Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law The Cannabis Chronicles - Misc Cannabis News

Saw a commercial last night for botox. I guess now they use it to stop headaches? Wtf... And it said most medical insurance cover the rat poison being injected into your skin. I'm sure the doctor puts the injection into the wrinkle areas for most customer satisfaction...


Seriously how messed up that rat poison has more of a medical use then cannabis. So sick of this b.s concerning a plant that may not be a CURE ALL but most deff treats MOST.

Fuh q pharmaceutical companys putting your pockets before people in need... :smile:

Mildly infuriating:BangHead:
 
Saw a commercial last night for botox. I guess now they use it to stop headaches? Wtf... And it said most medical insurance cover the rat poison being injected into your skin. I'm sure the doctor puts the injection into the wrinkle areas for most customer satisfaction...


Seriously how messed up that rat poison has more of a medical use then cannabis. So sick of this b.s concerning a plant that may not be a CURE ALL but most deff treats MOST.

Fuh q pharmaceutical companys putting your pockets before people in need... :smile:

Mildly infuriating:BangHead:

While on holiday in America I was shocked, absolutely shocked, at the medical adverts on the tv...we just dont have that here...
Persuading people to take things they almost certainly don't need...
Then at the end the quick voice says a load of stuff, including "may cause heart failure and/or death".... what the hell...???
Our jaws hit the floor...

You sell pharmaceuticals like some sort of fashion accessory...
Unbelievable to me.......
 
Last edited:
While on holiday in America I was shocked, absolutely shocked, at the medical adverts on the tv...we just dont have that hear...
Persuading people to take things they almost certainly don't need...
Then at the end the quick voice says a load of stuff, including "may cause heart failure and/or death".... what the hell...???
Our jaws hit the floor...

You sell pharmaceuticals like some sort of fashion accessory...
Unbelievable to me.......
It's disgusting. Where is the smart fellow who made a mmj commerical. "Side effects may include hunger and a good night's sleep. May cause friendships with loving people who care about you"
 

The Marijuana Machine Rolls Ahead

The billion-dollar bud faces new momentum and problems as three more states legalize it.

Since Colorado legalized recreational marijuana in 2012, seven other states and the District of Columbia have followed suit. Next year, California, Maine, and Massachusetts will begin sales, potentially tripling the size of the legal pot market. By the end of 2018, 20 percent of Americans will live in a state where adults can legally buy and sell cannabis. Yet big problems remain unresolved, including a persistent black market that legalization was supposed to help undermine. There are also fights between states in favor of legalizing weed and localities that oppose it. And of course marijuana remains illegal under federal law, casting a shadow over the industry.

State tax revenue from marijuana sales exceeds $1 billion. California alone anticipates another $1 billion in annual tax revenue from legalization. But with an impending January 2018 deadline to begin issuing permits, there are signs that growers and retailers may not join the state-regulated system. Hezekiah Allen, executive director of the California Growers Association, estimates that just 3,500 of 40,000 farmers have signed up for permits but says that’s primarily because local governments haven’t issued them or have banned marijuana businesses outright.

This creates problems for state regulators. “We have to work with over 500 different cities and counties over the state,” says Lori Ajax, chief of California’s Bureau of Cannabis Control. “For us to issue a license, we have to make sure it’s not in violation of a city or county ordinance, and because of our size, that’s a challenge.”

California grows 13.5 million pounds of marijuana annually; less than 20 percent of it is consumed there. Growers may have to downsize as new rules ban out-of-state exports. If California’s markets open in January and many existing growers are left out, tax revenue could fall short, and a robust black market will persist. To become legal, marijuana businesses have to secure building permits and water rights and establish record-keeping protocols unfamiliar to an industry that’s long operated in the shadows. “It’s going to take decades for California to regulate its cannabis industry,” says Allen. “It’s been decades that we’ve been making this mess, and it’s going to take us a while to clean it up.”

In Maine, where a legalization ballot measure passed in 2016 by less than 1 percentage point, localities retain broad power to ban marijuana cultivators and retailers, potentially hindering the growth of the state’s cannabis industry. Massachusetts has a July 2018 deadline to issue its permits. That’s already been delayed once. In July state lawmakers established the independent Cannabis Control Commission to develop regulations. Even with the extension, the commission’s chairman, Steven Hoffman, says the July deadline is “a pretty tight time frame.”

Early difficulties are common for recreational marijuana. Nevada faced product shortages when its markets opened in July 2017. Alaska’s first year brought in $1.2 million in tax revenue, short of a projected $2 million. Colorado and Washington both took in less tax revenue than expected in their first year, but revenue has grown every year since and now exceeds projections. Colorado’s effective tax rate is around 30 percent, and Washington has a flat rate of 37 percent. Joseph Bishop-Henchman of the Tax Foundation says these relatively high taxes have allowed a significant black market to persist by making legal pot expensive. States that have legalized more recently have set the rate lower. In Oregon, it’s 17 percent. Maine and Massachusetts have proposed rates of about 20 percent, while California is planning for a 15 percent levy. There isn’t enough data to measure the impact of lower taxes, but Maine state Senator Teresa Pierce believes that Maine will “hit a sweet spot” and be able to undercut black market prices.

As momentum behind legalization grows, a federal crackdown appears less likely. To avoid prosecution under federal law, state legislatures adhere to the 2013 Cole Memorandum, a document issued during Eric Holder’s tenure as U.S. attorney general essentially assuring states that the feds won’t intervene as long as they follow their own rules. But the Cole Memo isn’t legally binding, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions has a long history of opposition to marijuana. “I think the Justice Department may rearrange the deck chairs a little bit, but ultimately, they’re not going to change direction too much,” says John Hudak, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. “It seems like a not-so-popular approach to an issue that most Americans don’t see as a problem.”

Marijuana’s ambiguous legal standing limits the ability of businesses to operate normally. Major banks are still unwilling to service growers and dispensaries. Marijuana companies are also ineligible for common tax deductions. This August, New Jersey Senator Cory Booker introduced a bill that would remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act, legalize it federally, and withhold prison funding from states with racial and class disparities in their marijuana arrest rates. With Republicans in charge of Congress, the bill is largely symbolic. That leaves states that have legalized pot trying not to attract undue attention from a potentially adversarial Trump administration. “I think as long as we keep our noses clean, we’ll be good,” says Republican Washington state Senator Ann Rivers.
 
Is Obama Back on the Cannabis Train? We’re Skeptical

President Barack Obama, when in office, was no friend of cannabis. Sure, he allowed Washington and Colorado to go legal, but his Justice Department also unleashed a massive crackdown on California cannabis businesses, and he certainly slept on his chance to reschedule. When a hiker passed Obama on a trail in Hawaii and urged him to “legalize it,” the president politely ignored him.


On the other hand, Obama was also the first American president to openly acknowledge using cannabis. One biography even described the young Barry O. as a champion pot smoker—a reputation that inspired not only national news headlines but also a memorable sketch by Key and Peele.


Obama himself maintains that his cannabis use dropped off after transferring to Columbia University from Occidental College in Los Angeles—where, this reporter and Occidental alumnus has heard, he used to call roommates after his evening classes and tell them to “light up the long bong.”

