Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law The Cannabis Chronicles - Misc Cannabis News

hahahaha....but I bet his views have "evolved" which is professional politican speak for needing to say whatever is required at the time in order to pander to an electorate demographic.

Mike Bloomberg Attacks Marijuana Legalization In Controversial Resurfaced Recording

Before Mike Bloomberg launched his 2020 Democratic presidential bid, he really wasn’t shy about his disdain for marijuana legalization.


The former New York City mayor has been widely criticized this week after a recording surfaced of him defending controversial stop-and-frisk practices and racially disparate marijuana arrests during a 2015 Aspen Institute speech. But while that short clip went viral on social media, the full audio recording from the event also features Bloomberg condemning cannabis legalization efforts at length.


Asked by an audience member about his thoughts on Colorado’s decision to end marijuana prohibition, Bloomberg said, “I think it is just a terrible, terrible idea.”


Some of the remarks from the talk were previously reported by The Aspen Times, such as when Bloomberg asserted that marijuana use is associated with reduced IQ among young people—something President Trump also said in a recently revealed secret recording.


“What are we going to say in 10 years when we see all these kids whose IQs are 5 and 10 points lower than they would have been?” Bloomberg told the Aspen audience. “Kids’ brains are being formed while they are teenagers.


But much of his anti-cannabis commentary from the talk has not been reported until now.


“If you’re my age, of course you smoked a joint in the 60s—but it was very different and just because we did doesn’t make it right,” the former mayor, who has previously acknowledged his own past marijuana consumption, said. “It was not easily accessible compared to today. Today it’s much stronger and potentially much more damaging.”


Listen to Bloomberg’s anti-marijuana remarks below:





“We are making progress in reducing smoking. We are making progress in reducing obesity and diabetes. We are making progress in reducing automobile deaths and a variety of other things,” he said. But cannabis reform is going in “exactly in the other direction.”


Bloomberg also disparaged the idea that a regulated market can prevent youth from accessing cannabis, stating that “even if you have a law that says we’re not going to sell it to them, let’s get serious: if there’s more of it around, they’re going to get it.”


“I just can’t imagine why society is doing this,” he said. “I couldn’t feel more strongly about it, and my girlfriend says it’s no different than alcohol. It is different than alcohol. This is one of the stupider things that’s happening across our country.”


Erik Altieri, executive director of NORML, told Marijuana Moment that the newly revealed remarks show just how much work Bloomberg has ahead of him if he intends to reform his image as a tough-on-crime, anti-cannabis candidate.


“Bloomberg and his wealthy friends may be able to sit around and joke about how he was able to smoke a joint in the 60’s and be just fine, but that is cold comfort to the over 440,000 Americans who were put in handcuffs for marijuana possession in New York City during his tenure as mayor,” Altieri said. “He is painfully ignorant and out of touch with sound public policy and basic scientific facts.”


“If he expects voters to treat him as anything other than an awful relic of a bygone drug war era he needs to correct himself on marijuana law reform issues immediately and somehow attempt to make amends for the countless lives he had a role in ruining,” he said. “Unfortunately, given the number of other candidates vying for the presidency who are leaps and bounds ahead of him on this, that still might be too little too late for his self-funded presidential aspirations.”


Bloomberg has been sharply rebuked this week over a different clip from the same 2015 recording where he defended the use of stop-and-frisk policing that disproportionately impacted communities of color.


An “unintended consequence” of targeting policing in those communities, he said, is that “people say, ‘oh my god, you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities.’”


“Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods,” he said. “Yes, that’s true. Why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.”


Bloomberg has taken steps since launching his campaign to pivot away from his reputation as anti-reform, voicing support for decriminalizing cannabis possession and allowing states to set their own policies.


But he continues to oppose cannabis legalization, and his past comments haven’t been forgotten. A Denver-based reporter brought up the candidate’s 2019 statement that legalization is “perhaps the stupidest thing anybody has ever done” and asked whether that meant he felt Colorado voters were stupid for approving the policy change.


“Colorado has a right to do what they want to do,” he replied. “I would advise going slowly to any other state because it’s not clear, doctors aren’t sure whether or not it’s doing damage. But if a state wants to do it, and Colorado and Washington were the first two that did it, that’s up to the state.”


“But what I really object to is putting people in jail for marijuana,” he added. “That’s really dumb.”


Bloomberg and former Vice President Joe Biden are the only two Democratic candidates in the 2020 race who oppose federally legalizing cannabis.
 
So, like it took some level of professional expertise to determine this conclusion? hahahaha...too funny.


Border Patrol Union Head Admits Legalizing Marijuana Forces Cartels Out Of The Market


The head of the labor union that represents U.S. Border Patrol agents acknowledged on Friday that states that legalize marijuana are disrupting cartel activity.


While National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd was attempting to downplay the impact of legalization, he seemed to inadvertently make a case for the regulation all illicit drugs by arguing that cartels move away from smuggling cannabis and on to other substances when states legalize.


Judd made the remarks during an appearance on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal, where a caller said that “the states that have legalized marijuana have done more damage to the cartels than the [Drug Enforcement Administration] could ever think about doing.”


“As far as drugs go, all we do is we enforce the laws. We don’t determine what those laws are,” Judd, who is scheduled to meet with President Trump on Friday, replied. “If Congress determines that marijuana is going to be legal, then we’re not going to seize marijuana.”


“But what I will tell you is when he points out that certain states have legalized marijuana, all the cartels do is they just transition to another drug that creates more profit,” he said. “Even if you legalize marijuana, it doesn’t mean that drugs are going to stop. They’re just going to go and start smuggling the opioids, the fentanyl.”




One potential solution that Judd didn’t raise would be to legalize those other drugs to continue to remove the profit motive for cartels. Former presidential candidate Andrew Yang made a similar argument in December.


