Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law United Kingdom

UK Gov Petition to call a referendum for the legalisation of cannabis in the UK
(https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/214030)

It is clear that the cannabis debate is not going away and given that the current conservative government understand the meaning of democracy by giving a referendum to the public on our membership of the E.U it should give the public a referendum on cannabis legalisation and let the public decide.

I doubt this petition will make any difference but its good to keep the pressure on.
 
This is good news even if the UK government was dragged kicking and screaming every inch of the way by the press and popular opinion.

Medicinal cannabis products to be legalised

Specialist doctors in the UK will be able to legally prescribe cannabis-derived medicinal products by autumn, the home secretary has announced.

Those that meet safety and quality standards are to be made legal for patients with an "exceptional clinical need", Sajid Javid said.

It follows high-profile cases involving children with severe epilepsy being denied access to cannabis oil.

Others forms of cannabis will remain illegal.

'Exceptional circumstances'
Mr Javid's decision was made after the chief medical officer for England, Prof Dame Sally Davies, and the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs said patients with certain medical conditions should be given access to the treatments.

Their advice was part of a review into medicinal cannabis launched by the home secretary following an outcry over Billy Caldwell and Alfie Dingley being denied access to cannabis oil.

The parents of the boys, who have rare forms of epilepsy, say it controls their seizures.

Image copyright Reuters
Image caption Charlotte Caldwell said her son, Billy, would now be able to live a "normal life"
The Home Office recently granted them licences to access the treatments.

Mr Javid said: "Recent cases involving sick children made it clear to me that our position on cannabis-related medicinal products was not satisfactory.

"That is why we launched a review and set up an expert panel to advise on licence applications in exceptional circumstances.

"This will help patients with an exceptional clinical need but is in no way a first step to the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use."

'Birthday present'
Billy Caldwell's mother, Charlotte, said Mr Javid's announcement had been made on her son's 13th birthday.

"For the first time in months I'm almost lost for words, other than 'thank you Sajid Javid'," she said.

"Never has Billy received a better birthday present, and never from somebody so unexpected...

"But, crucially, my little boy Billy can now live a normal life with his mummy because of the simple ability to now administer a couple of drops a day of a long-maligned but entirely effective natural medication."

Image copyright Gareth Fuller/PA Wire
Image caption The government and medicines regulator are to develop a clear definition of what constitutes a cannabis-derived medicinal product
Cannabis is classed as a Schedule 1 drug, meaning it is judged to have no therapeutic value but can be used for the purposes of research with a Home Office licence.

The decision by the Home Office will put certain cannabis-derived products into Schedule 2 - those that have a potential medical use - and will place them in the same category as cocaine and heroin, among other drugs.

The Department for Health and Social Care and the Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) will now develop a clear definition of what constitutes a cannabis-derived medicinal product so they can be rescheduled and prescribed, the Home Office said.

In the meantime, clinicians will still be able to apply to an independent expert panel on behalf of patients wishing to access these products.

The home secretary said licence fees for applications made to the panel will be waived, and those already granted will not be charged.

'Safer medicines'
The home secretary's decision was welcomed by campaigners and health experts.

Donna Kinnair, from the Royal College of Nursing, said the decision was "very welcome".

Dr Tom Freeman, senior academic fellow at King's College London, said Mr Javid's decision would have a "substantial impact on research by facilitating the development of safer and more effective medicines".

Former justice minister Sir Mike Penning, who was among those appealing for Alfie Dingley to be given a special licence for medicinal cannabis, welcomed the announcement but said there were still unanswered questions about which treatments would be rescheduled.

"Any move to restrict medical cannabis in the UK to a very narrow range of derived products, each requiring full pharmaceutical trials, thereby blocking out the many products available overseas, will lead to great disappointment and be a missed opportunity."
 
I truly am surprised by the UK government position on MJ. That type of illogical hysteria and prohibitionist tendencies seems to be more common in my country, the USA, but we seem to be leading in legalization.

I'm not, they are following their usual MO and protecting their own interests. They have capital tied up in pharma and cannabis exports. They aren't going to relax their stranglehold until they are forced to. That's why it's so important to keep up the pressure and push for further relaxing of the laws to cover more medical conditions.