According to a new book, however, he’s back at it.


RELATED STORY
Obama Punts on Cannabis Reform

The former president now “spends much of his time at his home just blocks from the White House playing video games, chatting on the phone with celebrity pals, smoking marijuana and popping cannabis-infused gummy bears,” Edward Klein, a former New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief, writes for the conservative website World Net Daily.

Video games and infused gummy bears? Color us skeptical.

Klein first made the claims in his new book, All Out War: The Plot to Destroy Trump, in which he quotes “a close Obama family friend” who said Obama “sees himself as sort of a hipster ex-president, a cool guy.”

Most of the allegations seem to turn on longtime criticisms of Obama as a self-absorbed “celebrity” president—or worse, on pervasive stereotypes of black men.
“He wants to go back in terms of fashion and style to his pot-smoking days as a member of the Choom Gang at the Punahou School in Hawaii,” Klein claims the friend told him. “He gets the weed from friends who visit him. I was told he keeps a small stash in his bedroom. He has rolling papers and hasn’t forgotten how to roll a joint. Sometimes he’ll smoke in his bedroom, and sometimes in the backyard. But mostly he does it when he’s traveling.”

We at Leafly wouldn’t be surprised to hear that Obama hit a joint between kitesurfing sessions with Richard Branson, but the thought of the bookish ex-president holed up in a cannabis den playing video games all day strikes us as more than a little farfetched. Nevertheless, we’ve reached out to the Office of Barack and Michelle Obama to see what folks there have to say.


RELATED STORY
That One Time Bruce Springsteen Sang to Obama About Marijuana

In the meantime, more unconfirmed claims made by Klein:

  • In an interview with the Todd Starnes Show, Klein reportedly said that Obama enjoys winding down by playing the video games “Styx: Shards of Darkness,” “Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon,” and “Halo War 2 Ultimate Edition.”
  • Klein claims that Valerie Jarrett, a former senior adviser to the president, said that “Barack mostly sits in his study playing video games and ordering a hip new wardrobe online, including a leather jacket and $300 Prada sunglasses.” That quote comes via Klein’s unnamed family friend. “He takes phone calls from show-business friends like Bruce Springsteen, Jay-Z and Tom Hanks, but he refuses to talk politics.”
  • “He had a blow up with Michelle when Malia was caught on video smoking what looked like a joint at a Lollapalooza concert in Chicago,” Klein claims the friend told him. “When the tape of Malia went viral, Michelle blew up at him; she said it was his fault because he set a bad example for his daughters, that it was OK to use pot.”
If any one of these claims is true, it’d be big news. Maybe it is. But most of these allegations seem to turn on longtime criticisms of Obama as a self-absorbed “celebrity” president—or worse, on pervasive stereotypes of black men as deadbeat dads and drug users.


RELATED STORY
California Is Still Arresting Too Many People of Color for Cannabis

Klein’s “exclusive” article being published on World Net Daily casts further doubt on the claims. WND is widely considered to be a far-right or alt-right outlet, and the publication spent considerable time furthering the conspiracy theory that Obama was born outside the US.

Although his early career was marked by high-profile stints as a foreign editor at Newsweek and the top editor of the NYT Mag, in recent years Klein’s work has been roundly dismissed by critics on both the left and the right for containing thinly sourced material and serious factual errors. Conservative writer John Podhoretz slammed Klein’s 2005 biography of Hillary Clinton, The Truth About Hillary, as so poorly researched and written that “thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower.” One reviewer at the right-wing National Review wrote that “nobody on the right, left, or center ought to stoop to this level.”

So take Klein’s Obama stories for what they’re worth. There may be a reason no legitimate publication is excerpting his new book.
 
Christie is a total tool and will hand NJ over to Democrats which is fine by me as I don't think this self-serving, self-righteous, ignoramus should be in any position of authority.

Florida congressman slams Gov. Chris Christie for “outrageous” medical marijuana position
"The federal government has lied to the American people for a generation about cannabis," Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz said


A freshman Republican congressman on Thursday condemned New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for “outrageous” statements he made comparing medical cannabis legalization efforts to the origins of the current opioid epidemic.

“It is shortsighted, it is inaccurate and it is indefensible to suggest that the proliferation of medical cannabis — that is saving lives and improving quality of life for people — somehow is analogous to the plague of the opioid crisis,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) said at a press conference organized by the American Legion, which is calling for legalization and research of medical marijuana for U.S. military veterans.

Christie, a Republican, is chairman of President Donald Trump’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis. In a letter announcing recommendations made by the commission Wednesday, Christie compared the recent proliferation of medical cannabis laws to the over-prescribing of opioids that led to the current epidemic.

“There is a lack of sophisticated outcome data on dose, potency, and abuse potential for marijuana,” Christie wrote towards the end of a seven-page cover letter accompanying the commission’s report. “This mirrors the lack of data in the 1990’s [sic] and early 2000’s [sic] when opioid prescribing multiplied across health care settings and led to the current epidemic of abuse, misuse and addiction. The Commission urges that the same mistake is not made with the uninformed rush to put another drug legally on the market in the midst of an overdose epidemic.”

Gaetz dismissed Christie’s logic on Thursday, asserting that to stem the ongoing crisis, the country should have the maximum number of options available — including medical cannabis — to prevent people from turning to opioids.

“The federal government has lied to the American people for a generation about cannabis in asserting that it has no medical value,” Gaetz said. “I can tell you it is not true.”

Related: Veterans overwhelmingly support medical cannabis research, legalization

The first-term congressman representing the Florida Panhandle is co-sponsor of legislation to transfer marijuana to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act from its current standing as a Schedule I substance, the strictest of the classifications.

AP_16236498277042-1-500x384.jpg

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Florida (Steve Cannon, Associated Press File)
House Bill 2020 would uphold the rights of states that have legalized the medical use of cannabis, allow for banking activities and create a clearer path for research, Gaetz told The Cannabist in April.

When Gaetz was a Florida state legislator in 2014 and 2015, he backed legislation to legalize “non-euphoric” marijuana for medical use and a bill to allow terminally ill patients to access full-strength, non-smokeable cannabis. Both were signed into law.

Christie has repeatedly stated his opposition to legalizing marijuana.

He left no doubt about his opinion of cannabis in an April 2014 radio interview:

“I don’t care that people think it’s inevitable. It’s not inevitable here. I’m not going to permit it — never — as long as I’m governor. You wanna elect somebody else who’s willing to legalize marijuana and expose our children to that gateway drug and the effects it has on their brain, you’ll have to live with yourself if you do that — but it’s not going to be this governor who does it.”

In September 2016, he issued a signing statement to a state measure allowing medical cannabis to treat PTSD to require other means of treatment before a doctor could recommend cannabis in order to prevent “misuse.”

Last June, he called a hearing in the New Jersey Senate on legislation to legalize marijuana a “dog-and-pony show.”

Next week, New Jerseyans will go to the polls to vote for Christie’s replacement. Democrat Phil Murphy, who currently holds a 15 percentage-point lead in the gubernatorial race, has said he will legalize recreational marijuana in the state.