Federal data on Border Patrol drug seizures seems to substantiate the idea that cannabis legalization at the state level has reduced demand for the product from the illicit market. According to a 2018 report from the Cato Institute, these substantial declines are attributable to state-level cannabis reform efforts, which “has significantly undercut marijuana smuggling.”


Additionally, legalization seems to be helping to reduce federal marijuana trafficking prosecutions, with reports showing decreases of such cases year over year since states regulated markets have come online.


In his annual report last year, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts also noted reduced federal marijuana prosecutions—another indication that the market for illegally sourced marijuana is drying up as more adults consumers are able to buy the product in legal stores.
I spent more time than average in MEXICO! (Blue eye’s with Blonde hair and tan skin made me stand out in a dangerous way!)
It can be dangerous! (Fishing in CABO make’s the risk fun?) surfing is decent as well!
COLAS were the fashion in 1970 before brick weed!
Thank you for the reminder!
 
Last edited:
The Deafening Silence Of Cannabis In The Democratic Debate


Even as a majority of states have legalized medical cannabis and more than 20% of Americans live in states that have legalized adult-use cannabis, mainstream media views cannabis as a fringe policy.

In the Democratic presidential debate last night in Las Vegas, the candidates attacked each other, with each trying to diminish their rivals in an attempt to elevate themselves among voters. However, the moderators diminished themselves in failing to bring up the topic of cannabis.

Nevada legalized cannabis via a ballot initiative in 2016, and the location of the debate presented a perfect opportunity for debate moderators to engage the issue. They did not. That failure highlights a real misunderstanding among media elite about the importance of the matter.

Even as a majority of states have legalized medical cannabis and more than 20% of Americans live in states that have legalized adult-use cannabis, mainstream media views cannabis as a fringe policy that matters little to the national conversation. Yet, cannabis policy engages a variety of other issues that Democratic candidates typically chomp at the bit to discuss. Cannabis policy includes race relations, criminal justice, social justice, tax fairness, entrepreneurship, the environment, agriculture, states’ rights, among other issues.

In a state as diverse as Nevada, one would think that a decision by voters to shift away from prohibition would be worthy of at least one question. Cannabis prohibition has disproportionately impacted communities of color in significant ways. Each year, hundreds of thousands of Americans are arrested for cannabis-related crimes, and the effect of those arrests interrupt the success of entire communities. Economic and educational opportunities are dashed by convictions that hang over individuals for the remainder of their lives. Black and brown Americans face tremendous barriers not simply because of cannabis policy, but because of the manner in which that policy is enforced.

Debate moderators could have discussed the statistics around cannabis enforcement in ways that allowed Democratic candidates both to discuss the policy and to discuss the interrelated policies that form the foundation of Democratic Party beliefs. Instead, that opportunity was missed.

Part of that problem stems from the diminished role of the only moderator who lives in Nevada, Jon Ralston, who was given little chance to discuss issues involving the Silver State. Yet, cannabis legalization is not simply a Nevada issue. It is one of national significance that often gets overlooked because of the historical bias around legalization policy. It is seen as taboo or whimsical or lacking in seriousness.

Cannabis legalization is also seen as something that eludes the interest of most Americans. And that assessment is correct. A supermajority of Americans support the legalization of cannabis, but it isn’t a priority with public opinion. (This story goes into detail about how the public views the legalization process.) Despite the energy within the advocacy community and the cannabis industry, the issue remains a minor one in the eyes of much of the public. It is seen as an issue not worthy of elevation to mainstream politics, and part of that failure is reflected in (and caused by) the type of media behavior on display during Wednesday night’s debate.
The Deafening Silence Of Cannabis In The Democratic Debate

The failure of national media to discuss cannabis legalization as the diverse issue that it is leaves most Americans unwilling to connect the dots between it and other more “meaningful” policies. Yes, presidential debates are reserved for the biggest issues of the day, but how many more times do Americans need to hear the same, tired talking points about healthcare and wealth taxes?

After nearly a dozen Democratic primary debates, there has been little dynamism in the conversation, and Wednesday night’s debate added to that — despite the fiery exchanges among candidates. In a state that legalized cannabis, in a county with some of the nation’s strongest union membership, in a city that saw the worst mass murder from gun violence in American history, the debate failed to engage in any meaningful way pot, labor organization, or assault weapons.
Presidential debates should be about more than the people on stage. The location of a debate should induce moderators to question candidates about issues meaningful to voters within that state or city. Nevadans will caucus on Saturday and make a choice about who they believe will be the best candidate for president. They will expect that person to be most suited to deal with national and international issues. However, those voters will still care deeply about a prospective president’s position on local-level policies of importance.

It is true that any one of the six candidates on stage could have brought up any number of issues unprovoked, but it is incumbent on moderators to guide the conversation.
Wednesday night’s Democratic primary debate reinforced the idea that cannabis is not important enough to be discussed by those individuals seeking to hold the highest office in the country. While cannabis advocates and industry have spent decades informing voters about the issue, there is still much work to be done to change the minds of media organization.

Until national media shifts from a stance that cannabis policy is fodder for humorless puns and tongue-in-cheek movie references, the issue will remain diminished in the eyes of the average voter and candidates seeking to become President of the United States.
 
So, this is not a political comment, but rather a fashion one. I just have a negative reaction to "celebs" who have a "signature look" that they ALWAYS display. For Bono its those blue glasses, for Warren its the cardigan or jacket with sleeves rolled up. There are many other examples.

None of which strike me as sincere and all of which strike me as manipulative. Just my thoughts on "signature looks".