A referendum would be nice but personally I can't see it happening, not after the whole brexit fiasco. Sure ask people who know nothing of euro politics, economics or foreign affairs to vote on the future of their country but what ever you do don't ask them about legalising an ancient and freely available medicinal plant. It might send the wrong message :doh:
 
This is good news even if the UK government was dragged kicking and screaming every inch of the way by the press and popular opinion.

Medicinal cannabis products to be legalised

Specialist doctors in the UK will be able to legally prescribe cannabis-derived medicinal products by autumn, the home secretary has announced.

Those that meet safety and quality standards are to be made legal for patients with an "exceptional clinical need", Sajid Javid said.

It follows high-profile cases involving children with severe epilepsy being denied access to cannabis oil.

Others forms of cannabis will remain illegal.

'Exceptional circumstances'
Mr Javid's decision was made after the chief medical officer for England, Prof Dame Sally Davies, and the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs said patients with certain medical conditions should be given access to the treatments.

Their advice was part of a review into medicinal cannabis launched by the home secretary following an outcry over Billy Caldwell and Alfie Dingley being denied access to cannabis oil.

The parents of the boys, who have rare forms of epilepsy, say it controls their seizures.

Image copyright Reuters
Image caption Charlotte Caldwell said her son, Billy, would now be able to live a "normal life"
The Home Office recently granted them licences to access the treatments.

Mr Javid said: "Recent cases involving sick children made it clear to me that our position on cannabis-related medicinal products was not satisfactory.

"That is why we launched a review and set up an expert panel to advise on licence applications in exceptional circumstances.

"This will help patients with an exceptional clinical need but is in no way a first step to the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use."

'Birthday present'
Billy Caldwell's mother, Charlotte, said Mr Javid's announcement had been made on her son's 13th birthday.

"For the first time in months I'm almost lost for words, other than 'thank you Sajid Javid'," she said.

"Never has Billy received a better birthday present, and never from somebody so unexpected...

"But, crucially, my little boy Billy can now live a normal life with his mummy because of the simple ability to now administer a couple of drops a day of a long-maligned but entirely effective natural medication."

Image copyright Gareth Fuller/PA Wire
Image caption The government and medicines regulator are to develop a clear definition of what constitutes a cannabis-derived medicinal product
Cannabis is classed as a Schedule 1 drug, meaning it is judged to have no therapeutic value but can be used for the purposes of research with a Home Office licence.

The decision by the Home Office will put certain cannabis-derived products into Schedule 2 - those that have a potential medical use - and will place them in the same category as cocaine and heroin, among other drugs.

The Department for Health and Social Care and the Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) will now develop a clear definition of what constitutes a cannabis-derived medicinal product so they can be rescheduled and prescribed, the Home Office said.

In the meantime, clinicians will still be able to apply to an independent expert panel on behalf of patients wishing to access these products.

The home secretary said licence fees for applications made to the panel will be waived, and those already granted will not be charged.

'Safer medicines'
The home secretary's decision was welcomed by campaigners and health experts.

Donna Kinnair, from the Royal College of Nursing, said the decision was "very welcome".

Dr Tom Freeman, senior academic fellow at King's College London, said Mr Javid's decision would have a "substantial impact on research by facilitating the development of safer and more effective medicines".

Former justice minister Sir Mike Penning, who was among those appealing for Alfie Dingley to be given a special licence for medicinal cannabis, welcomed the announcement but said there were still unanswered questions about which treatments would be rescheduled.

"Any move to restrict medical cannabis in the UK to a very narrow range of derived products, each requiring full pharmaceutical trials, thereby blocking out the many products available overseas, will lead to great disappointment and be a missed opportunity."
Good new's!
 
Anti-prohibition police commissioners targeted by Conservatives (https://ukcsc.co.uk)

The Daily Telegraph has run an article saying that “police have been accused of giving tacit support to ‘cannabis clubs’ where paying members can meet and take the drug without fear of prosecution”.
Claiming that “police leaders have been rebuked by the Government”, the paper quotes a Home Office spokesman who says: “The trade and possession of recreational cannabis is illegal in the UK, regardless of where you use it,” said the spokesman.

“Scientific and medical evidence is clear that recreational cannabis use can cause harm to individuals and society. Those using it should be in no doubt that if they are caught they face prosecution and a maximum jail term of five years.

