Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
  • Welcome to VaporAsylum! Please take a moment to read our RULES and introduce yourself here.
  • Need help navigating the forum? Find out how to use our features here.
  • Did you know we have lots of smilies for you to use?

Law New York

NY Cannabis Insider Editor/Publisher Brad Racino and reporter Taylor Huang reported that Union Square Travel Agency, one of NYC’s first legal dispensaries – owned by The Doe Fund – has changed course in how it represents its products to consumers. The decision came after Brad’s investigation that found some of the top-selling and highest-potency legal weed currently for sale on New York shelves contains drastically lower THC than advertised on the labels.


Since Brad’s investigation, Union Square Travel Agency added a disclaimer to its products that says “THC potency claim is made by the cultivator” and Union Square “in no way attests to the accuracy of the claim.”


The levels of accuracy needs to be corrected by whoever oversees this. The cannabis commission or whatever they call it in NY. Should the public not pay attention to the accuracy of the info printed on their product?
CK
 
In my never humble opinion, there is absolutely nothing that government can't totally fuck up beyond all recognition.


Lack of dispensaries opened in NY leaves cannabis processors, growers unable to sell


ALBANY, N.Y. (WRGB) — Frustration is growing in New York’s cannabis industry over the lack of retail shops that are currently opened.

Licensed cultivators and processors in New York fear all their products and hard work could spoil by the time they’re able to sell.

Currently, New York State has licensed 295 growers and 40 processors.

Cannabis processor Nicolas Guarino tells CBS6’s Briana Supardi that his business, Naturae Oil, invested millions in adult-use marijuana production last year after the state projected that there would be 150 stores opened by this June.

“We had projected roughly 30 stores, thinking we were being very, very conservative, and here we are, June next week, and we’re going to have maybe 12 stores, so less than 10 percent of what was expected,” said Guarino.

Right now, there are only 12 licensed dispensaries opened in the state, a far cry from the 150 the state projected.

This means his business, along with the dozens of other cannabis processors, and hundreds of growers all have products to sell, but barely any buyers.

“Everybody has put in a ton of investment for this coming season,” said Guarino. “There’s going to be a ton of cultivators out there that aren’t going to be able to go into the ground or become insolvent because the market is just not at the size that we were promised it was going to be.”
According to Guarino, time is also against them because cannabis has an expiration date. While manufactured products like gummies and vapes have a two-year shelf life, smokeable flower is only good for a year.

“The farmers, right now, really have the biggest shelf life pressure as we already go into a new growing season,” said Guarino.

CBS6’s BRIANA SUPARDI: “How has this slow roll out of opening dispensaries in the state, how has it impacted operations for your business?”

NICOLAS GUARINO: “We just haven’t been able to commercialize as much oil as we were planning to, we’ve been hard pressed on economically to make all payments that were required to our farmers and our contracted farms."

So less stuff, less hiring, less jobs created so far and less sales.”

During a meeting on Thursday, John Kagia, Director of Policy at the state Office of Cannabis Management, proposed an idea to help increase sale opportunities.

“It’s a farmer’s market model through which growers would have the ability to get together and organize farmer’s markets in partnership with the retailer,” Kagia said.
“If you have a farm, a location that you want to set up an event, we’ll support that, but also if you want to piggyback on an event that already exists, a concert, a festival, some other sort of agricultural event,” he continued.

However, he mentioned that there are still several issues with the idea that need to be worked out, so it’s unclear if and when it’ll be approved.
 

New York Senate Passes Bill To Let Marijuana Businesses In New York City Take Local Tax Deductions Prohibited Under Federal Law


The New York Senate has approved a bill that would provide tax relief to New York City marijuana businesses that are currently blocked from making federal deductions under an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) code known as 280E.

While Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a budget bill last year that included provisions allow state-level cannabis business tax deductions—a partial remedy to the ongoing federal issue—New York City has its own tax laws that weren’t affected by that change.

Now the Senate has passed legislation from Sen. Luis R. Sepúlveda (D) to fill that policy gap, voting 43-18 on Monday to send the local reform fix to the Assembly for consideration.

“This bill would allow a deduction for business expenses, incurred by taxpayers authorized by the Cannabis Law to engage in the sale, distribution, or production of adult-use cannabis products or medical cannabis, for purposes of the unincorporated business tax (UBT), the general corporation tax (GCT), and the corporate tax of 2015, commonly referred to as the business corporation tax (BCT),” a summary says.

A section of the city’s tax code would be amended to add sections allowing the deductions “in an amount equal to any federal deduction disallowed by section 280E of the internal revenue code.”

“This modification to income is appropriate because, while the expenses of cannabis-related business cannot be deducted for federal purposes, New York law permits and encourages these businesses akin to any other legitimate business occurring in the State,” a memo attached to the bill says. “The City’s business taxes should similarly encourage these business activities.”

It also notes that the reform legislation has the support of New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D).

Lawmakers in several states have pursued the tax workaround as congressional marijuana reform legislation continues to stall, leaving state-licensed cannabis businesses with significantly higher federal effective tax rates under prohibition.

For example, the Illinois legislature recently approved a budget bill that includes similar provisions to allow licensed marijuana businesses to take state tax deductions that they’re currently prohibited from utilizing at the federal level. That measure has been sent to the governor’s desk.

In April, the governor of New Jersey signed legislation to allow licensed marijuana businesses to deduct certain expenses on their state tax returns as a partial IRS 280E workaround.

Lawmakers in Iowa, New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia have similarly pursued tax relief for each of their state’s marijuana markets.

At the congressional level, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) reintroduced a bill in April that would amend the IRS code to allow state-legal marijuana businesses to finally take federal tax deductions that are available to companies in other industries.

The congressman told Marijuana Moment that he believes the reform would ultimately generate additional tax dollars, as the existing code acts as a disincentive for marijuana businesses to report taxes honestly.

Also, a newly formed cannabis coalition that launched on Tuesday is advocating for marijuana rescheduling or descheduling. If cannabis is placed in Schedule III, IV or V, that would place the industry outside of the parameters of the 280E ban, the group pointed out.

For the time being, the marijuana industry continues to face tax policy challenges under the umbrella of prohibition. And as the Congressional Research Service (CRS) noted in a 2021 report, IRS “has offered little tax guidance about the application of Section 280E.”

Back in New York, state regulators are moving to allow cultivators to sell cannabis to consumers at farmers market-style events.
 
This is truly the epitome of government fucking things up...well, IMO of course! haha



New York Cannabis is a legal market in limbo, sustained by community events


Elected officials simply don’t know how to get it right the first time. And they don’t engage the people who do have that knowledge to advise them. They may have respect for legacy operators and activists but they don’t have trust with them. This is a big problem for everyone.


“New York’s ambitious regulated cannabis market is filled with uncertainty,” said Jacobi Holland, co-founder of On The Revel. “The program is under a lot of pressure to start getting more wins on the board quickly. These CAURD [justice-impacted] licensees are effectively in a joint venture with the state—trusting that they’ll receive wise cannabis business advice, adequate funding, and necessary resources through the whole process. Unfortunately, they may be falling short on all three. And the losers in this case become the licensees on both sides of the supply chain.”

On The Revel is a New York City-based company that organizes a collection of curated educational networking events, like their popular Revelry Buyers’ Club and Cannabis Summit + Block Party. They’ve been instrumental in bringing the cannabis community together to create space for entrepreneurs to network, to learn how to get products in the hands of consumers, and to navigate legalization in New York. According to Holland, the problems are not a lack of good weed in the supply chain.

“At our Buyers’ Club in February, we had 60 cultivators in the room and it’s clear that despite all the challenges there are some great products coming out of New York,” he said. “There are some fire products right now and they will only get better.”