Here’s what’s in Elizabeth Warren’s marijuana legalization plan

After destroying the Democratic presidential candidate with the absolute worst record on marijuana—that would be Mike Bloomberg—on the debate stage last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren this week released a detailed plan to end prohibition and legalize cannabis at the federal level.
Her plan doesn’t include any eye-popping new ideas, but it does show that she and her staff are paying attention to the latest nuances involved in the issue. When it comes to legalization, the details matter.
Warren has the full plan up on her website here, but we’ll give you the TL;DR guide below.
The Warren legalization plan would:
  • Legalize via Congress. Warren would work with the MORE Act (Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act), the legislation favored by most progressive legalization advocates, and introduced by Warren’s former primary rival, Sen. Kamala Harris.
  • Use executive authority. If Congress refuses to act, Warren would use executive authority to break down the existing walls of prohibition. That includes:
    • Appointing agency heads at the DEA, FDA, and ONDCP who support legalization.
    • Within 100 days, direct those agencies to de-list marijuana via the federal rule-making process.
    • Reinstate the Cole Memo, the Obama administration’s guidance on state cannabis laws that adopts a hands-off federal policy.
    • Encourage agency heads to develop grant programs and rules to support a racial justice approach to legalization.
Expunge convictions, protect immigrants
Beyond making the plant and its products legal, Warren’s plan addresses many of the residual harms done by decades of prohibition. Those moves include:
  • Expunging marijuana convictions by:
    • Prioritizing a federal expungement process.
    • Creating incentives for states to do the same.
  • Protecting immigrants from unfair treatment due to cannabis use or employment. Currently, any non-citizen employed in the legal cannabis industry can be denied citizenship due to that fact alone. “No one should be deported or barred from citizenship for having used marijuana,” Warren writes.
Fund research and let DC smoke
The plan would also tackle a number of ancillary issues connected to legalization, including:
  • Fighting for veterans’ right to access marijuana.
  • Funding cannabis research. “Trump has blocked any new universities from obtaining approval” to grow cannabis for research purposes,” Warren’s plan states. “As president, I will eliminate” that barrier and increase federal funding for marijuana research.
  • Fighting to lift the Congressional blockade of Washington, DC. Since 2014, cannabis has been legal for adults in the District, but Republicans in Congress have used a spending bill to block the ability of local officials to enact commonsense regulations. Result: The illicit market thrives, while leaving law-abiding residents no opportunity to purchase licensed, legal, lab-tested products. “My administration will fight to lift that ban,” says Warren.
  • Supporting Native American tribal sovereignty and allow them to set their own cannabis policies.
  • Supporting the sovereignty of other nations that wish to legalize.
You can read about the past and present cannabis policies of all the 2020 presidential contenders here.
 
Frakin A...and we old people vote early and vote often. Politicians need to heed what the electorate is saying...especially we seniors or we will send them packing.


Marijuana Use Among Seniors Is Growing Fast


A new study says there’s been a 75% increase in seniors who consume marijuana.
Between 2015 and 2018, the number of seniors over the age of 65 who smoked cannabis or consumed edibles increased by 75%, making them the fastest growing group of cannabis consumers in America.


Published in the Journal of the American Medial Association, the study shows that the increase in cannabis consumption is more pronounced in women, especially in those with higher incomes and higher levels of education.

“Consider that not even 10 years ago 0.4% of adults 65 and older said they had used marijuana in the past year, and now it’s 10 times that at 4%,” lead study author Benjamin Han told the New York Times.

It’s unknown whether the seniors who were surveyed used marijuana throughout their lives or if they started using the drug now that it’s easier to access. Although researchers speculate that the drug is used for medicinal purposes, a large majority of the people surveyed were in good health.
new study confirms that seniors love to spread fake news

While these changes show that marijuana is being embraced by all sorts of people, even those who you’d think might be resistant to change, they also highlight how important it is to conduct more studies that ensure the health of this demographic.

“Without this data, we wouldn’t know what was going on in this age group. It’s the fastest growing one and it’s important to study,” said UCLA research director Ziva Cooper. “You want to know about the frequency of use, what percentage are using daily, weekly, monthly, and what are the consequences of use in this age group.”
Like many aspects regarding marijuana use, the long term effects of the drug among seniors remains unknown.
 
Is legalization bad for medical cannabis patients?

Legal cannabis isn’t new to Canada—in fact it’s been available to patients with qualifying medical conditions since 2001. There’s no doubt that when cannabis became legal to all adults in 2018, it was made possible in large part by the persistence and advocacy of patients.
“We have to remember that it was medical patients who have allowed us to have a legal framework in Canada in the first place,” says Sabrina Ramkellawan, vice president of clinical affairs at licensed producer Terrascend.
But legalization for all adults hasn’t necessarily benefited medical users. In fact, some cannabis industry experts say increased barriers to access and affordability are setting patients back.
Financial barriers
The most common barrier to medical cannabis for patients is price, says Max Monahan-Ellison, vice president of Canadians for Fair Access to Medical Marijuana (CFAMM).
“The cost is especially challenging for patients who have little access to insurance benefits for their treatment, so these expenses come completely out of pocket,” he says, adding that in his experience, patient costs can range anywhere from $50 to over $2000 per month.Cannabis is taxed twice in Canada, provincially and federally; since there is currently no tax exemption for medical patients, they are taxed at the same rate as recreational consumers. “No other medicine is taxed in this manner; treating medical cannabis in the same way as a recreational or adult product makes it much more difficult for patients,” says Ramkellawan.
Access issues
There are no pharmaceutical points of access for medical cannabis, products are only available through mail delivery. Despite existing prior to legalization, mail delivery became more of an issue after adult-use cannabis became legal says Caryma Sa’d, a Toronto lawyer specializing in cannabis and tenant law. Both Sa’d and Monahan-Ellison shared multiple accounts of patient access issues ranging from condo security refusing packages to delivery issues.
 
“Before we get all our kids – particularly kids in their late teens, boys even more than girls – where this may be damaging their brains, until we know the science, it’s just nonsensical to push ahead,”

Bloomberg is....well, let me just say that I'm not a fan.