“How police choose to pursue investigations is an operational decision for Chief Constables, but we are clear that we expect them to enforce the law.”

The paper targets two Police and Crime Commissioners who “have visited or endorsed the clubs”, Arfon Jones of North Wales Police and Hardyal Dhindsa of Derbyshire.

It is well known that police have deprioritised targeting low-level cannabis possession, partly because of shrinking budgets and falling staff numbers. The article infers that there was an explosion of cannabis clubs because the police allowed it, when of course the real reason was because of the need for access to medication.

Jones, who visited the Teesside UKCSC last year, is quoted: “I wanted to see how it was run. The members bring their own cannabis – it isn’t grown on the premises and they’re not dealing or supplying.

“There are 150 members paying £35 a year and why not? There are pubs and clubs where people go and drink alcohol so why shouldn’t consenting adults be able to use cannabis recreationally and without causing anyone any harm. The location is such that there is no NIMBYism.”

dhindsa-516x365.jpg
Dhindsa (left), who is also the national lead on substance misuse, has called for a national policy on cannabis clubs to be introduced. He said: “The war on drugs is not working. My job is to find good practice for enforcement and treatment, and trying to find consensus. Unfortunately in this area there is not really a consensus.

“I personally, as the national lead, will look into this to see what the extent of the activity is with these clubs and how police forces have responded to this activity.”

But the paper also quotes National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead for Drugs, Commander Simon Bray, who said: “The possession of cannabis at so-called cannabis clubs is a criminal offence. It is a matter for chief constables, in liaison with their police crime commissioners, to determine the operational priorities for their force. Likewise, chief constables will determine how they address local crime issues of concern.”

The paper asked UKCSC chairman Greg de Hoedt about the clubs. He explained that he started the network after being diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and finding that, after travelling to the US, only cannabis put it into remission.

He said: “I was invited out by people who ran a dispensary and they gave me two grams of oil a day. Within six months I had a full bill of health. When I came back here I set up cannabis social club to show an alternative way that things can be done.

“If they can grow it, or have the ability to grow it, they can grow it and share it between a group of members at a fair trade cost, then that’s what they do.”

“We aren’t doing it for money, it’s not for the profit, it is so people have a safe product. Prohibition has failed. Lets just make it safer for them.”

Not content with putting toddlers into comas the UK home office is now going after the old and the infirm. Even taking shots at their own enforcement officers for showing a modicum of restraint, compassion and of course pragmatism.
 
Police chief tells Telegraph he backs UKCSC (https://ukcsc.co.uk)

arfonjones.jpg


The Telegraph has followed up yesterday’s story on anti-prohibition police commissioners and UK Cannabis Social Clubs after Arfon Jones (pictured above), Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales, signalled his support for Spanish-style collectives where users trade home-grown cannabis products with each other.
Jones told the Telegraph he was “sympathetic” to the clubs allowing users to grow their own cannabis for “regulated consumption by their members”.

He added that authorities should focus instead on the “legal regulation of cannabis for medicinal and recreational use”.

Durham Constabulary said its officers would not be likely to search homes even if the occupants were known to be cultivating cannabis. A spokesman for the force said: “Anyone who is seen by a police officer to be smoking cannabis in County Durham and Darlington will be arrested.

“However, our officers are unlikely to apply for a warrant to search a house if they learn there is a single plant inside which is being grown for personal use.”

UKCSC chairman Greg de Hoedt told the paper that their thousands of members include magistrates, bank managers, NHS nurses and television soap actors, and that they have provided cannabis oil to the wife of an MP for medicinal purposes.

Screen-Shot-2018-08-09-at-11.03.27-394x365.png
Greg de Hoedt and Sy Dignam of Hampshire Cannabis Community and CannafamUK at Green Pride UKCSC

He pointed out that firefighters suffering from PTSD use the drug as well as ex-military members and magistrates in Sussex and Surrey.

In Middlesborough, cannabis club chairman Michael Fisher admitted members openly buy and sell the class B drug, because being in a collective “keeps the price down”.

“Cannabis will be traded between members for anything from £100 an ounce to £150 an ounce,” he said. “Street value is £200 to £280 an ounce.

“Our members in Teesside have a few collectives that they grow amongst themselves, and we have a collective that we work with as well, that grows cannabis for the members.