By signing up, you accept and agree to our Terms of Service (including the class action waiver and arbitration provisions), and Privacy Statement.

Since 2016, On The Revel has produced 16 events focused on supporting New York cannabis, and their community is growing every year. Participants have much to say about the quality of these events. “The Buyers’ Club curates the best selection of cultivators throughout the state in one room, making it easier for licensed retailers to build meaningful partnerships and curate the perfect product selections,” said Kheperah Kearse, Co-Founder of Kush & Keme. “My experience at the first event provided a unique opportunity to preview brands in a way that I would not have gained simply by looking through a directory, and to discover new products I might not have considered otherwise. With all of the challenges new CAURD licensees face, Revelry Buyers' Club is a critical event for this industry, making it easier for all of us to do business.”

With a lack of legal retail shops opened in the state, On The Revel continues to fill in the gaps with another successful Buyers’ Club just last week, and a massive block party slated for August 26th, 2023, at Restoration Plaza in Brooklyn. The retail outlets in New York are the most difficult to stand up. The state has overpromised and under-delivered. There’s a lack of viable locations and funding from DASNY (the entity chosen by the state to provide these resources), more than a few broken promises, and predatory deals.

Holland has strong feelings about all of this. “Before any CAURD licensees take any deals or personally guarantee anything, I strongly advise they consult with someone with a lot of cannabis retail experience,” said Holland. “The last thing this industry needs is for an entrepreneur who has been sold the dream for generational wealth to end up with crippling generational debt.”

It takes roughly $1-2 million to open a cannabis dispensary just about anywhere, and New York is an expensive place. Real estate acquisition and buildout costs are high. New York regulatory requirements for everything from ownership to securing the facility are burdensome and hard to comply with, which raises costs for lawyers and other compliance professionals. The new rules that dropped in June are over 300 pages long, written in bureaucratic language that’s difficult for most laypeople to understand.

And the costs keep coming for retail operators once they do manage to open for business. Product inventory is a never ending, toll retailers will have to shoulder in order to compete with underground supply chains. The selection has to be large and high quality enough to bring people off the streets and into the store.

Retailers will also need money to operate for at least a year so that the business can find its legs and grow enough to sustain operations. When considering all these expenses, one can understand why this is so hard to get done. The cost is enormous and the capital markets for cannabis have dried up—DASNY tried to raise money from investors at the exact wrong time. Market conditions are bad in the entire industry right now and investors are fleeing, not writing checks. This makes for an untenable situation in New York.

The hope of many is that a decent amount of the legal cannabis businesses in the state will be “thriving with staying power.” But Holland warned me that this would be a best-case scenario. “I worry most about the inclusion of the justice-involved entrepreneurs,” he said. “Worst case—a majority of the CAURD licensees don’t get operational or are treading water.”

The off-the-charts optimism that was felt two years ago when adult-use legalization was announced has changed into something more nuanced with a mix of exuberance, frustration, and worry. Building a business from the ground up is hard in the best of circumstances. While hope is not a good business strategy for anyone, with a bit more sage advice from experienced cannabis operators, it’s a good way for a community to bond together and try to figure things out.
 
While I applaud the tribal nations being able to buy MJ and open dispensaries, this is just a small band-aid on NY's MJ issues and won't solve the underlying problem that is going to bankrupt a lot of people.


NY Cannabis Crisis: State lawmakers and tribal nations urge governor to sign rescue act

ALBANY - Hundreds of thousands of pounds of cannabis unable to be sold with many blaming the state for its slow rollout of legal recreational sales.

Now, state lawmakers and native Americans are calling on Governor Kathy Hochul to act fast and sign legislation to address the oversupply.

Dubbed the Cannabis Crop Rescue Act, would allow licensed marijuana farmers to sell their crops to the state’s tribal nations. The legislation passed in the state Assembly and Senate, but still needs the governor’s signature.

It’s a proposed solution for cultivators struggling to get their products sold as the state struggles to open more dispensaries.

“There’s a huge opportunity for cannabis and it’s concerning from where we all sit right now in the middle of the field, stockpiled with cannabis ready to sell,” said Tessa Williams, licensed cultivator and founder of Empire Farm 1830 in Columbia County.

Nearly 300 marijuana farmers are trying to sell their crops, but only 15 dispensaries are currently opened statewide.

Fears are growing that crops will go bad before they’re able to hit the shelves– meaning a lot of farmers are at risk of losing millions of dollars.

By opening the market up to tribal nations, lawmakers hope it’ll ease this situation, and tribal nations believe it’s a win-win.

“It gives us a source of local, safe, laboratory-tested products. It’s also a win for local farmers who have been experiencing a situation where they have no market to sell their crop which leads to devaluation, and all kinds of financial stress in planting next year’s crop,” said Tela Troge, member of the Shinnecock Nation Cannabis Regulatory Division.

Troge tells CBS6 that they’re ready to make millions of dollars in cannabis purchases from cultivators, if this bill is signed into law.

“We have put forward that we would like to make at least a $10 million initial purchase to open our dispensary, Little Beach Harvest,” said Troge.

Williams tells CBS6 that this could be an opportunity to increase sales for her and other marijuana growers, but she has some concerns.

“I’m concerned about what the pricing is and that we’re also still responsible for the tax,” said Williams.

“The idea was to limit the number of farmers able to grow and then open up these dispensaries so you have an aligned, vertical integration to support this social equity opportunity to support those injured in the past and generate revenue in this business inside our state for our farmers to the markets,” added Williams.

The Governor’s Office tells CBS6 that they are reviewing the legislation.

NY lawmakers and tribal nations are calling on Governor Kathy Hochul to act fast and sign legislation to address the oversupply. (WRGB)

Last week, Governor Kathy Hochul acknowledged New York's adult-use cannabis industry’s slow rollout in a press conference.

“Sometimes it takes a while to get it right, and the process has not been easy. It's not been easy. It's not at the pace we would want to see. But sometimes the things worth doing are not on an easy path,” she said.
 

Cannabis Association of New York bristles against state regulation, uneven playing field


In advance of Wednesday’s meeting of the Cannabis Control Board, a member of CANY, the Cannabis Association of New York, told Capital Tonight that decisions by the state are hurting the very people the new recreational marijuana law is supposed to help.


CANY is an industry association that represents the whole cannabis supply chain and the businesses that service the industry.


Brittany Carbone, a cannabis farmer and CANY board member, said that the initial challenges facing growers and retailers have been exacerbated by slow retail openings.


“At first, the Dormitory Authority (DASNY) was the big problem with the CAURD thing, but then the blame really has to be put on the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) because it was obvious that they weren’t going to meet the timeline goals,” Carbone said. “So, by continuing to say ‘there will be stores,' they created a false expectation.”

CAURD, or Conditional Adult-Use Retail Dispensary licensees, are permitted to open brick-and-mortar retail space from which to sell recreational marijuana grown by farmers like Carbone. DASNY was charged with both running the CAURD program and providing low interest loans to those who met the state’s criteria.


But promised seed money from a venture capital fund to assist weed entrepreneurs has been slow to trickle out. (On June 30, the Hochul administration announced that Chicago Atlantic is investing $150 million in capital in the New York State Cannabis Social Equity Fund). Consequently, very few retail spaces have opened across the state, leaving farmers like Carbone with too much stock of flower with a limited shelf-life.



Carbone claims that OCM should have operated with greater transparency and more realistic timelines.


OCM was unable to provide a comment to Capital Tonight; a late day emailed request for comment to DASNY was not returned by the time this post was published.


There is also anger over what Carbone considers to be the state’s more favorable regulations toward medical marijuana companies that are looking to enter the state’s recreational market.