The draft 131-page report and recommendations by the commission chaired by Christie mention marijuana several times in the context of “addictive” and “psychoactive” substances, and the section on drug testing puts marijuana in the same category as coke or meth, referring to “illicit drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, or methamphetamine.”

Read the letter to President Trump from Gov. Chris Christie, Chairman of the Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis:

Follow link embedded in the title if you want to read the letter itself.
 
This link is from Stars and Stripes....not High Times or any other MJ friendly media outlet. And vets tend to be a fairly conservative group as a whole. Just shows how out of touch (or uncaring, take your pick) Sessions, Christie, and the rest are with the will of the people. These assholes should never be allowed to say "thank you for your service" as the hypocricy of them doing so, while their current views, is enough to make one want to hurl. :puke:


Poll: Marijuana research widely supported among veterans

WASHINGTON — Most veteran households, regardless of state, age or political affiliation, support researching and legalizing medical marijuana, according to a poll commissioned by the American Legion released Thursday.

The Legion, which recently joined the fight for marijuana research, hired Five Corners Strategies to conduct an automated phone poll of veteran households from Oct. 8 to Oct. 10. It included a sample of 513 veterans and 289 family members across 39 states.

The poll, with a margin of error of 3.45 percentage points, found 92 percent of veterans support research into medical cannabis as well as 93 percent of veteran caregivers.

That’s higher than the public’s support of medical marijuana. According to a CBS News poll from April, 88 percent of Americans support medical marijuana use.

“Ninety-two percent of veterans support it. That’s a landslide,” said Louis Celli, a director at the Legion. “We owe it to them to do the research.”

One in five veterans use marijuana to alleviate symptoms of a physical or a mental medical condition, the poll found. More than 80 percent of veterans and their family caregivers want to see marijuana made a federally legal medical treatment.

Veterans included in the study live in states where medical marijuana is legal and states where it isn’t.

The American Legion's Executive Director Verna Jones, left, and the group's National Director of Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation Louis Celli, center, listen as a military veteran tells how he was helped by using marijuana.
CARLOS BONGIOANNI/STARS AND STRIPES

Support for medical marijuana transcends politics, the Legion said.

Of the households that identified as politically conservative, 88 percent supported federally legalized medical marijuana. Politically liberal households were slightly more supportive, at 90 percent.

“One of the reasons we did this is to prove to lawmakers this is a politically safe topic,” Celli said. “It’s no longer ‘refer madness.’ It’s legitimate science of the 21st century.”

Since May, the American Legion has strongly advocated for more research into medical marijuana. At its national convention in August, the organization adopted a resolution urging the VA to allow doctors to discuss and recommend medical marijuana in states where it’s legal. That’s in addition to a resolution that the group passed the previous year asking for marijuana to be removed from the list of Schedule I drugs, which include heroin, LSD, ecstasy and others designated as having no medical use.

The Legion has been supportive of research in Phoenix, Ariz., that is the first federally approved study of marijuana’s effects on veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Last week, a group of House Democrats wrote a letter to Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin urging him to initiate marijuana research at the VA. The letter marked the first instance leadership of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs has focused on marijuana research, staffers for Democrats on the committee said.

The Democrats asked Shulkin to respond by Nov. 14. Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, said they have yet to receive a response.
 
This is from WoPo so will get a lot of visibility here in the swamp (hey, I live in DC suburbs and in the summer it really is a swamp! LOL)

The Trump administration’s war on marijuana will make the opioid crisis worse

The White House commission on addiction and opioids, led by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, released its final report Wednesday, listing 56 recommendations for addressing the country’s overdose epidemic. There are many solid recommendations in the report, such as training doctors to better prescribe these painkillers and mandating that health-care providers check drug-monitoring data before prescribing opioids to patients to make sure the patients aren’t “doctor shopping.”

But one point in the report stands out: the commission’s disappointing refusal to endorse marijuana as a possible alternative pain management drug.

No doubt the commission felt the need to mention the topic of marijuana due to popular demand, having received thousands of public comments on the role that marijuana could play in pain management. And there’s good reason for the public’s interest.

Read These Comments

The best conversations on The Washington Post



[Forget Trump’s ‘public health emergency.’ Real action on the opioid crisis is coming from the FDA.]

The most thorough, up-to-date research on the effects of marijuana that we have — a review of more than 10,000 studies that was published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine this year — found that there is “strong evidence” that marijuana is effective at dealing with chronic pain in adults relative to a placebo.

But we don’t have to simply take the word of scientists. Just look at the practical effects of marijuana in states where it’s available. One study from 2014 found that states that legalized medical marijuana had, on average, 25 percent fewer deaths from opiate overdoses than other states. And a study published in the American Journal of Public Health last month concluded that legalizing marijuana in Colorado led to a “reversal” in the rising numbers of fatal overdoses.

So why did Christie’s commission refuse to acknowledge marijuana’s potential as a pain management drug? The report cites a study published this year that found that “marijuana use led to a 2½ times greater chance that the marijuana user would become an opioid user and abuser.” It also cited “a lack of sophisticated outcome data on dose, potency and abuse potential for marijuana.”

The “lack of data” argument is ironic: Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 substance, making it very difficult for scientists to thoroughly study it for potential medical use.

[The opioid epidemic simply slipped through the cracks]

But even more frustratingly, the commission fails to note key limitations in the study it cited. The study is based on two surveys, three years apart (one from 2001 to 2002 and the other from 2004 to 2005), asking people about their history of drug use. Those who reported using marijuana in the first survey — including those who reported having chronic pain that interfered with their daily life — were more likely to report nonmedical prescription opioid use in the second. That’s alarming and certainly should be noted for policymakers, but it doesn’t tell us anything about why people used marijuana.

“The results may be different if you narrow it down to medicinal use,” said Mark Olfson, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University and co-author of the study. He also noted that the culture of marijuana has substantially changed since the surveys were conducted, adding, “The results may also be different if we did it today.”

In other words, we need more research to cultivate a robust understanding of whether marijuana use can be a slippery slope to opioid addiction. In the meantime, what we do know is that most marijuana users do not end up abusing prescription opioids, and legalization experiments have suggested there is no link.

Given this real-world and clinical evidence, it’s really hard to see what we should discount marijuana as a potential tool to manage pain. Yet some in the Trump administration have done this. Regarding the possibility of using marijuana to treat chronic pain or counter opiate abuse, Attorney General Jeff Sessions once said: “Give me a break. This is the kind of argument that’s been made out there to just — almost a desperate attempt to defend the harmlessness of marijuana or even its benefits. I doubt that’s true. Maybe science will prove I’m wrong.”

Maybe it won’t even matter if science proves that he is wrong. Maybe he and the rest of the Trump administration are so bitterly opposed to marijuana that they will overlook policies that could actually save lives and ameliorate one of the worst public-health crises in the history of the United States.
 


True or false: Republicans want to legalize cannabis?



Chances are that you'd struggle to find an industry within the U.S. that's growing at a faster and more consistent pace than legal marijuana.

Colorado, one of the eight states that's legalized recreational and medical cannabis, and the first state to sell adult-use weed, saw combined sales of legal weed soar by more than 30%, to over $1.3 billion in 2016. This surge in sales is a result of organic growth in recreational weed, right along with an increase in tourism to the state.