“The average age of our current members is around 45 years old. We have a couple of gentlemen in their 60s and one in his 70s. We have a lot of people that own their own businesses – everything from furniture to car sales to mechanics.

arfon-jones-at-teesside-with-michael-fisher-840x441.jpg


“In four years of operating we have only had one caution by police and that was for a noise complaint at the cannabis festival.”

Sy Dignam, chair of the Hampshire Cannabis Club, organised a meet of 150 people on a beach in Portsmouth last month. “The Police didn’t turn up, they never do,” he told the paper.

“If someone complains they have to come down, but the last time they came, they had a look at my stall, with my grinders and all my merchandise and said ‘We can’t smell cannabis’ and walked off.”

Cannanis Social Clubs are continuing to form in every part of the UK and an National Cannabis Social Club conference will take place in London in November this year.
 
Great article @GreenHopper thanks for the link!
I am hopeful that we will get legalisation in the UK, I think we are approaching the point where the UK authorities will see that if they don't legalise they are just going to look stupid and backward
My feeling is that once we get medical marijuana legal recreational use becomes almost inevitable.
For one thing a large percentage of people who use marijuana could easily make a good argument that they are doing so for medicinal reasons, for example could claim that without it they suffer pain or anxiety or gut problems etc.
So legal medical use would constitute legal recreational use in all but name?

I have to admit that I am heavily predisposed to Wishful Thinking on this issue and my reasoning here may not be in line with what actually happened in the USA and Canada.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Nina,

I'm hopeful in the long run the UK will arrive at some form of acceptable cannabis policy but I think we still have some way to go.

The politicians were only very recently forced to accept the concept of cannabis as a medicine for those with severe conditions. A ruling was made but the restrictions are still extremely tight with very limited access to support for doctors and patients.

It is my opinion that the lashing out at cannabis sympathetic Police Commissioners by the Conservative party is an attempt at containment. While they were forced by media attention and public scrutiny to admit cannabis has medicinal value they certainly aren't ready to accept they have a responsibility to legislature for a proper medical cannabis platform.

Key members of Parliament have financial interests in or related to the cannabis industry which poses a conflict of interest. They will do everything they can to protect their financial interest over the benefit of their constituents. To that end I suspect they will drag out the widening of the medical cannabis program to patients with other conditions, inhibit the right to grow movement and continue to demonise cannabis as a recreational commodity for some time to come.

I hope I'm wrong and that a new age of thinking is on the horizon but I have very little faith in the oligarch that runs the UK.
 
Thanks Nina,
The politicians were only very recently forced to accept the concept of cannabis as a medicine for those with severe conditions.
surely this has damaged their credibility in the minds of many people since it is now obvious that they were either lying or incapable of making proper assessments when they claimed it had no medical benefits

Key members of Parliament have financial interests in or related to the cannabis industry which poses a conflict of interest. They will do everything they can to protect their financial interest over the benefit of their constituents. To that end I suspect they will drag out the widening of the medical cannabis program to patients with other conditions, inhibit the right to grow movement and continue to demonise cannabis as a recreational commodity for some time to come. .
Indeed, but they also need the support of their constituents, they need us turkeys to keep voting for Christmas....keep smiling and agreeing as they fuck us over. There may come a point where their current position is damaging and it becomes politically expedient to end prohibition.
They may want to keep cannabis on the 'demon' list but they cant control public sentiment as precisely as they'd like to.
Whatever happens with the war on drug/prohibition etc it remains the case that humans are very attracted to the use of psycho active substances and will go to some lengths to indulge in them, this gives those in power a potent lever with which to control people, they will use it.
 
surely this has damaged their credibility in the minds of many people since it is now obvious that they were either lying or incapable of making proper assessments when they claimed it had no medical benefits

Oh Yeh for sure, apparently the last time they polled on the legalisation figures it came out as 51% in favour.

While it is possible Labour will attempt to leverage legalisation as one of their campaign points in the next election the cannabis debate isn't really a deciding factor in how the majority of people will vote. Legalisation of cannabis probably doesn't won't make the top 10 list of campaign issues of the average UK voter when there are issues like Economy, Brexit, Immigration, NHS, Housing, National Debt, Benefits, HS2, Cross Rail, Airport Expansion, Gov Backed even Broadband Expansion, etc... on the docket.