For example, conditional cultivators, including Carbone, are limited in how much space they may utilize. They may cultivate one acre of flowering canopy outdoors, or 25,000 square feet, in a greenhouse using up to 20 artificial lights. They may also split their crop between outdoor and greenhouse, with a maximum total canopy of 30,000 square feet if the greenhouse flowering canopy remains under 20,000 square feet.


Here are the canopy classifications:


  • Tier 5. Greater than 50,000 square feet and up to but not exceeding 100,000 square feet.
  • Tier 4. Greater than 25,000 square feet and up to but not exceeding 50,000 square feet;
  • Tier 3. Greater than 12,500 square feet and up to but not exceeding 25,000 square feet;
  • Tier 2. Greater than 5,000 square feet and up to but not exceeding 12,500 square feet; or
  • Tier 1. Up to, but not exceeding 5,000 square feet
Medical marijuana companies, which are well-financed, are authorized to operate up to 100,000 square feet of canopy space, and proposed regulations don’t mention a limit on the number of lights they may use.


“They (New York State) put justice-involved individuals at the forefront, and talked a lot about social and economic equity, which is distressed farmers. But then, by not really fulfilling their promises and the expectations that they laid out, it put the more vulnerable population in a really bad situation and actually made them worse off,” Carbone said.



According to the latest draft regulations, medical marijuana operators (also known as RODs or Registered Organization Dispensing) who are co-locating retail locations to sell both medical and adult use products will be required to pay $5 million upfront to enter the market, as well as $5 million paid within 180 days of the opening of their second co-located dispensary; and more depending upon how much revenue they bring in.


OCM’s executive director Christopher Alexander told Capital Tonight in June that a portion of the licensing fees paid by MSOs will be used to help small retailers.


“There’s definitely a need for some additional outlets to sell cannabis products, and at the same time, there’s also an investment that comes from those registered organizations’ participation in the adult use market – an investment that will be significant in helping to fund our equity programs,” Alexander explained. “It is a bit of a give and take.”


Wednesday’s meeting of the Cannabis Control Board in New York City will include the approval of “growers’ showcases”, which Carbone supports. Carbone also told Capital Tonight that she expects the board to approve hundreds of additional CAURD licenses.
 
"with only 19 licensed dispensaries for 19 million residents, legal sales—and the paltry taxes that come from the struggling legal market—are not bringing in the taxes that were promised. At the same time, the state is desperately trying to foster an industry composed of “justice-involved” entrepreneurs, meaning people who have been arrested for marijuana crimes, with a specific social equity goal of helping Black and brown entrepreneurs."​


Yes, Virginia...government can be depended upon to fuck things up this badly....with great consistency.

The King of unlicensed Weed Dispensaries declares war


Jonathan Elfand built a $25 million-dollar kingdom with Empire Cannabis Club. Then state tax officials raided his dispensaries. And he’s ready for battle.​


On a hot Tuesday morning in July, a phalanx of New York State Department of Taxation and Finance agents, with bulletproof vests and handguns on their hips, descended on two unlicensed cannabis dispensaries in Manhattan. But the employees of Empire Cannabis Club, which has six locations in the city and is one of the largest unlicensed marijuana retail operators in the state, were prepared and would not let them in without a warrant.


So began the mellowest standoff.


Hours later, Jonathan Elfand, co-founder of Empire, lumbered up to the door of his Chelsea location. He told the agents, who had been standing in the sun, that he was going to open the door and they can push through behind him but are not welcome inside. An agent told Elfand he was under arrest for obstruction of governmental inquiry and slapped cuffs around his wrists. “My attorneys will love this—let’s go,” the 54-year-old Elfand told the officer. (He was later released and not charged.) A few miles south, at Empire’s Lower East Side location, Elfand’s younger sister and business partner, Lenore, was arrested and charged with obstruction of justice and brought to a police precinct. (The state has not filed any charges against the business.)


Tax agents seized several pounds of cannabis flower, THC-infused edibles and vaporizers from an open safe inside one of Empire’s establishments, according to official evidence documents reviewed by Forbes. The products, which filled a few trash bags, are worth between $50,000 to $60,000, according to Elfand. For some businesses, this raid would be devastating. But it was only a small inconvenience for Empire, which Elfand claims distributed $20 million worth of product last year. He hopes to hit $35 million in 2023. Launched in September 2021, Empire has 120,000 paying members—some of whom spend $35 per month, while others shell out $15 for a single visit—and these fees bring in another $5 million a year, Elfand claims. The authorities did not shutter the stores and the following day all Empire locations were still operating.


Inside his club’s Chelsea location hours after the raid, Elfand, who was with his sister, brother, Blake, and father, Ralph, was unperturbed by the day’s festivities. “I’m the fucking king of New York,” he says. “I own the cannabis trade.”


Lenore, who had just been released from the NYPD’s 7th Precinct, says the Elfand family is ready to go to war to protect its cannabis kingdom. “We are going to court—it’s time to prove our legality, what we believed all along and how we're operating under the law New York wrote,” she says. “We have to fight, and now is our chance—they came at us.”


The raid of Empire marks a major turning point in the years-long battle between New York lawmakers, regulators and the state’s vibrant and robust marijuana gray market. Since legalizing cannabis in March 2021, New York has been slow issuing licenses—there are currently only 19 licensed stores throughout the state—and the authorities have been light on enforcement. This environment has led to the proliferation of an estimated 3,500 unlicensed pot shops across the state. But New York Governor Kathy Hochul and New York City Mayor Eric Adams have remained adamant that unlicensed operators are going to be snuffed out.


Last summer, the New York State Office of Cannabis Management sent Empire, and a slew of other unlicensed operators, a cease-and-desist letter warning that crackdowns were coming. While some operators closed their dispensaries and others got raided, the Elfands claim they are operating legally without a license because of a legal loophole—or what they call a “safe harbor”—in the state law. Technically speaking, Empire is a private club and does not sell cannabis—members pay that small fee to enter the store and any money exchanged for cannabis products is consideration not financial compensation.


Cannabis Laws by state


New York regulators don’t see it that way and have stepped up enforcement efforts in hopes to weed out the unlicensed dispensaries. In June, Governor Hochul signed new legislation that increases civil and tax penalties for unlicensed and illicit sale of cannabis. The new law also provides enforcement power to the Office of Cannabis Management and the Department of Taxation and Finance to levy penalties—up to $20,000 a day for violations—and shutter stores selling cannabis illegally. "Unlicensed dispensaries violate our laws, put public health at risk, and undermine the legal cannabis market,” Governor Hochul said in a statement at the time.


If New York can successfully scale its recreational marijuana market, it would become the nation’s second-largest regulated cannabis economy, after California, with $4.2 billion in annual sales. But with only 19 licensed dispensaries for 19 million residents, legal sales—and the paltry taxes that come from the struggling legal market—are not bringing in the taxes that were promised. At the same time, the state is desperately trying to foster an industry composed of “justice-involved” entrepreneurs, meaning people who have been arrested for marijuana crimes, with a specific social equity goal of helping Black and brown entrepreneurs.


Bud Tending: Unlike traditional dispensaries that sell cannabis, Empire operates with a membership fee, which Elfand believes complies with New York law.


While the Elfands are white, the family has a long history of selling cannabis—and many members of the family have the criminal records to prove it.


Jonathan Elfand has been put in handcuffs many times. Born on April Fool’s Day 1969, he grew up between Brooklyn and the Bronx and got into the weed game in junior high after moving to Florida. He grew his first crop in a house in West Melbourne and soon expanded to a 12-stall horse ranch his dad owned in Palm Bay. At 17, he successfully pulled off his first international weed smuggling operation when he sailed a 32-foot Columbia to Jamaica, loaded it up with 680 pounds of pot and brought it back to Florida. Elfand would repeat that trip half a dozen times but stopped using the route after an associate was caught by the National Guard with a shipment off the Florida Keys.


