at a minimum, federally deschedule marijuana. Biden, meanwhile, backs modestly rescheduling the plant, decriminalizing possession, legalizing medical cannabis, expunging prior marijuana records and letting states set their own policies.

Whether the president would veto a legalization bill if it arrived on his desk is another question.

Psaki’s latest comments come amid ongoing scrutiny of the administration’s employment policies with respect to cannabis.

A growing number of Democratic and Republican lawmakers have criticized the Biden administration’s decision to fire or otherwise punish dozens of staffers who admitted to prior marijuana use as part of their background check process.

A coalition of 30 Democratic members of Congress sent a letter to Biden last week that asks for clarification on the employment policy and urges that prior cannabis consumption no longer be used as a justification to disqualify people from serving in the federal government—especially since Vice President Kamala Harris and at least one one other Cabinet member are on record about their own marijuana use experiences.

“Those in the upper ranks of your administration won’t face consequences for their cannabis use, and nor should they, but the same standard should be applied across the administration,” the letter, led by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), states. “Repercussions for cannabis use have always been unequal and those with the most power have always faced the fewest consequences. We ask that you don’t allow that pattern to continue within your administration.”

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) said in a statement to Marijuana Moment that the “federal government has completely screwed up marijuana reform.”

Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) sent a similar message to the president last week in a separate letter condemning news of the marijuana-related firings for people who disclosed their previous cannabis use.

“Simply put, in a nation where the truth is considered malleable, we need to demonstrate to our young public servants that telling the truth is an honorable trait, not one to be punished,” the congressman wrote. “I respectfully request that your administration discontinue punishment of staff for being honest about their prior cannabis use and reinstate otherwise qualified individuals to their posts.”

Blumenauer told Marijuana Moment last week that “we still have a very uneven response” to marijuana use in the federal government and he considered the administration’s actions “antiquated” and inconsistent with the state-level reform movement.

Psaki has previously attempted to minimize the fallout, with not much success, and so her office released a new statement last week stipulating that nobody was fired for “marijuana usage from years ago,” nor has anyone been terminated “due to casual or infrequent use during the prior 12 months.”

“The policy has allowed around a dozen White House staff to continue serving the in the administration who would not have permitted under prior administrations’ policies,” reads the statement, which was provided to Playboy reporter Brian Karem.

Only five White House employees have lost their jobs over prior cannabis consumption since Biden took over, Psaki has said. However, she’s consistently declined to speak to the extent to which staff have been suspended or placed in a remote work program because they were honest about their history with marijuana on a federal form that’s part of the background check process—and the new statement sheds no light on that.

The press secretary also argued last week that the Biden administration has instituted a more lax employment policy when it comes to previous cannabis use when compared to his predecessors. But while the president could unilaterally make it so prior marijuana consumption doesn’t justify termination, she signaled he wouldn’t do so unless Congress ends federal prohibition.
 

Decriminalization is not legalization..... just saying.... :cool:

Schumer Says Bill To Legalize Marijuana Federally Will Be Filed ‘Shortly’


Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said on Wednesday that a bill to federally legalize marijuana will be introduced imminently in the Senate.

He made the comments on the same day that the governor of his home state signed a bill to legalize adult-use cannabis in New York, making possession of up to three ounces of marijuana by adults 21 and older immediately lawful.

“I support decriminalization at the federal level,” Schumer said, “and we’ll be introducing legislation with a few of my colleagues shortly.”

Asked to clarify whether he supports legalization, Schumer replied, “decriminalization, legalization,” implying that the two terms are used interchangeably.

“At the federal level, you call it ‘decriminalization’ because that lets the states legalize,” he said. But in general, advocates draw a distinction between the terms, with decriminalization usually being used to describe state or local policies that simply remove the threat of incarceration for simple possession while fines or other penalties could still be levied, which is distinct from outright legalization.

“The Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act legalizing marijuana is now law in New York,” Schumer tweeted separately on Wednesday. “And I will keep working in the Senate to end the federal prohibition on marijuana and undo the damage of the War on Drugs.”

The majority leader has teamed up this session with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) to craft legislation to end federal cannabis prohibition. They started by holding a meeting with representatives from a variety of advocacy groups to gain feedback on the best approach to the reform.

While the text of the bill hasn’t been filed yet and few details have been discussed, it’s expected to remove marijuana from the list of federally controlled substances and promote social equity.

Schumer made a point earlier this month to say that it will specifically seek to restrict the ability of large alcohol and tobacco companies to overtake the industry.