So while the current legalisation debate certainly harms the current administrations cred to some degree, in reality fucking up Brexit is far more likely to affect overall party cred. Therefore issues like Brexit are likely to overshadow any discussion of legalisation of cannabis and the Conservatives know that. While they are under some pressure from cannabis campaigners it's nothing compared to the pressure of other pressing issues.

Indeed, but they also need the support of their constituents, they need us turkeys to keep voting for Christmas....

Haha :rofl: nicely put and so very true. But again it's about the issues they can leverage to achieve public debate and cannabis legalisation, even only for medical just isn't as big of an issue as the others described above for the majority of people.

keep smiling and agreeing as they fuck us over.

That's an official policy I think :buenrollo:

There may come a point where their current position is damaging and it becomes politically expedient to end prohibition.

Maybe, I think Labour are more likely to attempt to leverage legalisation of cannabis but that doesn't mean they actually would follow through with it.

Although they seem to like taxing things (house owners aren't too please with some of the policies being banded about by the reds) so maybe :idon'tknow:

Whatever happens with the war on drug/prohibition etc it remains the case that humans are very attracted to the use of psycho active substances and will go to some lengths to indulge in them, this gives those in power a potent lever with which to control people, they will use it.

Highly (:dog:) debatable, many folk for religious or cultural reasons are still very anti mind expanding substances, some folk are just plain against mind expanding full stop. 51% in favour of legalisation means there is still 49% out there who are not in favour. Even if you don't believe the stats that's still a very median split.

Trying to guess which way the big G will flop is any ones guess but what we can say is the recent shift towards the acceptance of cannabis for medicinal purposes is an important and positive move that can only bolster the fight for legalisation. Just don't get your hopes up too high for a quick result.

In my opinion it's going to be a while yet. Until then, keep informed, keep informing and stay safe.

Nice chatting with ya.
 
UK’s Legalization of Medical Cannabis Sparks Talk of Possible Recreational Laws
Popular support is behind adult-use legalization, but U.K. officials say today’s policy shift is strictly about access to medical cannabis.

UK-MedicalMarijuana.jpg

Getty Images

The United Kingdom announced today a relaxation of its cannabis laws that will allow specialist doctors to prescribe cannabis-based products for certain patients. It’s a modest change to the U.K.’s cannabis laws. But it’s one that has already sparked a conversation on the broader legalization of cannabis for adult-use. Recent surveys put support for adult-use legalization at 59 percent. Top officials within the U.K. government, however, are denying that the rescheduling of cannabis-based medical treatments is a step toward full legalization.

U.K. Legalizes Medical Cannabis for “Unmet Clinical Needs”
This summer’s massive public outcry over a pair of high-profile instances of children being denied access to life-saving medical cannabis products has moved the needle on drug policy in the U.K. Alfie and Billy, 13 and 12 respectively, who both suffer from an extreme form of epilepsy, made headlines in July when they lost access to their medication. Both children rely on cannabis oil to reduce the intensity and frequency of their seizures. And although U.K. law had permitted individuals to petition for medical cannabis in extreme cases, Billie and Alfie had no such authorizations. In Alfie’s case, the U.K. Home office refused his parents’ licensing request. Billie had his cannabis oil confiscated when his mother returned to London from Canada, where she had to travel to obtain it legally.

In the immediate wake of the outcry, both children received those special licenses to access their medical cannabis treatments. And the issue prompted home secretary Sajid Javid to initiate a review of the U.K.’s medical cannabis policy. The review returned a number of favorable results. Ultimately, it concluded that medical cannabis had therapeutic and medical benefits and that doctors should be able to prescribe it. In light of the review’s conclusions, Javid confirmed the plan to reschedule medical cannabis in the U.K.

And on November 1, the new rule went into effect. Certain cannabis-based products are now classified “Schedule 2.” In other words, a controlled substance with “potential medical use.” The rescheduling frees up tens of thousands of U.K. doctors to prescribe cannabis. But the U.K. government is still placing major restrictions on access to the drug. For now, only those patients with an “unmet clinical need” will be eligible for cannabis prescriptions.