Elfand moved back to New York in 1990, rented a basement in a high-rise in Manhattan’s Garment District, and converted it into a 200-light grow operation. By the mid-1990s, he had mastered the art of growing high-end indoor designer weed with clandestine grows in Brooklyn and became a prolific smuggler who the government alleged worked with the Arellano-Felix drug cartel in Tijuana. Elfand would pack trucks with 1,000-pound loads of salsa cans filled with pot and bring them across the Mexico border to San Diego, where he had a phony marine engine business that worked as a cover to traffic tens of thousands of pounds of cannabis to Chicago, Florida and New York via rental trucks, commercial airlines and the U.S. Mail.


Eventually, America’s war on drugs caught up with him. In 1998, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and the NYPD busted a sophisticated indoor grow that Elfand ran with his father and brother inside a four-story Williamsburg warehouse—the feds alleged there were 2,000 cannabis plants but the exact scale was never proved in court. "This is the largest seizure of an indoor marijuana growing operation, within the five boroughs, in recent history for the New York Division," New York DEA Special Agent Lewis Rice said at the time. The government alleged that the Elfands’ U.S. Mail scheme alone generated $2 million a year and the family brought in millions more thanks to their grow operations and other smuggling routes.


Elfand, who was 30 at the time of his arrest, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute marijuana and was sentenced to 10 years in prison while his father, then 59, was sentenced to three. “We were bunkies,” says Ralph, now 83, explaining how father and son shared the same cell in Otisville, a federal prison in New York’s Hudson Valley. “People would think we were crazy, but we had a good time in prison.”


Throughout most of his legal issues, Jonathan Elfand has often represented himself in court and has put forth multiple arguments claiming his arrests, asset forfeitures and detentions were unconstitutional. He won some, but Clarence Darrow he is not—having lost many of those arguments in court. Now, after decades of finding himself standing before judges and sitting in prison cells, he says he has refined his legal argument and believes even if he gets indicted on federal marijuana crimes, he could ultimately beat it. His first step is to go to state court and get his seized product back, which he believes was taken illegally since he is operating legally under New York’s law.


If the court rules in his favor, Elfand will continue to expand his business. If it doesn’t go his way, then he will appeal and put forth an argument that he believes will prevail. “The 14th Amendment is one of the biggest treasures that we have in the Constitution,” says Elfand.


His argument, which he explains with the conviction of someone without a law degree, relies on the amendment created after the Civil War that gives equal protection under the law to all Americans. Elfand believes it will help him prove that he can legally operate his business, state license or not. He says the government cannot charge him with marijuana-related crimes without taking down multibillion-dollar businesses like Curaleaf, Trulieve and Green Thumb Industries, all of which grow, distribute and sell cannabis legally in multiple states.


“How are you not charging Curaleaf?” he asks. “It is totally unconstitutional. Everyone has to be treated the same way.”


Not everyone believes Elfand’s defense is airtight. Paul Armentano, the deputy director of the non-profit organization NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), dismisses much of Elfand’s legal posturing. “It’s exasperating,” says Armentano. “I've been doing this for 30 years and I've heard them all. Just because a law is a bad law doesn’t make it unconstitutional.”


But Sam Kamin, a professor at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law who has expertise in marijuana laws, gives Elfand some credit for creativity. “The legal theory, to a layperson, sounds persuasive,” says Kamin. “But I don’t think a court is likely to buy that argument.”


Kamin, who helped Colorado implement its recreational marijuana program, says unlicensed businesses try to operate in every new state that launches cannabis sales, but they eventually get licensed or go out of business. “People think legalization will be the end of enforcement, but that’s not true,” he says. “Cannabis legalization isn’t the end of enforcement, it’s regulation and anything outside of that conduct is criminal.”


But there are some local attorneys who agree with Elfand. Paula Collins, a New York lawyer who represents many unlicensed cannabis entrepreneurs but is not involved with the Elfands, says New York “goofed” while writing its law and club memberships can legally operate under the guidelines.


“We are going to see more activity—a big legal fight,” says Collins. “This is not illicit cannabis. What they are calling illicit cannabis they have improperly defined in the law.”


While sitting in Empire Cannabis Club after the raid, and with a new baby at home, Elfand says he has learned from all the mistakes he’s made that got him locked up and studied the law so intently that he knows how to operate in a federally illegal industry without going to prison again. And now he’s ready to test out his refined legal argument and put his future on the line.


“My kid is always going to be able to look up and know that their dad had the balls to walk through everything he walked into,” he says. “I do everything because I know I'm right. If I am wrong somehow, and I lose, I'll take 30 years—let’s get on with it.”
 
I’m sure New York is dragging its feet for a reason. There are those in office that didn’t want legal weed in NY. I guess getting tax money isn’t that important to them.
 

Military Veterans File Suit Against New York’s Cannabis Licensing Rules

Four military veterans have filed suits against New York regulations that restrict the state’s first cannabis retailer licenses to those with marijuana-related convictions.

A group of four military veterans last week filed suit against New York’s Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), claiming that the agency’s rules that prioritize applicants with prior marijuana convictions for cannabis dispensary licenses violate the state’s 2021 marijuana legalization statute. In a complaint filed in the New York State Supreme Court, the four plaintiffs argue that state regulators failed to follow the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA) when it did not issue cannabis retail licenses to disabled veterans and members of other minority groups. The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order barring the state from issuing further licenses under the Conditional Adult-Use Retail Dispensary (CAURD) program, which have been reserved for applicants with a marijuana-related criminal conviction.

The MRTA included provisions that set a goal of awarding at least half of the state’s recreational marijuana dispensaries to social and economic equity applicants. Under an initiative spearheaded by New York Governor Kathy Hochul last year, the state’s first licenses for retail cannabis shops have been reserved for “individuals most impacted by the unjust enforcement of the prohibition of cannabis or nonprofit organizations whose services include support for the formerly incarcerated.”

To be eligible for a CAURD license, applicants are required to either have had a cannabis conviction or be the family member of someone with a cannabis conviction, among other criteria. Nonprofits with a history of serving formerly incarcerated or currently incarcerated individuals were eligible to apply for a CAURD license. So far, the OCM has issued 463 CAURD licenses, although less than two dozen dispensaries have opened across the state so far.

“The MRTA had already established a goal to award 50% of all adult-use licenses to social and economic equity applicants. But instead of following the law, OCM and CCB created their own version of ‘social equity’ and determined for themselves which individuals would get priority to enter New York’s nascent adult-use cannabis market,” reads a statement on behalf of the veterans bringing the legal action.

Lawsuit Argues OCM Rules Unconstitutional

The lawsuit was filed by four U.S. veterans who have served a combined more than two decades in various branches of the military. They argue that restricting retail licenses to those with cannabis convictions was not approved by the legislature and violates the state Constitution.

“It’s out of character for a veteran to sue the state to uphold a law,” William Norgard, one of the plaintiffs in the case and a U.S. Army veteran, said in a statement quoted by the Olean Times Herald. “We take oaths to defend the laws of our nation, and trust — maybe naively — that government officials will faithfully and legally execute those laws. What the Office of Cannabis Management is doing right now is in complete breach of that trust. As veterans, we know that someone has to hold the line.”

“Service-disabled veterans are the only social equity group in the law not born into priority status, but a group to which anyone could belong,” said Carmine Fiore, who served eight years in the U.S. Army and New York Army National Guard and is also one of the four plaintiffs in the case. “We are also the only priority group in the (law) that achieved its status by helping communities.”

“It feels like we were used to get a law passed — a good law, one that helps a lot of people, as well as the state,” Fiore added. “Then, once it was passed, we were cast aside for another agenda.”

The other plaintiffs are Steve Mejia and Dominic Spaccio, who both served six years in the U.S. Air Force.