Instead, it will prioritize small businesses, particularly those owned by people from communities most impacted by prohibition, and focus on “justice, justice, justice—as well as freedom,” he said.

He also urged voters to reach out to their congressional representatives and tell them that “this is long overdue.”

Schumer, who also included cannabis legalization as a legislative priority in a recent fundraising email to his list of supporters, said that the American people recognize that prohibition has failed and “so many lives have been wasted because marijuana has been listed as something as bad as heroin” under federal law.

On the House side, Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) said recently that he plans to reintroduced his legalization bill, the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, which cleared the chamber last year but did not advance in the Senate under GOP control.

Now that Democrats have the majority in both chambers, as well as the White House, there’s a sense of optimism among advocates that comprehensive reform is achievable in this Congress.

But with respect to the White House, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday that President Joe Biden’s position on adult-use legalization “has not changed,” meaning he still opposes the policy. He hasn’t said whether he would sign or veto a bill to enact the policy change if it arrived on his desk, however.

The president instead backs modestly rescheduling the plant, decriminalizing possession, legalizing medical cannabis, expunging prior marijuana records and letting states set their own policies.
 
Decriminalization is not legalization..... just saying.... :cool:
Asked to clarify whether he supports legalization, Schumer replied, “decriminalization, legalization,” implying that the two terms are used interchangeably.
The truly sad part is that I no longer expect anything more competent or intelligent from our professional political class.
 

Biden Is Too Busy To Decriminalize Marijuana, Harris Says


Vice President Kamala Harris says the Biden administration isn’t focused on following through on its marijuana reform pledges because it’s too overwhelmed with responding to the coronavirus pandemic.

In an interview with The San Francisco Chronicle, the vice president was asked about cannabis policy and said “we haven’t yet taken that on” despite campaign promises to push for reforms like decriminalization and expunging prior marijuana records.

“Honestly, right now, we’ve been focused on getting people food, helping them stay in their apartments or in their homes, getting kids back to school, getting shots into arms,” she said. “That has been all-consuming.”

This is the first time either Harris or President Joe Biden has publicly talked about cannabis since the November election.

But while it’s the case that the administration has prioritized addressing the COVID-19 crisis, it’s also true that the president has undertaken efforts on other issues such as the environment, infrastructure and immigration—all things that were the subject of campaign pledges that have now begun being translated into action.

Marijuana, on the other hand, has taken a back seat.

Advocates have argued that cannabis policy and coronavirus relief are not mutually exclusive. For one, ending federal marijuana prohibition could free up more states to set up tax-and-regulate systems for cannabis, creating needed jobs and revenue to aid in their economic recovery.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) last year defended House Democrats’ decision to include language in a COVID package that would protect banks that service the marijuana industry from being penalized by federal regulators. She said cannabis “is a therapy that has proven successful.”

Beyond that, providing those protections would help marijuana businesses access the banking system, meaning they could stop relying on cash transactions that puts workers and consumers at greater risk of being infected with the virus.

Legalization would also reduce unneeded police interactions and incarcerations that can play a role in spreading the virus.

Those arguments notwithstanding, Harris’s new comments represent another sign that cannabis reform is not seen as a priority by this administration.

Biden’s opposition to adult-use legalization “has not changed,” the White House press secretary said recently. The administration has also faced controversy after it was reported that multiple staffers were fired or otherwise punished for admitting to prior cannabis use as part of the background check process.

Harris, meanwhile, might have adopted the president’s views on cannabis, according to Bloomberg. While she sponsored a comprehensive legalization bill during her time in the Senate, she went silent on the issue since joining Biden’s ticket and more pivoted to discussing his plans to decriminalize, rather than legalize, while campaigning.

Taken together, the administration’s lack of focus on cannabis has come as a disappointment to advocates. But in the absence of White House action, Congress has made time for marijuana and could bring legislation to the fore soon.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) says a bill to end federal marijuana prohibition will be released “shortly,” and House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) plans to reintroduce his proposal, the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, as well.
 

Biden Is Too Busy To Decriminalize Marijuana, Harris Says


Vice President Kamala Harris says the Biden administration isn’t focused on following through on its marijuana reform pledges because it’s too overwhelmed with responding to the coronavirus pandemic.

In an interview with The San Francisco Chronicle, the vice president was asked about cannabis policy and said “we haven’t yet taken that on” despite campaign promises to push for reforms like decriminalization and expunging prior marijuana records.

“Honestly, right now, we’ve been focused on getting people food, helping them stay in their apartments or in their homes, getting kids back to school, getting shots into arms,” she said. “That has been all-consuming.”