Who Will Be Eligible to Take and Prescribe Medical Cannabis in the U.K.?
Eligibility for cannabis-based treatments in the U.K. has nothing to do with specific qualifying conditions, as it does in many U.S. states. Rather, doctors will decide whether or not a patient has an “unmet clinical need” that cannabis can meet. Only specialists will be able to write cannabis prescriptions. There are about 80,000 specialists listed on the National Health Service website. They’ll have to make decisions on a case-by-case basis and be able to show that currently licensed medications cannot meet the patient’s clinical need. And many doctors have already stated they likely won’t issue cannabis prescriptions in any case. They say there has been next to no guidance on issuing such prescriptions. Also, policies don’t exist to support doctors if something goes wrong.

Initially, then, patient access will be limited, as will the types of cannabis products patients can legally obtain. Eligible products must fulfill three requirements. Products must be cannabis-or cannabinoid-derived, exclusively for medical purposes and fit for human consumption. And that means the exclusion of flower and most edibles. Instead, patients will be able to access cannabis products in pills, capsules, and oils.

Many questions remain about the specifics of how the rule change will play out on the ground. For now, the change is likely to impact just a small number of U.K. patients. But the U.K. public wants more. And today, they got the first significant sign that drug policy changes are indeed possible. Going forward, that could lead to serious talks about the possibility of adult-use cannabis laws.
 
Stop the NHS Denying Patients Access to Medical Cannabis
(www.change.org)

Earlier this year we won a long, hard battle to get my son Alfie Dingley, who suffers from epilepsy, access full extract medical cannabis. This fight not only helped my son, it played a big part in getting the law changed to allow access to medical cannabis under prescription in the UK.

This change came into effect on 1st Nov. With it the hopes of thousands of patients were raised. But the NHS asked the Royal College of Physicians and the British Paediatric Neurology Association to create and publish guidelines on when it should be prescribed, and the guidelines they produced are so restrictive that almost no-one will get access to medical cannabis. This is simply shattering.

The guidelines are so restrictive that if it wasn't for his special licence even my son Alfie would be refused a prescription, even though his was one of the high-profile cases that reached the heart of the nation and led to the change in the law. Thousands of patients have now had their hopes dashed and face intense disappointment and further suffering.

In particular, I know of many families with severely epileptic children who are now having to try and fundraise to go abroad to get access to the full medical cannabis that we have just made legal here! 9 year old Teagan (pictured) is currently in a London Hospital in intensive care as a result of her epilepsy. After a long struggle, doctors there have been persuaded to let her have access to a form of medical cannabis. That’s a small step in the right direction. But Emma wants her daughter to have the same kind of medical cannabis that Alfie has containing THC.

We are suddenly back to square one.

I’m worried that once my son Alfie’s temporary medical cannabis license runs out, I could be in the same situation too.

The Recommendation from the Royal College of Physicians is that there is insufficient evidence to warrant prescription for pain. That is nonsense and flies in the face of several publications and even the opinion of the Chief Medical Officer. That Recommendation effectively stops doctors prescribing. A similar non sensical situation has arisen with BPNA’s Recommendation about childhood epilepsy. Sad, unnecessary and wrong.

This is a case of the NHS and some of the medical professional bodies snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The NHS must review the guidelines immediately so patients can have access to medical cannabis. Please support Teagan and the many other patients who are suffering by signing this petition.

We still have a long way to go before the UK Gov will truly accept cannabis as a medical resource.

It appears as if the government are trying to use the new regulations to dump the issue on the doctors who themselves have little to no support on making cannabis prescription decisions. It's as if the Gov think that the new regulations absolve them from having to face the cannabis debate as they have now approved the medical use of cannabis in certain situations. However, by not putting a proper framework in place all they have done is passed the problem onto doctors who are unable to prescribe the medication for fear of falling outside an ambigeoius framework.

The struggle continues....
 
Stop the NHS Denying Patients Access to Medical Cannabis
(www.change.org)



We still have a long way to go before the UK Gov will truly accept cannabis as a medical resource.

It appears as if the government are trying to use the new regulations to dump the issue on the doctors who themselves have little to no support on making cannabis prescription decisions. It's as if the Gov think that the new regulations absolve them from having to face the cannabis debate as they have now approved the medical use of cannabis in certain situations. However, by not putting a proper framework in place all they have done is passed the problem onto doctors who are unable to prescribe the medication for fear of falling outside an ambigeoius framework.