Lucas McCann, co-founder and chief scientific officer at cannabis compliance consulting firm CannDelta Inc., notes that there is no mention of the CAURD program in the MRTA. When the program was created, the definition of social equity was defined to exclusively include those with previous cannabis-related convictions and previous business experience. But a broader definition of social equity may be appropriate, and future rounds of licensing could include members of other groups, McCann says.

“The grievances brought forward by the four military veterans highlight another facet of the ‘social equity’ conversation that cannot be ignored. Veterans, particularly disabled ones, face their own set of challenges and hurdles,” he wrote in an email. “Their dedicated service to the nation warrants recognition and inclusion in the emerging industry, especially when considering the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis for a myriad of health issues commonly faced by veterans.”

Michelle Bodian, a partner at the leading cannabis and psychedelics law firm Vicente LLP, said that is too early to determine how the lawsuit will affect the continuing rollout of New York’s regulated marijuana industry.

“There is always a chance the lawsuit will succeed, and the CAURD program will be halted; however, it’s equally as likely the state will settle with the plaintiffs and award them a license,” Bodian said in a statement to High Times. “As the TRO hearing is scheduled for later this week, we should know in short order whether the CAURD program is frozen in place or whether new provisional or final licenses can be awarded.”

When asked about the legal action, an OCM spokesperson told local media outlets that the agency does not comment on pending litigation.
 
Just another example of government incompetence. And fuck "social equity" which is gets defined as whatever politicians think will get them more votes.

New York judge halts retail Marijuana licensing

NY attorney: "It’s throwing a monkey wrench into a lot of people’s plans."​


History is repeating itself. For the second time in less than a year, a New York judge has issued an order halting all state cannabis retail licensing.


Judge Kevin Bryant on Monday sided with four service-disabled military veterans who filed suit against the New York Office of Cannabis Management and other state officials last week. The veterans’ suit claimed that the OCM violated the 2021 state law that legalized recreational marijuana by reserving initial retail permits only for select social equity candidates and forcing the plaintiffs to wait.


Bryant issued an order Monday for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order against the OCM, preventing it from further processing or awarding any conditional adult use retail dispensary marijuana permits, at least until a hearing scheduled for Friday morning.


Bryant wrote that there’s sufficient evidence that the four plaintiffs – military veterans Carmine Fiore, William Norgard, Steve Mejia, and Dominic Spaccio – are facing “irreparable injury, loss or damage unless the defendants … are restrained before a hearing can be had.”


Bryant scheduled a hearing for Friday, Aug. 11, in Albany Supreme Court at 10 a.m. to “show cause why an order should not be entered” preventing the OCM and the New York Cannabis Control Board from authorizing any additional retail permits until another pending lawsuit – filed by the Coalition for Access to Regulated and Safe Cannabis – is also heard and finished.


Until then, Bryant wrote, the OCM and CCB “are hereby restrained from awarding or further processing any more CAURD licenses and/or conferring operational approval upon any more provisional or existing CAURD licensees pending further order of this court.”


Attorneys for the four plaintiffs declined to comment to Green Market Report, and a spokesman for the OCM and CCB did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


New York City cannabis attorney David Feder, who shared the order on LinkedIn, said he has CAURD clients now scrambling to figure out how this may affect their businesses, since the vast majority of the 463 CAURD licensees are still in the build-out phase.


“It’s throwing a monkey wrench into a lot of people’s plans,” Feder said. “They’re in the process of making significant decisions.”


That includes choices on purchasing or leasing real estate, figuring out delivery business models, purchasing vehicles for deliveries, and searching for financing. The new restraining order only complicates the picture, Feder said.


“People are scared. They don’t know what to do going forward,” he said.


Based on Bryant’s order, Feder said, “I think they have a good case. I hate to say it. … This case has legs.”


Feder noted that the hearing on Friday will be open to the public, and he encouraged stakeholders to show up to observe what exactly happens at the courthouse in Albany.


This is the second time a court case has stalled the New York market rollout. Last year, a federal judge temporarily halted CAURD licensing in five New York regions. Regulators were allowed to issue retail cannabis permits in those areas beginning in May and then June.
 

New York's new THC limitations put squeeze on local bars and businesses



New York state's cannabis rollout is seeing yet another potential roadblock.​


Last month state cannabis regulators set new limitations on THC use in consumable products.


This new temporary law puts limits on consumable THC products sold in New York like edibles, seltzers, and gummies.


Now, this all came to light after officials found a loophole in the 2018 Federal Farm Bill which essentially allows intoxicating levels of THC in consumables, without any regulations on who could sell those products.


"We were excited to start selling a new product category that we thought would align with some of the different trends that we're seeing in the bar and beverage industry,” said August Rosa, bar owner.


The THC seltzers have become a hit for Rosa's customers looking for non-alcoholic drinks and other forms of THC consumables. Now, consumers will have to look out of state for these products or go to one of the few dispensaries in the region, because state cannabis laws are changing.


"This has developed to about 10-15% of our business which is significant,” said Rosa. “So, to begin this new opportunity, successfully grow the category in a really short period of time and have it be taken away."


The change in THC limitations was drafted in an emergency justification stating there can be no more than 10 milligrams of THC per serving of consumable products.


Cycling Frog, a West coast CBD, THC company distributes products across the country, including here in New York.


Company reps say they support the state-creating regulations-but not all of them.


"We want to be classified as a product and we want clear lanes to travel forward on,” said Dylan Summers, VP Government Affairs at Cycling Frog. “It's just that in this case the OCM has made some pretty limiting regulations."


The new regulations mean companies like Cycling Frog must head back to the drawing board.


"That's terribly expensive, we've done our best assessment of the multiple states, the lack of clarity from the 2018 Farm Bill provides for products, we're left to kind of a scatter shot approach to maintain compliance with every single state and their program,” added Summers.


Earlier this month, Cycling Frog and several companies both in and out of state filed an adjudication in Albany County Supreme Court against the emergency justification.
 
Further to the article posted two posts above....this says it all, IMO:

“The rollout … has been ham-fisted at best,” he said. “It's a little bit strange to me that we have all the time, all the money, and the market, and the experience of all the other states who have gone before us to lean on. And we've still managed to screw this up.”


New York's Cannabis on hold after a court injunction


A state Supreme Court judge will hold a hearing Friday on a challenge to the state’s retail cannabis licensing rules that has brought New York’s troubled recreational marijuana rollout to a halt.


Earlier this month, Judge Kevin Bryant issued an injunction barring the state Office of Cannabis Management, or OCM, from licensing any new retail cannabis stores after four service-disabled veterans brought a lawsuit, saying that they were unfairly left out of the first round of awarded licenses.


They argued that, according to the 2021 Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act, which legalized adult use of recreational cannabis in New York, the first retail licenses were to go to people convicted of a marijuana-related offense, veterans who incurred a disability due to their war service, minority- and women-owned businesses, and financially distressed farmers.


The veterans said OCM diverged from the statute when they set up rules that limited the first round of licenses to people with previous marijuana-related convictions.


Bryant agreed, ruling that since the Legislature did not amend the original law to alter that first category of licensees, there’s a “significant likelihood” that the four veterans will ultimately win their case. He ordered all new retail licenses to be put on hold until the case is decided.


Opponents of the lawsuit include Osbert Oduna, a retired Marine and service-disabled veteran who runs a cannabis delivery service in Queens. His business partner was convicted of a marijuana-related offense during prohibition.


Orduna – who has been conditionally approved for a license for a retail location but has not yet opened a store – is against the lawsuit. He said it only stalls an already impeded process and has a “chilling effect” on the fledgling industry.


“I'm opposed to anything that puts us versus them,” Orduna said. “Us being one social equity group against another.”