Hey Mike....who gives a shit about teenagers wrt a program that is for 21 y.o. and up...you know, like liquor? For adults only? You got that?



Marijuana legalization pops up during messy Democratic debate
With the U.S. election season in full swing, Democratic contenders for the White House shared their views on marijuana at the debate in Charleston this week.
Seven presidential candidates from the Democratic Party shared the stage at Tuesday’s debate ahead of the South Carolina primary this Saturday.
The issue of marijuana reform was brought up by moderator Gayle King, who asked Senator Amy Klobuchar on her thoughts about Bernie Sanders’ proposal to legalize marijuana on day one of his presidency, which was met with applause from the audience.
“It is realistic to want to legalize marijuana. I want to do that, too. I also think you need to look back at people’s records,” Klobuchar began her response.
However, the Minnesota senator said she wouldn’t move to legalize marijuana on her first day in office.
“Maybe you can’t do that on day one, I think you want a process that you go through because there are too many people that have things on their records that stopped them from getting jobs,” according to Klobuchar.
She went on to emphasize the need for funding the treatment of people suffering from substance abuse.
Promises of fixing the broken system
Turning to Michael Bloomberg, who has been sharply criticized for his enforcement of the stop-and-frisk policy during his tenure as New York City’s mayor, the billionaire said he is in favor of decriminalizing small possessions of weed.
“The first thing you should do is, we should not make this a criminal thing if you have a small amount. For dealers, yes. But for the average person, no. You should expunge the records of those that got caught up in this before. Number two, we’re not gonna take it away from states that have already done it,” Bloomberg continued.
Bloomberg warned that “you should listen to the scientists and the doctors,” which he said are wary of the effects of cannabis on young people’s brains.
“Before we get all our kids – particularly kids in their late teens, boys even more than girls – where this may be damaging their brains, until we know the science, it’s just nonsensical to push ahead,” he said.
Finally, frontrunner Bernie Sanders, who scored a landslide victory in the Nevada caucus last weekend, slammed the prohibition of marijuana and the country’s criminal justice system as “racist.”
“We have a criminal justice system today that is not only broken, it is racist. We’ve got more people in jail than in any other country on earth, including China. One of the reasons for that is a horrific war on drugs,” he said.
The Vermont senator reiterated his intention of expunging the records of people arrested for marijuana possession if he becomes president.
“And I’ll tell you what else we’re going to do. We’re going to provide help to the African-American, Latino, Native American community to start businesses to sell legal marijuana rather than let a few corporations control the legalized marijuana market,” Sanders responded.
Following this weekend’s primary in South Carolina, all eyes will be on Super Tuesday scheduled for March 3, when delegates from 15 states will be up for grabs.
 
“Before we get all our kids – particularly kids in their late teens, boys even more than girls – where this may be damaging their brains, until we know the science, it’s just nonsensical to push ahead,”

Bloomberg is....well, let me just say that I'm not a fan.

Hey Mike....who gives a shit about teenagers wrt a program that is for 21 y.o. and up...you know, like liquor? For adults only? You got that?



Marijuana legalization pops up during messy Democratic debate
With the U.S. election season in full swing, Democratic contenders for the White House shared their views on marijuana at the debate in Charleston this week.
Seven presidential candidates from the Democratic Party shared the stage at Tuesday’s debate ahead of the South Carolina primary this Saturday.
The issue of marijuana reform was brought up by moderator Gayle King, who asked Senator Amy Klobuchar on her thoughts about Bernie Sanders’ proposal to legalize marijuana on day one of his presidency, which was met with applause from the audience.

However, the Minnesota senator said she wouldn’t move to legalize marijuana on her first day in office.

She went on to emphasize the need for funding the treatment of people suffering from substance abuse.
Promises of fixing the broken system
Turning to Michael Bloomberg, who has been sharply criticized for his enforcement of the stop-and-frisk policy during his tenure as New York City’s mayor, the billionaire said he is in favor of decriminalizing small possessions of weed.

Bloomberg warned that “you should listen to the scientists and the doctors,” which he said are wary of the effects of cannabis on young people’s brains.

Finally, frontrunner Bernie Sanders, who scored a landslide victory in the Nevada caucus last weekend, slammed the prohibition of marijuana and the country’s criminal justice system as “racist.”

The Vermont senator reiterated his intention of expunging the records of people arrested for marijuana possession if he becomes president.

Following this weekend’s primary in South Carolina, all eyes will be on Super Tuesday scheduled for March 3, when delegates from 15 states will be up for grabs.
I started MARIJUANA when I was 13 so maybe too early?
Now that’s why I like science?
Why is CANNABIS projected as bad ?
Why is coffee OK then ?
MIKE don’t understand pop Culture?
Maybe we should of partied in our journey together on this spot of galaxy dust we live on in a universe in space?
I know nothing really however I do have pov’s!
MARIJUANA = SPAINISH
CANNABIS = ENGLISH however NEPOLEAN called it that first, need to check the fact’s?
 
Last edited:
Multistate cannabis operator MedMen reports $96 million loss

California-based MedMen Enterprises, a once-thriving multistate marijuana retailer, released a “grim” quarterly financial report that detailed a whopping $96.4 million net loss in its fiscal 2020 second quarter.

That loss was 49.3% greater than the $64.6 million loss the company reported during the same period in 2018. Its most recent quarter ended Dec. 28, 2019.

On a brighter note, the company, which has marijuana stores in five states, reported that its second-quarter revenues of $44.1 million rose 49.8% from $29.42 million a year earlier.

Still, Craig Behnke, an equity analyst at Marijuana Business Daily’s Investor Intelligence, described both the company’s quarterly results and its outlook as “grim.”

MedMen faces “an incredibly difficult task” because it needs “massive revenue growth” at a time it plans “deep structural spending cuts,” Behnke said.