On a broader basis, Marijuana Business Daily's latest report, entitled "Marijuana Business Factbook 2017," projects legal marijuana sales growth in the U.S. of 45% in 2018, and an aggregate of 300% between 2016 and 2021, ultimately reaching about $17 billion. With pro-legalization groups rallying around multiple states for the 2018 elections (e.g., Arizona and Michigan), the chances of pot's expansion are decent if things stay as they are.

Capitol Hill is choking the marijuana industry's potential

However, the cannabis industry has one major obstacle: the federal government. Marijuana is a schedule I drug on Capitol Hill, making it entirely illegal, just like heroin and LSD. Cannabis also has no recognized medical benefits on Capitol Hill despite a handful of studies that have appeared to suggest otherwise. For example, GW Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:GWPH), a U.K.-based drug developer that utilizes cannabinoids to effect positive biologic change, has demonstrated in multiple phase 3 studies that its cannabidiol-based oral drug Epidiolex can significantly reduce seizure frequency in patients with two rare forms of childhood-onset epilepsy, Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Along with this brick wall in Washington comes a number of inherent disadvantages for marijuana-based businesses. They have little to no access to basic banking services, such as a checking account, and they're almost always required to pay tax on their gross profit -- as opposed to their net profits -- if they're profitable. This is because U.S. tax code 280E disallows businesses that sell a federally illegal substance from taking normal corporate income tax deductions.

Yet here's the interesting aspect of this bifurcation between the states and the federal government: The people side with the states. A newly released Gallup poll finds that 64% of Americans want cannabis to be legal across the United States. A separately conducted survey from the independent Quinnipiac University, which was released in April, found even stronger support for the idea of legalizing medical cannabis. Some 94% of respondents were in favor compared to only 5% opposed.

asking-questions-retirement-puzzle-social-security-finances-getty_large.jpg


True or false: Republicans want to legalize cannabis?

What's the holdup on Capitol Hill? Finger-pointing would dictate that it's Republicans holding up marijuana's expansion. Republicans and senior citizens have historically been the two groups who've opposed the expansion of pot. However, Gallup's survey shows something different in 2017.

When the national pollster questioned folks about their opinion on legalizing marijuana and asked for their political party affiliation, 51% of Republicans favored legalization. That's the first time ever that a majority of Republicans were in favor of legalizing marijuana for recreational use. It should be noted that, at 51% support, the margin of error of this poll is still within range to push this figure below 50%, but it's nonetheless an impressive milestone.

GOP support for weed rose very slowly, from 20% in 2003 to 37% in 2015, but it's exploded higher over the past two years. Perhaps this surge in support is a result of a shift in perception from their constituents. After all, if lawmakers don't abide by the desires of their constituents, they risk being voted out of office.

One key Republican stands in the way of pot's expansion

Of course, not all Republicans support weed, or are in favor of its expansion, even if they have no moral objection to cannabis. An example is Gov. Phil Scott (R-Vt.), who earlier this year vetoed a recreational marijuana bill in Vermont that overwhelmingly passed in the state's Senate and House. Scott cited concerns about weak penalties for driving under the influence as the reason for vetoing the legislation, but left the door open for future legislation once his concerns were addressed.

federal-state-marijuana-laws-gavel-cannabis-thc-pot-weed-getty_large.jpg


But there's one key Republican who really stands in the way of Washington even considering a change in stance on weed -- and it's not President Trump. The true barrier to progress lies squarely with Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Sessions has, on numerous occasions, not minced words about his views on cannabis. Sessions is quick to remind folks that federal law still holds true in all 50 states and has implied that the Justice Department is reviewing the possibility of coming down more harshly on the marijuana industry in states that have legalized.

What's more, Sessions sent a letter to some of his congressional colleagues in May that requested they repeal the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment, which disallows the Justice Department from using federal funds to prosecute marijuana businesses that are operating in legal states. Sessions' insistence that this be repealed is a pretty clear indication that he's possibly preparing to wage war on the marijuana industry.

Even with the tide shifting among the public and within the Republican Party, it's difficult to see how any real progress will be made at the federal level with Sessions as attorney general. That'll likely cap the potential of the marijuana industry, and may put a serious crimp in the returns for marijuana stock investors.
 
Yeah....grow a half of a ton of it....but remember, it has absolutely no clinical purpose or benefit...well, according to the DEA and schedule 1. sigh

DEA Wants Feds To Grow Almost 1,000 Pounds Of Marijuana Next Year

443,680 grams.

That's how much marijuana the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) wants federally-licensed researchers to grow for use in scientific studies in 2018.

960x0.jpg

SAEED KHAN/AFP/Getty Images

That amounts to a little more than 978 pounds of government-cultivated cannabis.

While that may sound like a lot, it's actually a slight decrease from this year's level.

The 2018 aggregate production quotas that DEA laid out in a Federal Register filing slated for publication on Wednesday are amounts the agency thinks will "provide for the estimated medical, scientific, research [and] industrial needs of the United States, lawful export requirements, and the establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks."



In addition to establishing the quota of nearly 1,000 pounds of marijuana, DEA will allow the production of 384,460 grams of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) in 2018.

The order, signed by Acting DEA Administrator Robert W. Patterson, also allocates quotas of 92,120 grams of cocaine, 40 grams of LSD, 45 grams of heroin, 30 grams of psilocybin, 30 grams of ibogaine and varying levels of many other substances.

The filing comes just a few days after DEA finalized 2017 drug production quotas, establishing a limit of 472,000 grams of marijuana and 409,000 grams of THC.

In comparison, the proposed reduction for 2018 seems to run counter to DEA's stated goal of expanding marijuana research. If there are to be more studies, it would probably make sense to allow for an increased supply of cannabis.
 


Election 2017: The Cannabis Races We’re Watching Closely


Statewide Measures
New York
Voters in New York will have the chance to vote on a constitutional convention question on this year’s ballot. Voting yes would trigger a constitutional convention, which would allow changes to be proposed to the state Constitution. Voters would be then able to weigh in on those changes in a November 2019 election.

A constitutional convention could open the door for the statewide legalization of adult-use cannabis via a change to the state’s Constitution, although the likelihood of that change is less than certain, and the change wouldn’t take place for several years.


RELATED STORY
Drug Policy Alliance: Time to Decriminalize, NYC Racial Disparities Remain

If voters were to approve the convention, the process would begin in 2018 with the election of more than 200 delegates, with three representing each of the state’s 63 Senate districts and an additional 15 individuals from anywhere in the state.

Citywide Measures
Detroit, Michigan
Voters in Wayne County will decide the fate of Proposal A and Proposal B, both of which would amend current medical marijuana laws.


RELATED STORY
Detroit Voters Will Have Say in Cannabis Regulations

Proposal A would change the Detroit City Code to require a dispensary to be at least 500 feet from another dispensary and a religious institution, down from the current requirement of 1,000 feet. Proposal A would also allow dispensaries near alcohol retailers, child care centers, arcades, and parks. Under Proposal A, dispensaries would be allowed to stay open until 9 p.m., extending the current required closing time by one hour.