He said the licensing application process would have opened to the other groups, including the veterans and women- and minority-owned businesses, on Oct. 4. But that’s now also likely on hold due to the injunction.


The lawsuit isn’t the only factor that has slowed the legal cannabis rollout, and two years in, only 24 stores have opened out of about 160 outlets that were supposed to be up and running by now. Many in the struggling industry are increasingly concerned.


“It's unfortunate. This is possibly the worst thing that could happen to the small businesses and startups,” said Hal McCabe, the interim director of the Cannabis Association of New York, which represents small-scale, locally based growers and retail sellers. “Because it's frozen them in place, and it's frozen the supply chain.”


McCabe is also the mayor of the village of Homer, which is seeking to locate a retail outlet in the village and in the nearby city of Cortland.


He said small-scale farmers who were granted growing licenses last year grew 300,000 pounds of cannabis, and to date, only around 18,000 pounds have been sold. He said many are in danger of bankruptcy.


McCabe and Oduna believe that the delays will benefit the large-scale operations that currently sell medical marijuana in New York and operate large, efficient, indoor growing spaces.


Oduna said if the OCM follows its current rules, then the large companies will be eligible to apply for licenses in December.


“They're also going to be winners here,” said Orduna, who added the large operations can just “flip the switch” and devote half of their existing retail space to recreational sales.


McCabe said he believes that state lawmakers, the governor, and even the OCM have had the best intentions in trying to “right some wrongs” and give the first licenses to people most adversely affected by cannabis prohibition.


But he said so much has gone wrong.


“The rollout … has been ham-fisted at best,” he said. “It's a little bit strange to me that we have all the time, all the money, and the market, and the experience of all the other states who have gone before us to lean on. And we've still managed to screw this up.”


He said, meanwhile, an estimated 3,000 illegal, unlicensed cannabis dispensaries are thriving.


The judge did make some exceptions to the injunction. Conditional retail licenses granted before Aug. 7, when the lawsuit was filed, can go forward. Those approved after that date will be evaluated by the judge on a case-by-case basis. OCM has until the end of the day Thursday to get that paperwork in.


In a statement, OCM’s Taylor Randi Lee said the agency is disappointed with the judge’s decision but is proud to work toward the goal of establishing “a first-of-its-kind, adult-use cannabis market that works to right the wrongs of the past.”


Lee said OCM is applying to the court for exemptions from the injunction “on behalf of provisional licensees who are ready to open.” Lee said the agency won’t let the court case “derail” its efforts.


Friday’s hearing will be held in Kingston.
 
Wow....can't make this up...it'd be hilarious if not so pitiful and contemptuous. This is the anatomy of government fucking things up. They can't even properly administer their own discriminatory "social equity" program. Wow.

TLDR?:

"state Supreme Court Justice Kevin R. Bryant found that marijuana regulators had “failed to follow the clear language of the applicable legislation” that legalized cannabis when they veered from the plain language of the 2021 statute and created a program to award conditional retail licenses exclusively to applicants with past marijuana convictions.​
Bryant’s ruling noted that New York regulators continued their preferential licensing program, and even expanded it, in the face of mounting legal challenges asserting that it was unlawful and violated the constitutional rights of other “social equity” applicants, including minority- and women-owned businesses, as well as disabled military veterans."​

NY Cannabis industry suffers another blow in court ruling


A judge, citing misrepresentations by state regulators, reversed his order that last week had allowed 30 retail marijuana store applicants to move forward.​


A state Supreme Court justice on Tuesday reversed his order last week that had exempted more than two dozen retail cannabis store applicants from an injunction that has frozen the program pending the outcome of litigation challenging the constitutionality of New York’s licensing processes.

The injunction was issued two weeks ago in a case in which state Supreme Court Justice Kevin R. Bryant found that marijuana regulators had “failed to follow the clear language of the applicable legislation” that legalized cannabis when they veered from the plain language of the 2021 statute and created a program to award conditional retail licenses exclusively to applicants with past marijuana convictions.

Bryant’s ruling noted that New York regulators continued their preferential licensing program, and even expanded it, in the face of mounting legal challenges asserting that it was unlawful and violated the constitutional rights of other “social equity” applicants, including minority- and women-owned businesses, as well as disabled military veterans.

Last week, Bryan agreed to allow those with pending applications and who met all licensing approvals prior to Aug. 7 — when his order was issued — to go forward. On Friday, after reviewing court petitions from 30 of those applicants, he issued an order allowing them to continue on a path toward opening their retail cannabis shops.

But in a follow-up order Tuesday, after hearing additional arguments from attorneys for four service-disabled military veterans who challenged the fairness of state’s licensing system, Bryant reversed course and said the injunction will remain in place for all pending applications.

His order noted that state regulators had implied all 30 applicants were in the final stages of their application process and had met the requirements to open their stores. But an affidavit filed by Patrick McKeage, first deputy director of the Office of Cannabis Management, noted that not all applicants had completed those steps.

“They have submitted a list which, by their own admission, includes licensees who are still finalizing construction and whose post-selection inspections have not been scheduled or completed,” Bryant wrote. “It is also clear that an unclear number of the sites have not been inspected 'to ensure (the site) meets all the public health and safety requirements in the Cannabis Law and associated regulations.' It is not clear to this court whether any of the 30 identified licensees have completed all post-selection requirements and inspections and it should be clear that those who have not, should not have been included on the list submitted to the court as set forth in the prior order.”

Some of the cannabis license applicants whose processing will be halted a second time had hoped to open shops in the Hudson Valley, where none have opened, as well as other areas of the state.

The unexpected ruling Tuesday was another setback in the stumbling rollout of New York’s nascent retail cannabis market that has been plagued with delays, missed deadlines and legal challenges that have, at times, stopped it in its tracks.

The injunction shutting off the state’s marijuana retail licensing program was issued in response to a lawsuit filed earlier this month by four service-disabled veterans who accused regulators of unlawfully prioritizing applicants with prior drug convictions while excluding others. The state had asserted that regulators had the authority under the law that legalized marijuana to create a special class of licenses, but Bryant said in his ruling that there is a “significant likelihood” that they will lose that argument.

New York’s attorneys also had argued that the Legislature recognized their new conditional licensing program by including funding for it in a budget bill, which the state argued was the equivalent of statutory authority. But the judge said that acknowledgment was not the same as amending the licensing section of the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act.

The state had previously lost a similar argument in a federal lawsuit filed on behalf of Variscite NY One, a company owned by two men, Jeffrey Jensen and Kenneth Gay, who is a resident of Michigan and owns a construction company there and has a past marijuana conviction in that state. In court filings, their attorney said their retail license application failed to qualify because neither the company nor Gay, who has a 51 percent ownership of the company, had met the application’s definition of “a significant New York state presence” — including having his marijuana conviction in another state.

A federal injunction that had been issued in that case shut down the processing of retail marijuana licensing for months in five of the state 14 regions. The case was later settled and the state resumed its controversial licensing program at an “expanded and accelerated rate” despite the constitutional issues that had been raised.

Attorneys for the state had argued at a hearing several weeks ago Bryant that an injunction would cause further harm to the rollout program that has already been beset with delays and problems. Bryant opined that much of that harm had been self-inflicted.

“This court also notes that it was (the state Office of Cannabis Management) that decided to move forward and accelerate the (conditional licensing) program in the face of unresolved litigation and they were undeniably on notice of the alleged constitutional defects at issue,” Bryant wrote. “Despite this notice, (regulators) encouraged potential licensees to incur significant expenses in reliance on a program that (they) knew was at issue in pending litigation.”

Many distressed farmers and others were blocked from applying for cannabis licenses as a result of the ruling.