Interim CEO Ryan Lissack said in a statement that MedMen plans to “continue to cut costs” while embarking on a “path to profitability.”

MedMen’s cost-cutting including a December announcement that it was laying off 20% of its corporate-level staff.

The company’s next chapter “will be defined by financial discipline and strategic growth,” Lissack said.

Lissack took the reins of MedMen on an interim basis after co-founder Adam Bierman resigned as CEO on Feb. 1. Bierman also gave up his voting control of the company.

The company trades on the Canadian Securities Exchange as MMEN and on the U.S. over-the-counter markets as MMNFF.
 
DEA Testing Requirement for Hemp Removed by USDA

The United States Department of Argiculture says it will delay the requirement that all THC testing on hemp crops must be performed at laboratories registered with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, reports the Hemp Industry Daily. In addition, officials say it’s a “fool’s errand” to get people to stop taking over-the-counter CBD.



According to the Daily, the testing delay comes after farmers and states alike complained there wouldn’t be enough DEA labs to handle demand. The U.S. Department of Agriculture acknowledges the complaints in an update Thursday.
“We now better understand how the limited number of DEA-registered labs will hinder testing and better understand the associated costs with disposing of product that contains over 0.3% THC could make entering the hemp market too risky,” USDA wrote. “We were able to reach an agreement (with DEA) that we are going to be able to provide some relief from the laboratory certification process for this crop year,” Greg Ibach, undersecretary for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, told members at the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) meeting this week in Arlington, Virginia.
“DEA will still expect states to work with their laboratories to try to achieve certification for the 2021 crop year,” he added.
“This about-face by the USDA means that farmers can continue to use their trusted local and regional analytical testing labs to ensure compliance with USDA rules,” Josh Schneider, CEO of San Diego-based young plant producer Cultivaris Hemp, told Hemp Industry Daily. “Getting rid of this ridiculous DEA testing requirement is a step in the right direction by the USDA,” he added. “Hopefully this means that the USDA has come to their senses and will be making better and smarter rules going forward.”
Dr. Stephen Hahn, the newly appointed commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, acknowledged this week that American consumers want CBD, saying that the agency is working to move forward with regulations.
“We’re not going to be able to say you can’t use these products. It’s a fool’s errand to even approach that,” Hahn said told NASDA attendees. “We have to be open to the fact that there might be some value to these products, and certainly Americans think that’s the case. But we want to get them information to make the right decisions.”
 
If you live in one of these states, you know what to do....vote the bums out and make them work for a living and get some politicians in office who understand the basic tenets of a representative democracy.

Divided America: 34 Percent Of U.S. States Still Don't Allow Medical Marijuana

Millions of Americans now have access to medical marijuana. But millions more do not, and attempts to change that have hit a brick wall in some states. Medical marijuana is inaccessible to 34 percent of the states in the country and remains illegal on a federal level.
This fact is a fly in the face of national sentiment. Based on the most recent nationwide survey by Gallup, 66 percent of Americans favor legalizing marijuana.
2020 offers hope for some cannabis-prohibited states. A committee in the Kentucky House of Representatives recently passed historic legislation to legalize medical marijuana, Marijuana Moment first reported. The bill is getting snagged in the Senate, where some claim more research is needed before legalization. A similar bill has passed through the Senate Committee in Alabama, and it advances to the House this year.
Still, it’s an uphill climb in both states. And they are part of a large swath of the country that still hasn’t legalized marijuana for any type of use.
Millions live in states where politicians have not followed public sentiment.



Legal medical marijuana has been around since 1995 when California first made it legal for certain conditions with Proposition 215. Over the years, other states have followed the path blazed on the West Coast, including Colorado. The laws vary by state, but common conditions and illnesses that states allow for treatment by medical marijuana include glaucoma, epileptic seizures, and to treat the pain and nausea experienced by cancer patients.
But while the medical marijuana industry has been growing, 17 states have not joined the trend. Governing, a publication that tailors its content for public officials, maintains a map of states that have passed “no broad laws legalizing marijuana.” They include:
  • Idaho
  • Wyoming
  • South Dakota
  • Nebraska
  • Kansas
  • Texas
  • Iowa
  • Wisconsin
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Tennessee
  • Mississippi
  • Alabama
  • Georgia
  • Virginia
  • North Carolina
  • South Carolina
There are 50 million people alone living in Texas, Georgia, and North Carolina, all of which rank among the most populous states in the U.S. That’s a significant portion of the country where people have been denied access to medical marijuana.
Cannabis sales at dispensaries near state borders indicate how Americans feel about this division.
A way to see how Americans are dealing with this divide in the country over marijuana is easy to find when looking at how well dispensaries are performing when situated near the border of a state that doesn’t allow medical marijuana sales.
Essentially, access for Americans in cannabis-prohibited states has forced them to cross the border (and ignore the risk and its federal illegality).
In Oregon, for example, a recent state report found that Oregon dispensaries near the border with Idaho had per-person sales 420 percent higher than dispensaries in other parts of the state. The state estimates that 75 percent of the increase is attributable to people crossing the border from Idaho.
Idaho doesn’t allow the sale of any type of marijuana. Technically, people from Idaho are breaking the law by crossing the border, buying marijuana and bringing it back to their state.
But the same can be said of the people of Ohio, who apparently are crossing the border into Michigan in large numbers to buy adult-use weed before bringing it back into the Buckeye State. Medical marijuana is legal in Ohio, but not recreational marijuana.
Until both medical and adult-use marijuana are legal nationwide — something that could happen in 2021 depending on who is elected president —people in Ohio, Idaho, and the long list of other states, may likely continue to cross the borders rather than wait for lawmakers to catch up with public sentiment.
 