Proposal B, meanwhile, would allow growers and secure transporters to establish and operate within Detroit’s industrial districts (zoned M1-5) and business districts (zoned B1-5).

Athens, Ohio
The Athens Cannabis Ordinance would reduce penalties for cannabis misdemeanors to a fine of $0, effectively “depenalizing” low-level cannabis possession, cultivation, and gifting. Marijuana misdemeanors affected would include:

  • Possession of up to 200 grams of marijuana and up to 10 grams of hash
  • Cultivation of up to 200 grams of marijuana
  • Gifts of up to 20 grams of marijuana
  • Possession and sale of paraphernalia

RELATED STORY
Ohio’s Aspiring Cannabis Growers: A Closer Look

Gubernatorial Races
New Jersey Governor
New Jersey’s gubernatorial race will pick a replacement for current Republican Gov. Chris Christie, who’s lashed out against both medical and adult-use cannabis legalization—most recently in a report to the Trump administration.


RELATED STORY
If New Jersey Legalizes, Do I Have to Move Back Home?

From a cannabis perspective, the stakes couldn’t be higher: While either candidates would likely be an improvement over Christie, Democratic nominee Phil Murphy, who currently leads the race, wants to legalize cannabis for adult-use. His opponent, Republican Kim Guadagno—currently Christie’s lieutenant governor—does not. She’s said she’s “wholly opposed to legalizing marijuana”—although she’s indicated support for limited decriminalization and some expansion of the state’s medical marijuana program.

Virginia Governor
Currently holding a narrow lead in the polls is Democratic nominee Ralph Northam, the state’s lieutenant governor, who has said he supports medical marijuana and would make a push for decriminalizing the drug if he’s elected. He’s called the state’s current enforcement and sentencing laws “costly and disproportionately harmful to communities of color.”


RELATED STORY
Infographic: The Fastest-Trending Cannabis Strain in Every State in 2017

Northam’s opponent, Republican Ed Gillespie, is more sluggish about reform. He’s said he opposes decriminalization because it “sends the wrong signal” to young people, but he said he would support a three-strikes approach that would remove criminal charges for the first and second offenses. By then, he told a crowd in Richmond in September, “you really should know better.” On medical use, Gillespie is similarly half-committed: He’s said he supports “limited, tightly regulated” use of cannabis for some medical conditions
 
It is very heartening to see that the American electorate is not completely brain dead and haven't fallen for Sessions and SAM's Refer Madness prohibitionist scare tactics. American's know better from direct personal experience.

If Trump is smarter than he appears, he will take note of this and rein Sessions in and support extending the latest Rohbacher amendment that prevents DOJ from going after state level med programs. The first time Sessions goes after one of these MMJ programs will be the start of a political war that I personally think Sessions will lose.


Election 2017: Legalization Candidates and Measures Win Big

Final Update: This was a small but significant night for cannabis-tied races and measures around the country. New Jersey’s pro-legalization gubernatorial candidate, Phil Murphy, won handily, and will take over for the nation’s most notorious prohibitionist, Chris Christie. In Detroit, two medical marijuana reform ordinances passed easily, with about 60% of the vote. And in Athens, Ohio, voters overwhelmingly approved a measure to de-penalize cannabis possession, with a whopping 77% of voters approving the measure.


Final Results
10:15pm EST:
Democrat Phil Murphy, Legalization Advocate, Will Be New Jersey’s Next Governor.

This is fantastic news for the folks in NJ who’ve been battling Chris Christie over medical marijuana for thousands and thousands of years. Murphy isn’t just a medical cannabis believer. He wants to adopt adult-use and has pledged to sign the bill that legalization advocates are readying in the state legislature.

Democrat Ralph Northam Defeats Republican Ed Gillespie in Virginia
If you’re a legalization advocate, this is a slight victory. Neither candidate has embraced adult-use legalization. Northam wants to decriminalize, while Gillespie would have allowed for tightly restricted medical marijuana (maybe). Don’t look for major change on the cannabis front here.

Detroit Approves New Medical Marijuana Ordinances
With 90% of the vote in, both measures are passing with about 60% of the vote.

Athens, Ohio, Voters “De-Penalize” Cannabis in Their City
The measure to zero-out the fine for cannabis possession within the city limits passed by a whopping 77%. That’s amazing. Folks, the school levy in Athens only passed by 65%.

New York State Voters Really, Really Don’t Want a Constitutional Convention
You can stick a fork in this one. With 30% of precincts reporting, 80% of ballots cast have been “no,” and the New York Times projects the “no” votes will carry.
 
Marijuana Won Tuesday's Election

Voters in two states chose new governors on Tuesday. Both of those elections -- as well as the results of a number of local races across the country -- will have huge implications for efforts to legalize marijuana.

Here's an overview of cannabis-specific ballot measures that voters approved, along with details on how the Democratic gubernatorial wins in New Jersey and Virginia will boost marijuana reform campaigns in those states.

960x0.jpg

MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

New Jersey Governor-Elect Phil Murphy

Phil Murphy, the incoming governor, campaigned on marijuana legalization.

"The criminalization of marijuana has only served to clog our courts and cloud people’s futures, so we will legalize marijuana," he said during his primary night victory speech. "And while there are financial benefits, this is overwhelmingly about doing what is right and just.”

This summer he tweeted, "NJ's marijuana laws cost $143M/yr & come w a 3:1 racial disparity in arrests."

With Murphy replacing vocal cannabis opponent Chris Christie (R) as governor, New Jersey is poised to potentially become the first state to allow legal recreational marijuana sales with an act of its legislature, as opposed to by voters through a ballot measure.

Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D) is "committed" to bringing up a legalization bill early in 2018. "We are going to have a new governor in January 2018," he said. "As soon as the governor gets situated we are all here and we intend to move quickly on it."

Virginia Governor-Elect Ralph Northam

Ralph Northam, who just got a raise from lieutenant governor to the state's top job, made marijuana decriminalization a centerpiece of his campaign, often putting the issue in stark racial justice terms.

"We need to change sentencing laws that disproportionately hurt people of color. One of the best ways to do this is to decriminalize marijuana," he wrote in a blog post. "African Americans are 2.8 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession in Virginia. The Commonwealth spends more than $67 million on marijuana enforcement — money that could be better spent on rehabilitation."

Northam also sent a letter to the Virginia State Crime Commission, which is conducting a review of the effects of potential decriminalization. "Virginia spends $67 million on marijuana enforcement - enough to open up another 13,000 pre-K spots for children," he wrote. "African Americans are nearly 3 times as likely to get arrested for simple possession of marijuana and sentencing guidelines that include jail time can all too often begin a dangerous cycle of recidivism."

GOP Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment has already announced he will introduce legislation next year to decriminalize first-time marijuana possession offenses.

Also on Tuesday, Democrats picked up a large number of seats in the House of Delegates, which likely bodes well for Northam's efforts to pass cannabis reform bills. Still-pending results in a handful of House of Delegates races could flip the chamber to Democratic control altogether.

Northam has also spoken in favor of expanding the state's limited medical cannabis law and allowing industrial hemp.