Bryant had invoked the concerns of those groups in his ruling, noting the “denial of the injunction and the continued processing of licenses in the face of the pending challenges could potentially cause irreparable harm to the potential licensees, the development of the market and the community at large.”

He found that the state’s embattled licensing process also was plagued with “numerous potential defects” that “have already resulted in numerous constitutional challenges to the actions.”

The lawsuit filed by the four veterans invoked similar legal arguments to a case filed in March by a coalition of medical marijuana license holders and recreational market hopefuls whose civil complaint, which is also pending, sought a court order to open the retail licensing process “for all applicants immediately.” That case, which was rolled into the veterans' case, did not seek an injunction.

Cannabis regulators have issued 463 conditional retail licenses to applicants with prior cannabis convictions — and to a small number of nonprofit agencies that provide services in minority communities.

But both lawsuits assert that the cannabis regulators overstepped their authority by creating a special licensing category for people with convictions — a decision that they claim was not approved by the Legislature. The petitions contend the move violated the state constitution.
 
I find it mind blowing....truly Orwellian...that certain elements of our society see intentional discrimination (in any form) as "social justice".

Fairness and justice must prevail’ in NY Cannabis


The legalization and regulation of adult-use cannabis in our state represent monumental strides toward social justice and economic growth.


However, this progress is being thwarted by a small group of plaintiffs who, under the guise of seeking ‘fair competition,’ are inflicting irreparable harm upon law-abiding businesses.

These plaintiffs claim their actions aim to prevent ‘irreparable harm’ due to potential real estate conflicts. In reality, their tactics exacerbate this very harm by stalling the entire licensing process, affecting not just one business but all CAURD licensees who have complied with existing regulations. Their case could have been brought over a year ago, making their timing of filing now, so close to October when they would have been able to apply anyway, quite suspicious.

Adding to the irony is the fact that while we, the CAURD community, patiently await judicial and administrative resolution, the illicit cannabis market thrives unchecked.

While approximately 2,000 illegal shops operate freely — some of which occupy the very real estate claimed to be desired by the plaintiffs — law-abiding businesses are held in limbo, unable to serve the communities they are a part of.

The court has not been unfair, and we understand the regulatory hurdles the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) faces. It is the plaintiffs, however, who seem to have lost sight of the bigger picture. By leveraging this moment to obstruct and delay, they are not only threatening the livelihoods of their competitors but also undermining the broader goals of legalization.

We are law-abiding New York State businesses ready to contribute to our local communities and economy. We call upon the plaintiffs to reconsider their obstructionist tactics and for the public, local politicians, media, and business groups to scrutinize this ongoing issue. Fairness and justice must prevail for the well-being and progress of all involved.
 
NY is forlorn and hamstrung by its self inflicted circle jerk policies 100%,
IMG_20230831_095117_357.jpg
 
This is the anatomy of politicians and government at work. Totally fuck up a program beyond all recognition.....then have a committee meeting, issue agendas and minutes, make broad public statements, have more committee meetings, rinse and repeat endlessly. It would be hilarious if not so fucking sad and pitiful.

New York Senate Marijuana Committee Schedules Hearing To Address Challenges For Legalization Rollout


The chair of a New York Senate cannabis committee says his panel will hold its first public hearing next month to try and identify legislative solutions to the state’s ongoing marijuana legalization implementation problems by bringing regulators, lawmakers, stakeholders and advocates together for a “fair and productive” policy discussion.

Sen. Jeremy Cooney (D), who was appointed to lead the Senate’s first-ever cannabis panel earlier this year, announced the October 30 hearing during a press conference on Thursday. He said that the purpose of the meeting is to “finally address the many challenges that we have seen with the rollout of adult-use cannabis here in New York.”

Frustrations over New York’s cannabis program have compounded over recent months, as regulators have worked to stand up a market that prioritizes social equity, awarding conditional licenses to people who’ve been most impacted by prohibition. The process has been slow—and illicit cannabis businesses have proliferated in the interim. Meanwhile, lawsuits have temporarily halted licensing, further complicating the issue.

Cooney acknowledged that “it is no secret that the state’s path to adult-use cannabis has been met with a number of challenges,” and he said “one of the most important jobs that we have as state lawmakers is legislative oversight.”

“We have a responsibility to work with our governor and our state agencies to ensure that our collective goals are met,” he said. “And New Yorkers themselves deserve transparency when it comes to their government on what has been done so far.”

While the senator said that the meeting next month before the 12-member Senate Subcommittee on Cannabis is primarily meant to be part of a “fact-finding” process, he told Marijuana Moment that “we will hopefully identify specific public policy needs [and] legislation in the hearing process. That’s why it’s important that we do it now, this fall, before we convene in Albany.”

He also said that “my expectation is that hopefully by the time this hearing takes place in Albany, we will see a path forward for the non-conditional licenses applications” for people who do not qualify as social equity business owners.

“This is important that we move on this—and we need to make sure that we have the full picture of what is needed to be able to advance legislation, whether it’s coming through my office or one of my colleagues’,” Cooney said. “So this will be this will be part of that process, and we will generate recommendations of the policy report at the conclusion of the hearing.”

Witnesses for the hearing—which comes as existing medical cannabis businesses have been increasingly agitating to enter the state’s adult-use market—haven’t been listed yet, but the chairman said that he doesn’t want it to simply be government officials and lawmakers in the room. It’s intended to “involve the cannabis community at large,” including those who’ve faced challenges entering the market. Cooney stressed, though, that he will not allow the hearing “to be used as an opportunity to air personal grievances or attack individuals or agencies.”

The hearing will also be held in conjunction with the chairs of the Senate Agriculture, Finance and Investigations & Government Operations Committees.

“I understand that this is a very frustrating, confusing, fast-moving time for both potential consumers and those invested in the adult use-market,” Cooney said. “Remember that it was about a year ago today that the [conditional adult-use retail dispensary] program was first launched in New York—and here we are all these months later, very unsatisfied with its outcome.”

“I hear the concern of these voices and I understand that they have communities that they have to be accountable for, and we want to give them an opportunity to be able to share their stories and, hopefully more importantly, learn from their experiences,” the senator said. “But we need to take action and as a legislature [and] as the state Senate.”

Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D) said on Thursday that the forthcoming Senate Subcommittee on Cannabis hearing, conducted in collaboration with the Finance, Agriculture, and IGO Committees, is “another step in our commitment to a responsible and equitable retail cannabis market in New York State.”

The Cannabis Association of New York said that “sunlight is the best disinfectant, and more transparency will help us all turn the New York legal cannabis around before it’s too late.”

“This hearing will provide the valuable opportunity to explore how we got here and record those learned lessons through this hearing’s transcripts,” the association said. “However, understanding the past is only one piece of the puzzle; we need clarity on what the future holds.”
 
This appears to be NY's answer to their totally fucking up the rollout of retail rec licenses while at the same time utterly fucking the small business people they promised initial protection.

It’s official: New York will open adult-use marijuana retail to multistate operators

New York regulators voted Tuesday to allow the state’s medical marijuana operators to apply for adult-use retail licenses.

That means the multistate operators who years ago snapped up a majority of the state’s 10 “registered organization” permits will enter what observers say could be the largest market on the East Coast.

Under the resolutions the Office of Cannabis Management approved Tuesday, regulators will accept applications seeking a retail or microbusiness license from Oct. 4 through Dec. 23.

Regulators also will accept applications from registered organizations during a still-unspecified window “to be set by the Office.” That action was approved in a separate resolution.


“Today marks a pivotal step toward expanding and sustaining the state’s medical program and creation of an economically viable and equitable adult-use cannabis industry in New York,” Barry Carmody, a spokesperson for the New York Medical Cannabis Industry Association (NYMCIA), said after a Cannabis Control Board meeting in Albany.