"The notion of limiting THC in cannabis products is one that is as old as legalization itself. It’s almost as if government officials feel they are losing control over part of people’s lives and want to do what they can to retain as much control as possible."​

There is nothing more dear to my libertarian heart than politicians and bureaucrats losing control over my life.

Nothing Good Will Come From THC Limits

The notion of limiting THC in cannabis products is one that is as old as legalization itself. It’s almost as if government officials feel they are losing control over part of people’s lives and want to do what they can to retain as much control as possible.

From attempts in Colorado to more recent efforts in Arizona and Florida (again), lawmakers are hard at work keeping medical patients and adult-use customers from the dangers of the cannabinoid most of them are seeking when they buy cannabis in the first place.
Of course, all of this is done to keep you safe. After all, this ain’t your granddaddy’s marijuana. It’s more potent than it was back in the day, therefore you can’t be trusted with figuring out how much THC you need.
“I have been very concerned about this,” said Florida State Senator Gayle Harrell. “You’re seeing increasing percentages of THC in marijuana. This is not your granddaddy’s marijuana from the ‘60s.” (See? I bet some of you didn’t believe me when I said this ain’t your granddaddy’s marijuana.)
And all of this concern is over the theory that THC is linked to mental illness, a theory that has not been proven in the least. But even if a link had been definitively proven, what makes lawmakers qualified to decide how much medicine a patient is allowed? Isn’t that a decision for patients in consultation with whatever medical professional they choose to consult? And as for adult-use customers, who cares how much THC is in their cannabis? They can buy 180 proof Everclear, but some dank weed is just too much for functioning adults to make decisions about without the help of strangers in their state capital?
Many politicians believe their own hype – that they are some sort of servant of the people while simultaneously controlling as much of the lives of their “bosses” as possible. They will always claim it is for your “safety” or for your own good, but isn’t that what adults say to children?
Cannabis is one of the safest, most medically beneficial substances known to man; the idea that some insurance adjustor who ran for state office and got some votes knows better than you about what you ingest into your own body is laughable at best and dangerous at worst.
THC limits have no use other than to give strangers more control over your life and should be opposed whenever and wherever they are attempted.
 
Chefs can now earn a culinary cannabis certificate

The ACF has launched a specialized certificate in cooking with cannabis


From pop-ups to chef-catered parties, cooking with, ahem, pot is smokin’ right now. Indeed, the National Restaurant Association’s annual “What’s Hot” survey polling ACF chefs last year listed cannabis- and CBD-infused food and drink as the No. 1 and No. 2 top trends. The topic is getting so much traction as of late that this will be a key topic covered at both ChefConnect: Seattle and ChefConnect: Nashville. The ACF team also plans to host a symposium on cooking with cannabis and CBD in late May.

“A couple years ago, we knew there was a need to learn more about the cannabis space, so we began to educate ourselves on the subject,” says Michelle Whitfield, CFC, senior manager of culinary programs for ACF.

Since then, the ACF has partnered with a panel of chefs working in the cannabis space to help develop the curriculum and exam for what is now a new certification available to ACF members and non-members alike. To earn the Specialized Certificate in Culinary Cannabis and Edibles, students must study four resource books and then take and pass a 100-question, online exam.

“We understand that this is a controversial topic and there are stigmas, but we are approaching this from an educational perspective with a focus on safety as more chefs and culinarians enter this growing space,” says Jacqui Pressinger, ACF director of strategic partnerships. “Since cannabis is not federally legal, more states are legalizing its recreational use, so we want to be the gold standard when it comes to culinary professional development in this space, as we recognize that there are more savory chefs developing multi-course menus that include cannabis and THC as well as others getting into the edible business, especially with baked goods.”

The certificate does not include cannabis culinary training; rather, it focuses on educating chefs about proper handling and dosing of THC-laced ingredients as well as non-THC ingredients, such as hemp and CBD. The certificate also covers terpenes, which is the flavor component of cannabis, and the program is heavy on math, which is required for dosing as well as for extraction and other formulations involved in cooking with cannabis.

John C. Schopp CEC, CEPC, CCE, CCA, AAC, culinary instructor at Virginia Western Community College in Roanoke, Virginia was the first student to take the exam and pass (there are now three total certified). “I am proud and excited that the ACF has recognized the importance of providing education and a pathway to certify culinarians of all levels in the safe handling and ethical responsibility related to culinary cannabis and infused edibles,” says Schopp, who also serves as Chair of the ACF Certification Commission. “[The content] is challenging and comprehensive and I look forward to continued educational opportunities and advanced training around this topic. The ACF continues to deliver relevant and diverse education through multiple platforms, at a very high level. Certification through the ACF continues to provide employers a confident benchmark for differentiating potential new hires.”

To learn more and sign up for the course, visit the ACF Online Learning Center. Stay tuned for more ACF education and events centered on cannabis cooking.
 
Canopy Growth is closing down greenhouses and laying off hundreds

The world's largest cannabis company by market cap is getting smaller in size by shuttering 3 million square feet of greenhouses.
Canopy Growth on Wednesday afternoon announced plans to close two cultivation facilities in British Columbia, resulting in the layoffs of 500 employees. The company also scrapped plans to open a greenhouse in Ontario.
"Nearly 17 months after the creation of the legal adult-use market, the Canadian recreational market has developed slower than anticipated, creating working capital and profitability challenges across the industry," the company said in the statement. "Additionally, federal regulations permitting outdoor cultivation were introduced after the Company made significant investments in greenhouse production."
Canopy Growth (CGC) has an outdoor cultivation site that is more cost-effective, the company said.
North America's largest cannabis companies have struggled as their operational growth far exceeded the actual development of the cannabis industries. Companies, like Canopy Growth, have since taken drastic actions to scale back to ensure near- and long-term profitability.
The site closures in Aldergrove and Delta, British Columbia -- which account for more than half of Canopy Growth's cultivation operations in Canada -- are expected to result in a C$700 million to $800 million pre-tax charge on Canopy Growth's earnings in the quarter that will end March 31. The company said it'll likely incur other charges resulting from its organizational and strategic review.
Shares of Canopy fell nearly 2% in after-hours trading.
W. Andrew Carter, a Stifel analyst who covers Canopy Growth, said he was not surprised by the announcement.
"We believe the company carefully considered its cultivation footprint for both current and future needs," Carter said in a note to investors. "But with 15 million square feet of licensed cultivation [in Canada] alongside the option for outdoor growing, there is limited value for indoor production particularly greenhouse cultivation."
 