The struggle continues....

So frustrating...
I suppose this is what happens when you have to make a complete sudden u turn...
 
First medical cannabis prescription made after change to UK law

(www.telegraph.co.uk)

full

For years, she has used cannabis illegally to control her symptoms. But in a UK first, Ms Barton was prescribed medicinal cannabis last month by Dr David McDowell, a private pain specialist.

The government must now authorise a specialist importer to procure the drug from the Netherlands.

The prescription has not been provided on the NHS, and costs £2,500 for a three-month supply.

Cannabis has been legal for medical use since November 1 after a protracted battle to downgrade its legal status.

Campaigners now say that NHS doctors are still constrained by interim guidelines which make it difficult for them to prescribe the drug.

It is understood that some doctors have put up posters telling patients not to ask them for it.

Although Ms Barton has a prescription, a ‘specials’ drug importer must now be given a licence from the Home Office to legally import medical grade cannabis from another country such as the Netherlands. It is thought that it may be weeks before she is given her medication by a pharmacy.

Ms Barton argues that the high cost of her medicine will create a “two tier system”, where most people will not be able to afford cannabis and will have to continue to source the drug illegally.

Speaking to The Telegraph, she said: “It’s momentous that this has happened. It’s the first prescription that was written since cannabis was made illegal since 1928. It’s made history, this bit of paper. “But the truth of the matter is that he’s given me a three month supply that’s going to cost me £2,500. I’m going to blow all of my savings on this initial prescription, and after this three months is up I’m going to have to go back to being a criminal, breaking the law.” “There is an unfair system where the rich will have access and the poor will still have their doors kicked in.
 
MPs block bid to legalise cannabis after current law branded 'cruel and inhuman'
(https://www.mirror.co.uk)

Parliament voted narrowly against a bill brought by Lib Dem Norman Lamb

  • BY MIKEY SMITH
  • 16:18, 11 DEC 2018
0_Liberal-Democrats-Spring-Conference-2015.jpg

(Image: MDM)
MPs have blocked a bid to legalise cannabis, after the current law was branded "cruel and inhuman."

Lib Dem MP Norman Lamb brought the 10 Minute Rule Bill because, he said, current laws "hand billions of pounds every year to organised crime."

But his Cannabis (Legalisation and Regulation) Bill failed to pass the first stage and was blocked by a 14 Conservative MPs.

Mr Lamb outlined the current "postcode lottery" of policing and highlighted the "dreadful hypocrisy" of alcohol being legal, taxed and widely enjoyed by MPs in Westminster.


0_FILE-PHOTO-An-employee-checks-cannabis-plants-at-a-medical-marijuana-plantation-in-northern-Israel.jpg

(Image: REUTERS)
He said: "Isn't there a dreadful hypocrisy that we allow our drug of choice whilst criminalising people who use another, less dangerous drug - many for the relief of pain.

"My Bill offers a more rational alternative to this mess, with strict regulation of the growing sale and marketing of cannabis - we can at last start to protect children and teenagers.


"We can start to take some of the violence and intimidation off our streets and restore order in our poorest communities, and we can free up police time to focus on serious crime.

"This is rational, evidence-based policy-making - it's time for this country to act on the evidence and protect children and young people from harm."

He added patients needing access to medicinal cannabis were still being routinely denied the drug by GPs, who were willing to prescribe more dangerous and addictive painkillers such as Fentanyl.

But Mr Lamb's Ten Minute Rule Bill was contested by Conservative MP Steve Double (St Austell and Newquay), an evangelical Christian, who said he wanted to continue the "war on drugs" and labelled cannabis "dangerous" and "a gateway drug".

Mr Double said: "We are clearly in the midst of a war on drugs, but I would say we do not win the war by raising the white flag and giving up and surrendering - no war has ever been won by surrendering.

"I believe legalising would send the wrong message to our young people that cannabis is okay to use.

"I think we all understand that for many people cannabis is a gateway drug to more serious and more damaging drugs and therefore it would be absolutely wrong to send the message that somehow cannabis is okay because where it would lead for many, many people."

"We need to do better for our young people, but giving up the war on cannabis is not the way to achieve that."

The Bill was blocked by 66 no votes to 52 ayes.

 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top