Athens, Ohio Marijuana Ordinance

Voters in the college town overwhelmingly approved a measure to completely eliminate fines and court costs for possessing and cultivating up to 200 grams of marijuana, a move that advocates believe will significantly disincentivize police from making low-level cannabis arrests. The result was 77 percent to 23 percent.

Last year, similar depenalization measures were passed in several other Ohio cities. Together, the results increase pressure on state lawmakers to more seriously consider further reform's to overarching marijuana prohibition laws following last year's passage of medical cannabis legislation.
 
Secret Service relaxes marijuana policy in bid to swell ranks
By David Shortell, CNN
Updated 10:19 AM ET, Mon June 5, 2017



(CNN)The Secret Service is relaxing its drug policy for potential hires, as its new director, Randolph Alles, laid out a plan to swell the agency's ranks by more than 3,000 in the coming years.

Speaking Thursday to reporters in his first press briefing since his appointment, Alles, 38 days into his new job, described a force of "very dedicated" agents facing near unsustainable levels of round-the-clock protective coverage.
The change to the drug policy, which went into effect in the past month, is an acknowledgment that marijuana is more prevalent in today's society, officials said, and will allow for a younger generation of applicants, many of whom have experimented with the drug when they were teenagers, access to the hiring process.
Following a "whole-person concept" in hiring, the Secret Service will no longer disqualify an applicant who has used marijuana more than a certain number of times, instead potentially allowing a candidate who admits to using the drug, taking into consideration the time between his or her last use and their application to the agency.




It's a shift that puts the force in line with other federal law enforcement agencies, the agency said.

[FONT=Open Sans, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
Despite the change, the process to be hired to a job that could position you within feet of a head of state remains strict. A polygraph test is critical, and there is no consideration of downgrading its role in the process, as has been discussed by other enforcement groups facing staffing droughts. Credit checks and vision tests are also given high priority to recruits.
But with exceeding overtime requests for officers and an ever-present terror threat, Alles is looking to hire.
"We need more people. The mission has changed," Alles said, citing post-9/11 threats that include terror groups like al Qaeda and ISIS, as well has homegrown terrorists. "It's more dynamic and way more dangerous than it has been in years past," Alles said.

Alles himself was hired, he said, after only meeting with the President once. The interview was the only time Alles has met the President, he said. But many of his officers have certainly become acquainted with Donald Trump, his family and his many properties. Law requires 24-hour protection of members of the President's family, as well as the properties that he could be using, even if no one is inside.

"I think between that and the fact that he has a larger family, that's just more stress on the organization. We recognize that," Alles said, and said he's been allocating resources in accordance.

Trump has often spent his weekends at Mar-a-Lago, his waterfront property in Florida, as well as his golf course in New Jersey. He hasn't yet made a visit to Camp David, the military installation in Maryland that's acted as a retreat for many presidents in the past.

"Obviously, we won't be able to dictate his travel," Alles said. "We interface with his staff on how they schedule things and what works better and causes us less resource demands."

What has remained constant across administrations is the number of threats made against the President. Daily, six to eight threats come into Secret Service against Trump -- an average range that's remained steady for the past 10 years, Alles said.

Two days after comedian Kathy Griffin apologized for a gruesome photoshoot involving a bloodied mock-Trump head, Secret Service officials declined to comment on the case, but normal reviews of similar actions in the past have warranted an official interview.
 
Secret Service relaxes marijuana policy in bid to swell ranks
By David Shortell, CNN
Updated 10:19 AM ET, Mon June 5, 2017



(CNN)The Secret Service is relaxing its drug policy for potential hires, as its new director, Randolph Alles, laid out a plan to swell the agency's ranks by more than 3,000 in the coming years.

Speaking Thursday to reporters in his first press briefing since his appointment, Alles, 38 days into his new job, described a force of "very dedicated" agents facing near unsustainable levels of round-the-clock protective coverage.
The change to the drug policy, which went into effect in the past month, is an acknowledgment that marijuana is more prevalent in today's society, officials said, and will allow for a younger generation of applicants, many of whom have experimented with the drug when they were teenagers, access to the hiring process.
Following a "whole-person concept" in hiring, the Secret Service will no longer disqualify an applicant who has used marijuana more than a certain number of times, instead potentially allowing a candidate who admits to using the drug, taking into consideration the time between his or her last use and their application to the agency.




It's a shift that puts the force in line with other federal law enforcement agencies, the agency said.

[FONT=Open Sans, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
Despite the change, the process to be hired to a job that could position you within feet of a head of state remains strict. A polygraph test is critical, and there is no consideration of downgrading its role in the process, as has been discussed by other enforcement groups facing staffing droughts. Credit checks and vision tests are also given high priority to recruits.
But with exceeding overtime requests for officers and an ever-present terror threat, Alles is looking to hire.
"We need more people. The mission has changed," Alles said, citing post-9/11 threats that include terror groups like al Qaeda and ISIS, as well has homegrown terrorists. "It's more dynamic and way more dangerous than it has been in years past," Alles said.

Alles himself was hired, he said, after only meeting with the President once. The interview was the only time Alles has met the President, he said. But many of his officers have certainly become acquainted with Donald Trump, his family and his many properties. Law requires 24-hour protection of members of the President's family, as well as the properties that he could be using, even if no one is inside.

"I think between that and the fact that he has a larger family, that's just more stress on the organization. We recognize that," Alles said, and said he's been allocating resources in accordance.

Trump has often spent his weekends at Mar-a-Lago, his waterfront property in Florida, as well as his golf course in New Jersey. He hasn't yet made a visit to Camp David, the military installation in Maryland that's acted as a retreat for many presidents in the past.

"Obviously, we won't be able to dictate his travel," Alles said. "We interface with his staff on how they schedule things and what works better and causes us less resource demands."

What has remained constant across administrations is the number of threats made against the President. Daily, six to eight threats come into Secret Service against Trump -- an average range that's remained steady for the past 10 years, Alles said.

Two days after comedian Kathy Griffin apologized for a gruesome photoshoot involving a bloodied mock-Trump head, Secret Service officials declined to comment on the case, but normal reviews of similar actions in the past have warranted an official interview.


Even as far back as 1979, when I was in the USAF, a General (he was the commander of 13th Air Force at Clark which also had the 3rd Tactical Fighter Wing of which I was a member)....he told me that if they kicked out every pilot who ever used MJ, his fighter wings would be non-operational.

SS isn't doing this out of enlightenment so much as practical realities...or so I think.
 
Last edited:
"In September, Sessions, who chairs the House Rules Committee, helped block the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment..."

He didn't help block it, he blocked it all by himself by not allowing the amendment to come to the floor for debate or vote. Fuck Pete Sessions....wonder if he's any relationship...maybe its genetic with those two Sessions?


Rep. Blumenauer launches committee to target anti-pot lawmakers

Oregon's leading marijuana advocate in Congress, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, has formed a political action committee aimed at unseating anti-marijuana lawmakers. Video courtesy of Russ Belville, host of The Marijuana Agenda at MJAgenda.com. Wochit

Oregon's leading marijuana advocate in Congress, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, has formed a political action committee aimed at unseating anti-marijuana lawmakers.