"Mnuchin declined to take a policy position but said that cash-only businesses create a concern for the IRS."​
Yeah, well the solution for that is indeed a policy legislative change to provide banking for state legal MJ companies. Not that frakin hard to grasp, yeah?


Mnuchin details IRS challenges with cash-only marijuana businesses

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Wednesday that the cash-only nature of marijuana businesses poses challenges for the IRS.

"This creates significant problems for the IRS," Mnuchin said at a hearing held by a House Appropriations subcommittee.

Many states have legalized medical or recreational marijuana. However, banks have been hesitant to serve marijuana businesses even in states that have legalized use of the drug because they want to avoid violating federal anti-money laundering and illicit finance laws. That has led to cash-only marijuana businesses.

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle asked Mnuchin at the hearing about marijuana banking issues.

"I'm hearing from financial institutions large and small alike that they still face uncertainty over whether they can provide financial services to legally operating marijuana businesses," said Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.).

Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio) asked Mnuchin if the Treasury Department would keep the Appropriations Committee informed about the challenges it faces on the cannabis banking issue.

"I think it's important Congress continue to iron out these problems as they are an issue of public safety, transparency and accountability," Joyce said.

Mnuchin declined to take a policy position but said that cash-only businesses create a concern for the IRS.

"We have to build cash rooms to take in large amounts of cash where people owe us taxes, because we want to collect the taxes, and those entities are not banked," Mnuchin said. "And I would say that creates risk to our IRS employees and to the people in the community."

Mnuchin also said that when it comes to bank regulators, Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has issued some guidance but that Treasury has "limited abilities within this guidance to direct this issue."

In September, the House passed a bipartisan bill aimed at giving banks legal cover to serve the cannabis industry, but Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) has raised concerns about the measure.

Without taking a stance on how he thinks the federal-state conflict concerning marijuana should be resolved, Mnuchin urged Congress "to deal with this one way or another."

Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) — who along with Crist and Joyce voted for the House bill in September — said he thinks it's an "incredible irony" that because of the conflict between state and federal laws, "the biggest money launderer of marijuana money, if your state's legalized it, quite frankly are the tax collectors."
 
This is very interesting as I see in my med legal state of MD that industry is pushing very hard with offers and deals on all kinds of extracted products and as a result, IMO, the variety and availability of flower has decreased.

I see a lot of sales for like "The Feel Good Collection" of topicals and the like...probably cause nobody wants it.

Smoking Marijuana Remains Most Popular Consumption Method By Far, Finds Survey

Among those who use marijuana on a regular basis, smoking remains their top consumption method of choice. This is according to a new study conducted by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence: It was also published by the National Institute of Health.
For the study researchers examined data from over 6,100 adults in twelve states, all who use marijuana. Of these, 91% say that they regularly smoke marijuana: 59% state that smoking “was their only mode of marijuana use.”

The study found that just 25% have ever used a marijuana edible, and only 20% have ever vaporized marijuana. This may come as quite a surprise to some, given this means that three fourths of marijuana consumers have literally never had an edible, and four fifths have never used a vaporizer.

According to researchers 5% reported using marijuana edibles exclusively (as in they don’t also smoke, vape, etc.), and 2% vape exclusively.
The study is titled Modes or marijuana use: Smoking, vaping, eating, and dabbing – Results from the 2016 BRFSS in 12 states.
The study’s full abstract can be found below:

BACKGROUND:
The prevalence of modes of marijuana use (e.g., smoked, vaped, eaten, dabbed, etc.), and of multi-modal use has not been assessed across multiple states, and can inform marijuana prevention and education work, given that certain modes of use are associated with specific public health risks. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different modalities of reported marijuana use among adults in 12 states.

METHODS:
Data came from 6174 adult marijuana users age 18 and older who responded to questions about past month and mode of marijuana use on the 2016 BRFSS surveys in 12 states with varied state marijuana policies. We used weighted frequencies for descriptive analyses, and logistic regression to identify correlates of multi-modal use.

RESULTS:
The prevalence of past month (current) marijuana use among adults in these states was 9.1 % (males = 12.0 %, females= 6.3 %). Among current marijuana users, 33.7 % reported multiple methods of marijuana use, 90.1 % reported any marijuana smoking (e.g., joints, blunts, bongs, bowls), 58.3 % reported only smoking (no other modes of consumption), 24.5 % reported any edible use, 4.5 % reported using only edibles, 19.4 % reported any marijuana vaping, 2.1 % reported only vaping, 14.5 % reported any dabbing (flash vaporization/inhalation of highly concentrated marijuana), and 0.4 % reported only dabbing. Correlates of multimodal use are also examined.

CONCLUSION:
Multi-modal use of marijuana is common, and use of non-smoked marijuana (edibles, vaping, dabbing) often occurs in conjunction with other modes of marijuana use. Ongoing surveillance of marijuana modes of use and multi-modal use is warranted to inform public education and prevention.
 
Just to keep a perspective on this, the CDC today released data that indicates that 20K people, in the USA alone, have died of regular influenza.

Kind of puts a different view on the hysteria over COVID-19, IMO.