The NYMCIA represents eight of the existing MMJ licensees, including major MSOs such as New York-based Acreage Holdings and Columbia Care, Chicago-headquartered Cresco Labs and Green Thumb Industries and Massachusetts-based Curaleaf Holdings.

The vote, finalizing a May proposal by the OCM, means:


The vote came a week after the CEOs of four multistate operators implored New York Gov. Kathy Hochul to allow them to enter the state’s adult-use market “without delay.”

Small businesses unhappy

“We relied on you,” Jeanette Miller, a Buffalo-area cannabis farmer, told the OCM board and staff at an impassioned meeting, reminding them of the promises that New York would allow small businesses first crack at the adult-use market.

The OCM did not immediately respond to MJBizDaily’s request for comment.

“Today’s Cannabis Control Board meeting opened the door for big cannabis to come in and compete with New York-based businesses,” the Cannabis Association of New York (CANY), which represents small and state-based businesses, said in a statement.

To help level the playing field, the CANY made three demands of New York regulators:

  • Reform the state’s potency tax that charges a higher rates for concentrates.
  • Impose identical canopy limits on “registered organizations” (ROs) and small businesses.
  • Crack down on the illicit market in the state. Estimates vary, but officials have said there are as many as 2,000 unlicensed sellers in New York City alone.

New York legalized adult-use cannabis in March 2021, but so far, adult-use retail licenses have been available only to “impacted individuals” of the war on drugs and certain nonprofits – to whom the state also promised 50% of all licenses.

Although hundreds of CAURD permits have been awarded, only 23 of those licensees are open for business, five of which are delivery-only.

That means CAURD applicants are burning through savings on real estate that isn’t generating revenue while small farmers – who lack the promised access to licensed retail – are watching their harvested crops go stale.


Lawsuits still in play

Meanwhile, litigation still looms over the adult-use licensing process in New York.

Two separate suits against OCM are still pending: the one filed by the MSOs and another by a group of “service-disabled veterans” shut out from the CAURD program. The group filed a lawsuit in August that challenged the legality of the CAURD program.

The OCM went into executive session to discuss those lawsuits after the public portion of Tuesday’s meeting ended.

It’s unclear what’s next for the CAURD program, which legal observers have said might be unconstitutional.

Small-business advocates have unsuccessfully begged Gov. Kathy Hochul to recall the Legislature into a special session to specifically codify the CAURD program.

“I don’t believe CAURD’s going away,” said Dasheeda Dawson, the director of Cannabis NYC, whom Mayor Eric Adams appointed last October.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Dawson spoke out against the ROs and also had choice words for the other litigants.

“Without a shadow of a doubt, I stand here firmly to say, ‘No to RO,’” she said. “We know on the record what people are doing to block (New York’s rollout), and we cannot reward them.”
 

New York battling judge over exemptions to Cannabis retail license pause

The suggested waiver list by the OCM was rejected by the judge.​


New York marijuana regulators have spent nearly the past month trying to convince a state judge to allow a handful of conditional adult use retail dispensary (CAURD) licensees to open for business, but as of Friday, nothing the state tried had yet worked, which leaves the Empire State with just 23 operational legal cannabis shops for the foreseeable future.


When Judge Kevin Bryant handed down a preliminary injunction last month that froze all retail permitting, he also tried to be flexible with regulators and licenseholders by creating a carve-out for CAURDs that had met all requirements for licensure by Aug. 7. The state Office of Cannabis Management then submitted a list of 30 retailers it contended met Bryant’s threshold for exemptions to the court order, whom it suggested should be allowed to open.


But Bryant rejected the list in late August because OCM First Deputy Director Patrick McKeage, in an affidavit, appeared to caveat the 30 because the agency “cannot certify whether a particular licensee … has in fact met all requirements for licensure.”


So the OCM filed an updated affidavit on Sept. 6, and whittled its list of 30 down to 12 that McKeage said “satisfied each requirement prior to August 7, 2023, for receipt of a final license,” including:


  • Air City Cannabis for a delivery operation in Rome
  • Michael D. Gant for a delivery operation in Manhattan
  • Just a Little Higher LLC for a delivery operation in Jamaica
  • No Name Graphics LLC for a delivery operation in Troy
  • Cannabis Emporium Corp. for a retail shop in the Bronx
  • North Country Roots for a retail shop in Saranac Lake
  • MJ Dispensary LLC for a retail shop in Rochester
  • The Herbal Care THC LLC for a retail shop in Manhattan
  • The Highest Peak LLC for a retail shop in Potsdam
  • Brent L. Rogers for a retail shop in Plattsburgh
  • Capital District Cannabis & Wellness Inc. for a retail shop in Albany
  • Gotham Buds LLC for a retail shop in Manhattan
But again, lawyers for the plaintiffs objected, arguing that the OCM hadn’t provided documentation to back up its claims that the 12 were ready to open. On Sept. 11, Bryant sided with them, finding again that the list didn’t meet his full criteria for exemptions to the injunction.


The OCM, Bryant wrote in a new order, “having failed to comply with this court’s order in that it is in conclusory fashion and only indicates which proposed licensees have ‘substantially complied’ with licensing requirements.”


On Friday, the OCM tried once more to convince Bryant that the list of 12 was reasonable and that he should allow some CAURD licensees to move forward, because the judge – OCM argued – wrongly included retail site inspections and approval in his criteria.


McKeage said in yet another new affidavit that site inspections and approval are the very last step, and typically go even after full licenses are awarded. He noted that Housing Works – the very first legal adult-use cannabis shop to open in New York – was awarded its full license on Dec. 23 and then had its site inspection on Dec. 28 before opening to the public on Dec. 29.


“The on-site compliance inspection is separate and distinct from license issuance and the on-site inspection is not required prior to the license certificate being issued. In fact, of 23 CAURD licenses issued to date where an on-site compliance inspection was required, only 13 were issued license certificates after a final compliance inspection had taken place,” McKeage said in the affidavit.


As of mid-day Friday, it also wasn’t clear if any new developments had emerged from a conference held that morning with the judge and all the attorneys in the case, and next steps for CAURD licensees remain unclear.
 
""We know there's room for improvement"

No shit, Hochul....you really couldn't have fucked it up more.

"I'm committed to working with all stakeholders to get the job done right,"

FFS....politicians ALWAYS say "I'm committed" to this or that....but who gives a fuck about your "commitment". What people do give a fuck about are your actions and that remains to be seen.

I really do intensly dislike politicians...of all stripes. Lying ass, self-serving, hypocrites.



Hochul makes major expansion for the NY Cannabis market


A massive expansion for New York State's legal cannabis market is in motion as the industry develops.


New York Gov. Kathy Hochul will be working on major improvements for the legal cannabis market and making efforts to shut down illegal sales.


She announced this week that there will be hundreds of licenses and applications being made in the process for individuals and businesses that would like to grow, process, distribute, and sell cannabis legally.


There have been over 8,500 pounds of illegal product, totaling more than $42 million in enforcements.


Partnerships with localities have been made in order to make an increase in fines and penalties to businesses.


"We know there's room for improvement as New York works to launch a brand-new cannabis industry and crack down on illicit operators, and I'm committed to working with all stakeholders to get the job done right," Governor Hochul said.


Executive Director of New York State Office of Cannabis Management, Chris Alexander, speaks for many of the businesses who are depending on the regulations to maintain their consumers safety and satisfaction.


“This is a significant moment for entrepreneurs who have been waiting for an opportunity to join this consequential market. We’re building the biggest and fairest cannabis market in the world, and the opening of a new application window means an expansion of opportunity," Alexander said in a statement.


Inspections on any unlicensed cannabis activity will also have be investigated by the department of labor which ensure employers and their employees are being compliant.
 

Sponsored by

VGoodiez 420EDC
Back
Top