The Portland Democrat's Cannabis Fund is one in a growing suite of similar committees paying to promote weed-friendly candidates and policies. Pot committees raised at least $177,840 in the 2015-16 election cycle, Federal Election Commission records show.

Some of the biggest names during the cycle included the National Cannabis Industry Association ($104,066), the Marijuana Policy Project ($47,140) and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws ($26,634.11).

The new Cannabis Fund had a meager $2,000 in contributions as of June — the last time it reported financial moves — but Blumenauer already has plans for where to direct the money.

At a Portland pot conference in October, Blumenauer said his "first target" is Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas.

Contention between the two lawmakers traces back to at least July, when Sessions helped block a vote on one of Blumenauer's amendments to ease restrictions for veterans trying to get ahold of medical marijuana through the Department of Veterans Affairs. Marijuana is still federally illegal.

In September, Sessions, who chairs the House Rules Committee, helped block the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment, which would have stopped the Justice Department from using federal funds to prosecute medical marijuana users in states where the use is legal.

The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment was also named for Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. In February, the two congressmen, along with Reps. Jared Polis, D-Colo., and Don Young, R-Ala., started the first Congressional Cannabis Caucus, marking a new era for bipartisan marijuana support on Capitol Hill.

But they still faced resistance.

Blumenauer said, "We’re going to be putting up some billboards in Pete Sessions’ district … It's going to feature a veteran and ask the question why Pete Sessions doesn’t want him to have access to his medicine."

"We’re going to make the point that there are consequences," he said later. "This is not a free vote."

Russ Belville, who produces a marijuana podcast in Portland, first reported the speech in a video posted to social media.

Blumenauer said in a statement to the Statesman Journal: "The American people overwhelming support cannabis reform, and we have more support than ever in Congress. I launched the Cannabis Fund to keep up this momentum.

"I want to see even more pro-cannabis candidates elected to Congress and continue the wave of reforms happening at the state level. And we want to make clear that there are consequences for those elected officials opposing what a majority of the public supports," he said.

Sessions told the Statesman Journal in a statement, “The merchants of addiction are attempting to influence our work and it’s my hope that we will see this problem as a national crisis."

Sessions has long been anti-legalization and will do all he can to protect families from America's drug crisis, Caroline Boothe, a spokeswoman for Sessions, said in an email.

"While he is always open to listening about new developments, especially when it comes to helping our nation’s veterans, he will not compromise the safety of our communities," Boothe said.

The billboard war is heating up in Texas as anti-pot group Smart Approaches to Marijuana Action launched its own digital board, along U.S. Route 75 close to Sessions' district office in Dallas, to support the congressman's stance.

The billboard shows Amanda, a Texas mother cradling a baby who says, "Thanks, Congressman Sessions for protecting my family against marijuana legalization."

Kevin Sabet, the group's president, said in a statement, "The marijuana industry, egged on by a politician from Portland, Oregon who is bankrolled by the pot lobby, has decided to target Congressman Sessions for championing his constituents health and safety."

"The pot lobby can't stand having someone standing up to their addiction-for-profit tactics," Sabet said. "But his constituents know better, and our billboard reflects their gratitude."
 
The link is to the Cannabist but the article was generated as a special assignment for the Washington Post....not just a stoner rag sheet, yeah?

Hey @momofthegoons - ain't this article saying what we have been talking about for a long while....self-righteous, entitled, professional politicians undermining democracy by intentionally thwarting the will of the electorate.


Op-ed: Maine’s governor wants to ignore the will of voters. He’s not alone.
State legislators across the country are resisting the will of the people by gutting or even repealing citizen initiatives

By Josh Silver, Special To The Washington Post

Less than a day after voters in Maine voted to expand Medicaid in their state, Gov. Paul LePage (R) moved quickly to subvert their democratic will, announcing Wednesday that he will not implement the expansion until it is “fully funded by the Legislature.”

This is not the first time that elected officials in the state have blatantly ignored voters in this way. Last year, Mainers approved an innovative reform known as “ranked-choice voting,” as an effort to ensure that their governor wins with a majority of the vote. But the state legislature did not agree with that decision, so it recently voted to delay and potentially repeal the initiative. In fact, it brazenly meddled with every single ballot measure passed by the state’s voters in 2016.

Related:
Maine Gov. Paul LePage vetoes marijuana bill, saying federal future of legalization uncertain
Mainers voted for a 10 percent tax on weed, but lawmakers want more

The news out of Maine is part of an ominous pattern: State legislators across the country resisting the will of the people by gutting or even repealing citizen initiatives. This is a shockingly undemocratic trend at a time when U.S. voters are already deeply unsatisfied with their elected leaders.

The citizen initiative – in which a group of voters brings a proposed law or constitutional amendment to the ballot for the public to approve or reject – exists in 26 states and the District of Columbia. It has long been a critical tool for advancing key issues that are popular with the public but unlikely to make it through legislatures or city councils.

But more and more legislators have been willing to effectively deny their constituents’ political voices. Perhaps the most egregious repeal of a voter-approved initiative in modern history took place this year in South Dakota, where voters passed a suite of ethics and campaign finance reforms aimed at eradicating political corruption endemic to the state’s politics. The state’s legislature quietly declared an “emergency session” and swiftly repealed the citizen-approved measure intended to regulate their own corrupt behavior.

Unfortunately, South Dakotans and Mainers are not alone. In Massachusetts, the legislature amended and delayed implementation of a 2016 voter-approved ballot measure to legalize marijuana sales. The Missouri legislature has repealed measures covering a range of issues, from school funding to gun safety to animal cruelty. Missouri lawmakers are also exploring new rules to make it harder to get an initiative on the ballot. Lawmakers in Michigan have the same objectives, but they employ different tactics. They have specialized in undercutting or superseding a proposed initiative before it has a chance to even pass – a process known as pre-emption.

More ballot initiative news
And a year before the October massacre in Las Vegas, Nevada voters approved a ballot initiative to require background checks for gun purchases. A month later, the state’s attorney general said the measure could not be enforced.

This pattern of legislative tampering should alarm all Americans. When our elected officials repeal voter-approved laws designed to improve the very nature of our democracy, it hurts voters from across the political spectrum.

Thankfully, there are better paths: In 1996, Arizona voters approved a measure to legalize medical marijuana by a margin of 30 points, only to have it gutted by the legislature the next year. Enraged, Arizonans went back to the ballot in 1998 to pass Proposition 105, which blocks politicians from meddling with voter-approved laws if legislative changes do not “further the purpose” of the measure. We also find hope in places such as California, where the legislature is completely prohibited from changing the text of an initiative that has been enacted by voters. Nebraska requires a legislative supermajority to change or repeal a ballot initiative.

Borrowing from these examples, we can support efforts to pass anti-tampering laws in the two dozen states that allow the initiative. We can advocate for supermajority requirements to amend or repeal any initiative, or better yet, we can forbid all tampering that fails to further the purpose of an initiative.

One such campaign, which my organization has led, has taken shape in South Dakota. Last week, grass-roots activists submitted more than 50,000 signatures to the secretary of state to place an amendment on the ballot. The proposal would finish what last year’s now-overturned initiative started by restricting lobbyist gifts to politicians, creating an independent citizen ethics commission, making political bribery a felony and – perhaps most important – preventing the state legislature from changing any initiative unless that change is first approved by the voters.