Coronavirus drives cannabis sales bump, then slump

The rapid global spread of the novel coronavirus COVID-19 affects every industry on the planet, legal cannabis included.
Early reports indicate dispensaries and adult-use cannabis stores on the West Coast are seeing a mix of sales bumps, or sales slumps, depending on the level of local infection.
Seattle bump, then slump
The CDC recommends everyone have at least one month’s supply of medication on hand—in the likely event supplies are strained, or local stay-at-home orders of 14 or 28 days are issued.
For many folks, cannabis is their medication.
Early this week, one customer reported Have a Heart Belltown experienced a run on cannabis products that led to at least a temporary drop in supplies.
Seattle has seen a number of coronavirus buying sprees in the past week, most notably at local Costcos, where February sales were up 12%. Toilet paper and other essentials are now in short supply.
One prepared Seattle shopper said: “I definitely purchased up to my limit in all three major product categories (edibles, flower, concentrate), whereas normally I only hit my concentrate limit (by way of infused prerolls). And this choice was solely informed by me wanting to avoid extra trips out of the house.”
Another Seattle shopper said: “I stocked up this week more than usual to the legal limit at multiple dispensaries but the dispensaries (Zips and The Reef) were actually all pretty empty with no lines.”
On Wednesday afternoon King County, which contains Seattle, asked all businesses to switch to work-from-home, amid nine COVID-19 deaths and uncontained community transmission. By week’s end, the number of people riding mass transit traffic to work might have fallen by half. Downtown business broadly suffered.
Friday, weed customers reported that stores seemed much quieter.
“No pain or urgency or anything. Fully stocked. If anything it was less busy,” said one Seattle shopper after a Thursday run.
Hashtag Fremont staff reported a significant slowdown by week’s end.
COVID deals and sales
Anecdotally, Seattle cannabis retailers appear to be battling the foot traffic slump by texting deals and sales to store followers.
One store offered 10% off online pre-orders in an email to customers that read: “Working from home for a while? Shhh nobody has to know ;)”
Meanwhile in San Francisco, where the depth of COVID’s spread is just beginning to emerge, retail sales remained strong last week into this one, said Kevin Reed at The Green Cross.
“It was a busy weekend for sure,” he said. “There were a couple of budtenders that told me a couple customers mentioned [prepping] to them. They were stocking up, but with California law, they can only stock up so much.”
The legal carrying limit in California is one ounce of cannabis flower.
Over at Barbary Coast in downtown San Francisco Friday, a budtender there said foot traffic has been strong, with a small, but significant percentage of customers buying $400 worth of flower, dabs, or vape pens to stock up.
Legal cannabis is a $10.73 billion US industry that powers 243,700 jobs. Store operators have started planning for what the CDC calls “severe” disruption to everyday life.
“What is happening now in the United States may be the beginning of what is happening abroad,” said Dr. Nancy Messonnier, at the CDC on Tuesday.
In just 90 days, COVID has exploded past 100,000 worldwide cases and 4,000 deaths in more than 70 countries. The extremely contagious virus has swamped regional and national healthcare systems.
As that happens, the CDC recommends aggressive “non-pharmaceutical interventions” like social distancing to break the chain of transmission. That means closing schools, canceling events, and asking people to stay home, and out of public places like stores.
California dispensary operator Debby Goldsberry at Magnolia, Oakland has an 18-page coronavirus plan that includes a flash sale to blow out stock and get cash in the door, rather than have product sit in a closed store for a month.
“Traffic is normal right now. We’ll do a flash sale if it looks like things are going to close,” she told Leafly on Friday.
The Bay Area has confirmed COVID-19 cases in Alameda, Solano, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties. Depending on the rigorousness of the state’s response, some West Coast cities could be weeks away from Italy-style quarantines.
“I think people will stock up when they see it coming,” said operator Goldsberry.
 
Well, that's government who takes as much time to publish a paper as the Egyptians did to build the damn Pyramids.


FDA still “evaluating” CBD policy, agency tells Congress in new report

In a new report sent to Congress this week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that it is still working out its policy regarding the use of CBD in dietary supplements.


CBD or cannabidiol was legalized in the U.S. via the 2018 Farm Bill. However, due to a lack of research on the non-psychoactive compound found in cannabis plants, the agency has been unwilling to greenlight products containing it.


Still, pressure has been mounting on the agency to issue guidance on the use of CBD as a dietary supplement.


In January, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson filed a bill to address the gridlock facing CBD manufacturers and consumers waiting for the FDA’s approval to safely enjoy products containing the ingredient.

The bipartisan bill would have allowed the FDA to “regulate CBD that comes from hemp as a dietary supplement, providing a pathway forward for hemp-derived products,” while the compound would still remain illegal in conventional food products.


Now, after missing last month’s deadline for submitting a report on its progress regarding CBD, the agency said that it is still evaluating its policy as it continues to gather information.


“FDA is currently evaluating issuance of a risk-based enforcement policy that would provide greater transparency and clarity regarding factors FDA intends to take into account in prioritizing enforcement decisions,” the FDA wrote to lawmakers.

“Any enforcement policy would need to balance the goals of protecting the public and providing more clarity to industry and the public regarding FDA’s enforcement priorities while FDA takes potential steps to establish a clear regulatory pathway,” says in the letter.

The FDA previously warned companies about making unsubstantiated claims regarding their CBD products in December. FDA officials have also acknowledged their inability to acquire sufficient research as CBD was still illegal up until 14 months ago.


The regulator underlined this fact in its new report once again, writing that “limited systematic data exist to inform our approach.”


“As more data on CBD become available, we will be able to refine – and, perhaps in some cases, revise – our thinking and approaches.”

But as the FDA still works on tackling this complex issue, the agency did certify one over-the-counter topical drug containing CBD in January.


Elixicure’s CBD-based pain drug is the first to have been certified by the FDA, and remains the only for the time being.
 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top