This is the first time either Harris or President Joe Biden has publicly talked about cannabis since the November election.

But while it’s the case that the administration has prioritized addressing the COVID-19 crisis, it’s also true that the president has undertaken efforts on other issues such as the environment, infrastructure and immigration—all things that were the subject of campaign pledges that have now begun being translated into action.

Marijuana, on the other hand, has taken a back seat.

Advocates have argued that cannabis policy and coronavirus relief are not mutually exclusive. For one, ending federal marijuana prohibition could free up more states to set up tax-and-regulate systems for cannabis, creating needed jobs and revenue to aid in their economic recovery.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) last year defended House Democrats’ decision to include language in a COVID package that would protect banks that service the marijuana industry from being penalized by federal regulators. She said cannabis “is a therapy that has proven successful.”

Beyond that, providing those protections would help marijuana businesses access the banking system, meaning they could stop relying on cash transactions that puts workers and consumers at greater risk of being infected with the virus.

Legalization would also reduce unneeded police interactions and incarcerations that can play a role in spreading the virus.

Those arguments notwithstanding, Harris’s new comments represent another sign that cannabis reform is not seen as a priority by this administration.

Biden’s opposition to adult-use legalization “has not changed,” the White House press secretary said recently. The administration has also faced controversy after it was reported that multiple staffers were fired or otherwise punished for admitting to prior cannabis use as part of the background check process.

Harris, meanwhile, might have adopted the president’s views on cannabis, according to Bloomberg. While she sponsored a comprehensive legalization bill during her time in the Senate, she went silent on the issue since joining Biden’s ticket and more pivoted to discussing his plans to decriminalize, rather than legalize, while campaigning.

Taken together, the administration’s lack of focus on cannabis has come as a disappointment to advocates. But in the absence of White House action, Congress has made time for marijuana and could bring legislation to the fore soon.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) says a bill to end federal marijuana prohibition will be released “shortly,” and House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) plans to reintroduce his proposal, the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, as well.
1617982295743.png
 

New Poll Shows Almost 70% of Americans Want Legal Cannabis—More Than Ever Before


According to a recent poll, across the country, more Americans want legal cannabis now than ever before.






The national polling data was put together by Quinnipiac University. This is the highest level of support ever reported in a nationwide survey and marks an even bigger shift in cannabis acceptance. The poll was directed by Doug Schwartz, Ph. D., and was based on random samples of adults using random digit dialing with live interviewers. The study has been conducted this way since 1994 and is considered independent and non-partisan.


According to the numbers, about seven in ten Americans believed that cannabis should be legal in the U.S. at the time of polling. Sixty-nine percent of those polled shared their support, and when looking just at registered voters, 70 percent are in favor. This number is up 19 percent from 2012 when the poll was first taken.


“There is no buyer’s remorse on the part of the American people. In the era of state-level legalization, voters’ support for this issue has grown rapidly—an indication that these policy changes have been successful and are comporting with voters’ desires and expectations,” NORML’s Executive Director Erik Altieri said. “Today, voters of every age and in virtually every region of the country agree that marijuana should be legal. We have a mandate from the American people and we intend to make sure that elected officials abide by it.”


Across Party Lines, Americans Want Legal Cannabis


This poll is also a big deal because support for legalization is more and more becoming a non-partisan issue in the United States. Sixty-two percent of Republicans, 67 percent of Independents and 78 percent of Democrats back legalizing cannabis. While Democrats are still in the lead in terms of legalization support, the other two groups are quickly catching up.


However, this non-partisan split is not being reflected through elected officials, as Democrats are still by and large the only group to support issues. Republicans still often vote against cannabis legislation. The recent legalization efforts in New Jersey, New York, Virginia, and New Mexico were all thanks to Democrats and received almost no Republican support.


Still, despite that setback, the Quinnipiac data showed that cannabis is increasingly being supported by Americans of all ages, not just young people. While the percentage of support is the highest among young and middle-age people, at 78 percent for those between the ages of 18 and 49, there is still support from older groups. Those 50 to 64 support cannabis at a rate of 72 percent, and even folks 65 and older give 51 percent support to legalization.


This is not the first time this data is being offered up. Other polls have shown similar results, and the national push for federal legalization, as well as more and more states becoming legal, is also proof of the growing acceptance for cannabis in America. However, this poll is significant because it shows more support than any data before. Since the numbers seem to indicate that Americans want legal cannabis, elected officials would do well to take note and start to implement changes that reflect the will of the people.
 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top