If voters across the political spectrum can stand up in the face of this legislative resistance, they’ll ensure that the true protectors of our democracy – the people themselves – have their voices heard in the fight against corruption
 
Hey @momofthegoons - ain't this article saying what we have been talking about for a long while....self-righteous, entitled, professional politicians undermining democracy by intentionally thwarting the will of the electorate.

Why yes it is. And this next quote sums it up imo:

This pattern of legislative tampering should alarm all Americans. When our elected officials repeal voter-approved laws designed to improve the very nature of our democracy, it hurts voters from across the political spectrum.

We, the sheeple..... :disgust: Between the elected officials 'tampering' and the way big money is swooping in it's really alarming.
 
Opioid commission's anti-marijuana argument stirs anger

(CNN)New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, head of the presidential commission on opioids, warned of the dangers of marijuana in a letter to President Donald Trump earlier this month about the panel's findings, saying the current push for marijuana legalization could further fuel the opioid epidemic.

"There is a lack of sophisticated outcome data on dose, potency, and abuse potential for marijuana. This mirrors the lack of data in the 1990s and early 2000s when opioid prescribing multiplied across health care settings and led to the current epidemic of abuse, misuse and addiction," Christie wrote in the letter, which was released with the commission's final report.
"The Commission urges that the same mistake is not made with the uninformed rush to put another drug legally on the market in the midst of an overdose epidemic."

Ben Carson, the former Republican presidential hopeful and now Cabinet secretary, added to the argument during the final commission meeting, speaking nostalgically of the Reagan-era "This is your brain on drugs" ad campaign and its infamous fried egg imagery.
"It frequently starts with something as seemingly innocent as marijuana," said Carson, the secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, who was among several officials to speak at the meeting.
But some experts say the commission's fixation on marijuana was bizarre and troubling, lending credence to outdated views of marijuana as a gateway drug. And these experts want to nip such thinking in the bud.
They emphasized that they support efforts to curb the nation's opioid epidemic, but not the demonization of marijuana in the process.
"I was surprised to see negative language about marijuana in the opioid report," said Dr. Chinazo Cunningham, a professor of medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. "Research that examines pain and marijuana shows that marijuana use significantly reduces pain. In addition, the majority of studies examining marijuana and opioids show that marijuana use is associated with less opioid use and less opioid-related deaths."

She took particular issue with one line in Christie's letter in which the outgoing governor said research conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse "found that marijuana use led to a 2½ times greater chance that the marijuana user would become an opioid user and abuser."
"In general, the body of research does not back up this claim," Cunningham said.
Cunningham's research found states where medical marijuana is legal had 25% fewer opioid overdose deaths than those without medical marijuana laws. She's also starting a study that she hopes will involve 250 people who are using opioids for chronic pain and are starting medical marijuana. The first-of-its-kind study will follow the patients for 1½ years to examine the effects of medical marijuana and opioid use.
"People are dying every day from opioid overdoses. We must act now," Cunningham said. "We must offer a broad range of non-opioid strategies to address pain, and we must study these strategies."
Cannabis remains a Schedule I substance, the classification by the Drug Enforcement Administration for drugs believed to have a high potential for abuse along with some potential to create severe dependence. With federal restrictions placed on marijuana, scientists have to overcome various legal and procedural hurdles to research it.

Cunningham said those federal restrictions need to be changed "so that researchers can adequately study marijuana, and then research can guide policies."
CNN's Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta, who has covered America's medical marijuana revolution in three documentaries, said "it is fair to say that the majority of people who use marijuana do not go on to use other substances."
"While marijuana often precedes 'harder' drugs in people who do, so does alcohol and even more commonly, nicotine. In that sense, nicotine is a much more common gateway drug," Gupta said. "It may not be that marijuana is a gateway drug but rather people who are vulnerable to drug use often start with more readily available substances, such as marijuana, nicotine or alcohol."
The study Christie cited was published in September in the American Journal of Psychiatry. It was based on interviews with more than 43,000 Americans from 2001 to 2002 and with more than 34,000 respondents from 2004 to 2005.
"Cannabis use appears to increase rather than decrease the risk of developing non-medical prescription opioid use and opioid use disorder," said the study, led by Dr. Mark Olfson, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University.

Within his report, Olfson noted multiple limitations of the study, including the fact that the data were collected over a decade ago and that "the social context of cannabis use may have changed during this period." Critics have said the report oversimplifies a complex issue.
Olfson told CNN last week he didn't know that Christie was going to reference the study, and he acknowledged that some of criticism is valid.
"I agree that the relationship between marijuana and opioid use is complex and that more recent data might have yielded different results in light of changing marijuana use patterns," Olfson wrote in an email. "Nevertheless, Governor Christie is correct in that adults who used marijuana were at significantly higher risk of developing opioid use disorder. At the same time, it is important to note that a great majority of marijuana users did not develop problematic opioid use."
Shanel Lindsay, a member of the newly appointed Cannabis Advisory Board in Massachusetts, where medical marijuana and adult use was recently legalized, blasted the opioid commission for its marijuana remarks. She took particular aim at Christie for citing the study, which she called "an overly gross simplification of an incredibly complex disease affecting millions of families."

"To identify cannabis as the singular starting point of any kind of addiction is dangerous, ill-informed, and ignores all the data that links alcohol and prescription drug abuse to opioid addiction," said Lindsay, the founder and president of Ardent, a biotech and medical cannabis device company. "If you ask an addict what led them down this road, I'd bet the reasons go well beyond smoking a joint."
Though the Trump administration has begun "waging a war on weed," Lindsay said, the majority of Americans support legalization of marijuana and acknowledge its health benefits. "The growing acceptance of marijuana isn't going anywhere."
Mitchell Kulick, a lawyer who specializes in cannabis legal services, said it wasn't surprising that the commission had an anti-marijuana stance. But what is most troubling, he said, is how it overlooked new research published in the American Journal of Public Health that found marijuana legalization in Colorado led to a decrease in opioid overdose deaths in the state.
The opioid commission's take on marijuana, he said, seemed more in line with Attorney General Jeff Sessions' anti-weed rhetoric than current research. Sessions has said he doesn't think there are benefits to medical marijuana and has dismissed it as a solution to the opioid epidemic.
Follow CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter
See the latest news and share your comments with CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter.

"The positive impact that legalized cannabis is having on the opioid epidemic in states that have robust legal marijuana programs should be further studied before politicians make conclusory allegations that support their preconceived notions and political agendas," Kulick said.
In its report, the opioid commission recommended nationwide drug courts to help place substance abusers into treatment rather than sending them into the prison system. It also recommended expanding the availability of medication-assisted therapies, increasing treatment capacity for those who need help and making the lifesaving opioid overdose antidote naloxone available to more first responders.
Trump last month declared the opioid crisis a national public health emergency, a move allowing for money to be redirected to fight the epidemic and for state laws to be eased. Last year alone, an estimated 64,000 Americans died of drug overdoses, most of them from opioids.
 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top